Our Opinion: Lawmakers act on ‘vaping’ amid unknowns
News Tribune editorial
Saturday, April 19, 2014
Public debate about e-cigarettes is heating up.
The byproducts — controversy, promotion and opposition — may be outpacing factual information.
Electronic cigarettes are battery-powered, nicotine-delivery devices that heat liquid nicotine into a vapor that a user inhales. Use is called “vaping” for vapor that is emitted. No tobacco is burned or smoked.
A question arises whether vaping is a step-down phase for tobacco smokers to quit eventually or if vaping will become a popular cultural phenomenon of its own — just as smoking was popular in years past.
The potential for popularity is not lost on e-cigarette manufacturers, who actively are promoting vaping.
Some of those manufacturers are, or are linked to, Big Tobacco. Advertisements emphasize individuality and adventure, not unlike tobacco advertisements of yesteryear. And e-cigarettes are available in flavors — bubble gum, for example — which alarms advocates for children and young adults.
Those advocates fear gains made to reduce smoking among youths may be undermined, particularly if e-cigarettes are determined to be, like tobacco products, health hazards.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has made no determination. According to its website: “E-cigarettes have not been fully studied so consumers currently don’t know: the potential risks of e-cigarettes when used as intended; how much nicotine or other potentially harmful chemicals are being inhaled during use; or if there are any benefits associated with using these products. Additionally, it is not known if e-cigarettes may lead young people to try other tobacco products, including conventional cigarettes, which are known to cause disease and lead to premature death.”
That’s a lot of unknowns.
Missouri representatives this week advanced legislation to prohibit use of e-cigarettes and related devices by people under age 18.
The action appears to respond not to health concerns, which are unknown, but to aggressive e-cigarette promotion targeting young people. In that regard, it could be called the “better-safe-than-sorry” bill.
We eagerly await the health findings. In the meantime, we agree with lawmakers and are inclined to err on the side of caution.
More like this story
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting