Kraus renews effort to end front license plate
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Will the third time be the charm for state Sen. Will Kraus’ efforts to remove the front license plate from Missouri vehicles?
“It would save the state about $1.5 million,” Kraus, R-Lee’s Summit, told the Senate’s Transportation Committee Wednesday morning. “The thing that’s important since I filed this bill is, the cost of the license plates have gone up — 20 cents last year, to $1.63 (per plate), a 14 percent increase.”
Kraus noted that 19 other U.S. states don’t require license plates on the front and back of each vehicle.
“Five are neighboring states — Kansas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Tennessee and Kentucky,” he explained. “I know law enforcement is opposed to this.
“The simple fact is, with 19 states that only require the rear license plate, we have seen no evidence that really hampers their ability” to enforce laws.
But Kraus was the only voice supporting the idea.
Florida also is a rear-plate-only state, said Wentzville Police Chief Lisa Harrison, who came to Missouri from Florida.
“It’s far easier to do law enforcement in the state of Missouri with that front license plate,” she said.
“That license plate is caught on cameras — not necessarily cameras put up by the state, but ATMs, at banks, convenience stores.”
Because Florida court rulings kept officers, and neighbors, from going on someone’s property just to look at a license plate, Harrison said, “criminals would back into their driveways” so their license plate numbers couldn’t be checked.
“It’s very easy to hide one tag as opposed to two,” she added.
Michael Halford of the Missouri State Troopers Association told the committee: “The front license plate sometimes is used to develop probable cause” for a traffic stop.
“Most likely, it is going to be used to help solve crime, identify subjects — removal of that front license plate will cut in half the opportunity for witnesses, victims and officers to identify the proper vehicle.”
Halford also said in hit-and-run collisions, it is the front license plate that gets left behind.
Sheldon Lineback, Missouri Police Chiefs Association director, reminded the committee “31 states still do have the two-plate license system.”
He said having two plates especially is helpful for things like Amber Alerts, and it is easier to identify stolen vehicles.
“All these reasons, we feel, outweigh the concept of the savings,” Lineback said, also questioning the predicted savings because “the citizens are still going to pay the same amount they now pay for two plates, for one plate.”
The committee took no action Wednesday on Kraus’ bill.

Comments
wow 3 months, 1 week ago
Mr. Watson...before you start shooting your mouth off about what the cops can or cannot do..."put yourself in their shoes" get your self off that cushy couch or desk chair and go out on the ride with a cop and experience what they are. Then pehpaps you'll see that the two license plate requirment isn't something to be taken lighly. Go out and do you own study and then make a decision. But just sitting on your butt and accepting the paper's being pushed accross your desk doesn't make you a politician that is trying to do something right...which could help people....no ...sitting on your butt, spouting off like you are...just makes you a politician and not a good one either!
online_editor 3 months, 1 week ago
Did you mean to address that to Sen. Kraus? He's the politician proposing to reduce to one plate.
gitrdone 1 month, 1 week ago
Mr. Wow, before you start shooting your mouth off about the writer of this article..."put yourself in his shoes". Bob did not insert his own opinion in this article at all. It's a compilation of quotes from Kraus and a police chief.
If the plate requirement isn't something to be taken lightly, then why do 19 states not have a two plate requirement? Is it not something to be taken lightly for them? Where is your empirical evidence that having the two plate system works better than not? Get off that cushy couch or desk chair and show me some proof yourself.
RobHunterJohnson 3 months, 1 week ago
Add 20 cents to the bill! rob
Not_Sure 3 months, 1 week ago
Does anyone know why large pickups over a certain weight or something are exempt from rear licence plates? I asked my local senator last year, who couldn't find anyone who knew how that came to be.
JCLifer 3 months, 1 week ago
License plates on the front are a waste. They are added expense for little benefit. Many cars lose aerodynamic efficiency with an ugly license plate on the front.
Missouri needs to join the modern times and get rid of the front plate like most of the otehr states have done.
I agree with Not Sure that all pickups should have a rear plate. Makes no sense to exempt the larger ones. They have a bracket and a light for the plate- they need to have a plate.
jcperson 3 months, 1 week ago
They are exempt because they are licensed to pull a trailor. When a trailor is hooked up, the plate cannot be seen. We also pay $2500 for the plate on our big truck. I would gladly put one on the rear if it was only around $50 like every one else.
yamahamian 3 months, 1 week ago
Well, if I was paying an extra $2,500 for the plate on my big truck, I'd be demanding I get two plates like everyone else - discrimination!!
muleman 3 months, 1 week ago
A rear plate on a truck puling a trailer is worthless
JCLifer 3 months, 1 week ago
Yep, but that is why the trailer also has a plate. What about when the truck is not pulling a trailer? A rear plate would be just as useful as the rear plate on every other vehicle.
It makes no sense.
A little S10 pickup can pull a trailer, but it is still required to have a rear plate on the truck. What is the difference?
JCLifer 1 month, 1 week ago
Silly laws that need to be fixed. Get rid of all front plates and require a rear plate on all vehicles.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID