City concerned about 2013 revenues
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
For the second month in a row, Jefferson City sales taxes have fallen short and city staff has concerns about whether funds will meet the year’s total revenue projections.
At the Finance Committee meeting Tuesday, the city reported February sales tax receipts for the 1 percent general sales tax came in $181,190 short of projections. In January, the 1 percent general sales tax came in $93,694 short of projections, leaving the year-to-date total shortfall at $123,924 shy of projections.
Information Technology Director Bill Betts, who is serving as interim finance director while awaiting a council decision on whether to approve his proposed new position as assistant city administrator, said he believes some of the year’s projections should be changed to reflect the actual numbers from previous years. Betts said the city is no longer sure the sales taxes will meet the year’s projections.
“We are a little concerned at the staff level,” Betts said.
For the half-cent capital improvement sales tax, January receipts showed a shortfall of $43,785, but in February the tax came in $39,395 above projections. Betts said the projected numbers have been altered after a council work session in December where the city revealed the tax likely would fall about $500,000 short per year from previous projections.
The half-cent parks sales tax also fell short of projections, with January receipts showing a $51,228 shortfall and February receipts showing a $84,207 shortfall.
Betts said staff will present a plan to address the shortfalls in the sales tax receipts at the City Council’s next work session, scheduled for 5:30 p.m. Monday.

Comments
JCLifer 3 months ago
The plan to address the revenue decline needs to focus on ways to increase wages for people in the region. Wages have not kept up with inflatiin, and filjs simply di not have the miney ti spend anymore, whether at local businesses or for increased taxes. Having the lowest #50 state workforce to hold wages down is not helping one bit, nor is a heavily service based economy made up of minimum wage jobs.
The low wages and lack of high wage jobs is hampering quality of life for all, and severely threatens the local economy. The city and the Chamber need to wake up and do everything they can to raise existing wages and to start attracting high wage, high demand jobs.
Growth is the only sign of life. Are we happy being a bottom feeder, decaying town with ever decreasing prosperity and qualiry of life?
3633 3 months ago
I agree with you Lifer, we need better paying jobs in Jefff City!!!
kentheco 3 months ago
How about getting rid of the "percentage" based raises? A one-percent raise for someone making $2400 monthly is a whopping $24 dollars gross increase monthly, or $288 yearly. This “raise” usually does not cover the increasing cost of insurance or taxes and some employees will see a reduction in take home pay. The problem is that those on top of the salary scale continue to benefit while those at the bottom, continue to lose buying power. Some will use the argument that we need to pay more to retain those “on top”. I say, if you do not pay those who do the actual work, you will not need those at the top making the decisions.
JCLifer 3 months ago
Kentheco, flat accross the board raises tend to compress the pay scales and cause other problems. However, this is just a small symptom and a diversion from the real problem.
The REAL PROBLEM is that wages on all levels are severly depressed in this area, and have not kept up with inflation. Family buying power has severely eroded over the past 10 years, and due to ever-increasing prices of essentials like food, gasoline, utilities, healthcare, etc., familes do not have nearly as much money available to spend on non-essentials, if they have any at all. Since they cannot buy new appliances, furniture, clothing, cars, or go out to eat, etc., the revenues from sales taxes has really declined.
Yes, we need to do emergency bailouts for the very low wages, and frequently employers give across-thhe-board $400 increases to try to help out the lower levels more. However, the middle and upper wage earners are also very important for purchasing goods and services that help dirve the local economy and provide jobs. A better fix would be to work to raise ALL WAGES in the area. With higher wages, we can attract and retain a higher caliper of employee at all levels. Higher wages at all levels will increase the ability for discretionary spending and help bring more jobs. Higher wages for all will help increase tax revenues for better infrastructure and services from local governments. Higher wages for all will help improve the cultural opportunities and raise the standard of living for all persons in the area.
You cannot make chicken salad from chicken poop.
A rising tide lifts all ships.
The very low wages in this region are really holding down the growth potential, and as buying power erodes, the standard of living and quality of life for all contiues to decline.
The mulitiple tax increases being talked about are all going to fail. People are tapped out. Families are really struggling. People just simply cannot pay any more.
The majority of people in Jefferson City are very poor. Poverty rates continue to climb.
The focus of local governments and the Chamber of Commerce needs to be on raising wages for all workers. Until we can make significant increases in how much people can make, things around here will continue to rot and decay. Taxes will not be approved. Revenues for governments will decline. Infrastructure and services will continue to rot. No body benefits from a bottom of the barrel economy.
kentheco 3 months ago
For years, the State of Missouri gave “dollar amount” based raises. It was only later, that those of top began to notice that they were not keeping ahead of their employees (the ones that do the actual work) and so began the percentage based raise. This resulting percentage based raises disproportionately benefit the people who already make the most and do little to help those with the greatest need. You mentioned that families do not have nearly as much money available to spend on “non-essentials”; I am more concerned about those at the bottom of the pay scale that cannot afford the “essentials” (food, utilities, insurance, and transportation). I am sorry that those at the top will not be able to take that trip or buy the big screen television, but until those that need it most are provided for, those better off will have to suffer along with the rest of us.
JCLifer 3 months ago
Salaries should not be thought of as welfare. They are really payment for services performed. The "need" of the person getting the salary is pretty much irrelevent to policies to keep wages competitive with the marketplace. In a perfect world, the employee would have control over the level of compensation they received. They could gain experience or additional education to rise to a higher level, or if they were lazy or satisfied with where they were, they could just stay at their low level and keep their low pay.
What matters is paying enough to attract good enough folks to work at every level. If they don't pay enough, folks will go somewhere else in theroy, but when the largest employer has a virtual monopoly on jobs in the area, the amount they pay pretty much sets the pay levels for everyone else in the region. It is hard for employees to move around and better themselves in a monopolistic environment.
What is interesting is that several agencies are able to continually "promote" their employees to new classifications or at least raise them a couple of steps on the salary chart each year. These agencies have figured out how to give their workers the 5% or more raises every year to attract and retain the best and the brightest. Other agencies have very flat organizational charts and do not promote their employees or use the steps in the pay scale. These employees are subject to the annual whims of the legislature and governor for a meager cost of living raise. It is too bad that state government cannot get its act together and develop and stick to a compensation policy that works for all agencies. Why are some agencies allowed to give frequent promotions to nearly all their employees, and other agencies don't seem to have that ability? Why are agencies allowed to cut their workforce and load the remaining employees with two or more jobs worth of work, without giving them even a bit of a raise or promotion?
PatsyDecline 3 months ago
What small business owner in their right mind would invest in a community like Jefferson City when you have Columbia right up the road??
JC...where the TPTB are still arguing over how big to make the new massive HS prison complex while CoMO is opening their new 3rd HS.
JC....where the LEO are busy writing parking and speeding tickets...filling up their shiny new massive jail with to keep the fuel flowing to the new fleet of Tahoes...and the violent crime is just going up and up and up.
JC....where any new business that dares threaten the power base of the JC elites is attacked and hounded.
Nope. We saw enough. Closed the JC office permanently and sold all RE holdings the end of last year. Good bye and good riddance.
JCLifer 3 months ago
It is time for the elite good ol boys who run this town to start paying their fair share. If they want a conf erence center and transformation they can pay for it.
The avg taxpayer doesnt benefit as much from city taxe as the elite good ol boys do.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID