Transgender people contest NYC birth-record rule
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
NEW YORK (AP) — Joann Prinzivalli has gone through a lot to be a woman, and she wants her birth certificate to show it.
Born Paul Prinzivalli Jr., she says she knew her true identity was female by the time she was 4 and broached the subject with a mental-health adviser as a teenager. But it was decades before she bucked family expectations and social pressures, changed her name and underwent electrolysis and hormone treatment to make a change that cost Prinzivalli her spouse, family, home and job.
About 10 years later, she’s still a man in one important context: on her birth certificate. She’s been unable to change the gender listed on the document because of city rules that she and some other transgender people call discriminatory, intrusive and out of step with recent moves by the federal government and some states to make it easier for transgender people to change ID documents.
“Knowing that it was a mistake in the first place, and having that fixed, is pretty important to me,” the 57-year-old title insurance lawyer said Monday as she sued the city. Two other transgender people have filed similar suits in recent days, and a third plans to do so.
They are contesting a city Health Department practice of requiring people to undergo genital surgery and a post-surgery psychiatric evaluation before changing the gender on their birth certificates, according to the lawsuits. Many transgender people can’t have that surgery for medical or financial reasons, and having hormone or other treatment to change gender should be enough, the plaintiffs say.
City lawyers say officials are trying to make sure there are checks on changing an important identity document used for citizenship, Social Security and passport purposes.
“Although we understand the concerns ... the Board of Health should not change its requirements without assurance that the amended certificate cannot be misused,” said Gabriel Taussig, a city lawyer. He was responding to a lawsuit filed Monday by Louis Birney, a 70-year-old transgender man. Birney had genital surgery but objects to the requirements for detailed documentation and a psychiatric report, calling them violations of medical privacy.
Updating ID documents has long been an issue for transgender people. Varying local, state and federal rules sometimes mean a person’s sex changes from birth certificate to driver’s license to passport. The patchwork result can cause a host of problems in a security-conscious time when IDs are increasingly demanded and scrutinized, whether for boarding a plane or getting a job.
Transgender-rights advocates have encouraged agencies to abandon surgical requirements for changing identity documents, with some results.
Washington state requires only a doctor’s or psychologist’s note attesting to “appropriate clinical treatment” to change the gender on a driver’s license. Illinois agreed in 2009 to develop new standards for how much surgery is required before a person is eligible to switch the gender of a birth certificate. And the U.S. State Department announced last year that transgender travelers no longer will need surgery — just a doctor’s certification of appropriate treatment — to declare a new gender on a passport.
“Agencies are recognizing that the appropriate standard is that a physician who is actually treating you says you have transitioned,” said Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality. The organization isn’t involved in the recent New York City lawsuits.
In 2006, city health officials considered dropping their requirement for sex-change surgery before switching a birth certificate’s gender. They ultimately decided not to; the health commissioner said the issue needed further study. The agency referred questions Tuesday about the issue to city lawyers.
The state Health Department, which sets birth-certificate policies for areas outside the city, also requires detailed reports of genital surgeries and a psychological report to change the gender on the documents.
The lawsuits say the city discriminates against transgender people by requiring more of them than it does of others who wish to correct birth certificates. Parents trying to fix a mistake in listing a child’s sex need only a letter from the birth hospital, the suits say.
At 30, Sam Berkley has had surgery — a double mastectomy — to become the man he has sensed himself to be since childhood. His New York driver’s license says he’s male, and he’s getting a passport.
But the city has turned down his requests to change his birth certificate, saying he failed to provide proof of sex-change surgery, though he submitted a doctor’s statement saying he’d had irreversible surgery and had “completed sex reassignment,” according to a lawsuit Berkley filed Friday through the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund. It also represents Prinzivalli.
“I don’t feel comfortable with the government deciding whether I’m a man or not,” Berkley said Monday.
His female birth certificate caused humiliating confusion when he applied for health insurance at a new job, Berkley said. Patricia Harrington, who also plans to sue, said her birth certificate caused problems when she moved out of New York and tried to get a new driver’s license.
Harrington, 58, began to live as a woman in her 40s after struggling with her identity since childhood.
“It’s been a long journey for me,” Harrington said. “I would just like my identification to reflect who I am.”

Comments
bndyvcky 2 years, 1 month ago
I pray those officials never change these procedures.
tonto 2 years, 1 month ago
vickie, you and I and most people have no dog in that fight. What does it matter to you whether someone else can get their documents fixed? How perverse is it to pray for someone else's continued misery?
tonto 2 years, 1 month ago
Public records are not sacred, and the public does not have any legitimate interest in what a baby's crotch looked like at birth. Another poster has offered examples of cases in which birth certificates are routinely changed on request. There are also instances where a baby has some indeterminate combination of male and female parts. It's not common but it happens, and the attending medical staff make an arbitrary decision about the gender of the child.
tonto 2 years, 1 month ago
You (still) haven't given anyone a reason to agree with you that birth certificates should never be changed. History, which seems to be your fallback position, might be ok but that's not enough in cases of adoption or identification of the father after paternity testing, and a few other situations.
Hospitals do not normally perform any genetic testing on babies, they just go by appearance. It's not very scientific at all, and I am sure you are aware that other types of records are changed all the time. Would you want your new drivers license to be a supplement to the one you got when you were sixteen?
Finally, the medical term hermaphrodite does not go on a birth certificate. They decide on male or female and then do surgery.
tonto 2 years, 1 month ago
Common sense, in your opinion, and unnecessary, in your opinion. So it comes down to because you say so. Glad you clarified that.
tonto 2 years, 1 month ago
It's a good thing you are so modest about it.
TheRickster 2 years, 1 month ago
He ll must have frozen over,,because I have for the first time had to agree with her, or him? Which are you Graceful? A birth certificate is what you were at time of birth. So genetalia and all else considered you WERE born it what is says!
JMO 2 years, 1 month ago
The first sentence I wrote here was that I agreed as well! I didn't think that would ever happen. My thinking was, if there's going to be anything, there should be a second record created a "certificate of changed sex"? Not a change to the birth certificate.
Of course, by that logic, my son should still have his deceased father's name on his birth certificate, notwithstanding that he was adopted at the age of 7 by my second husband. Also, parent's are allowed to change a child's name on a birth certificate and in fact, my father-in-law, at over 60 years of age, changed his own name on his by filing a paper with BVR; his birth certificate had a shortened form of the name he'd used his whole life. So...maybe it's not so clear cut? I don't know exactly where I stand on this having had that thought, so consider me Devil's advocate here.
Perhaps every change on a birth certificate, from change of name to change of parent to change of sex, should be allowed, but with a notation of what was amended?
tonto 2 years, 1 month ago
Graceful has spoken. All hail Graceful and Graceful's infinite wisdom.
tonto 2 years, 1 month ago
That one's easy. We'd have a cranky, forgetful old man in the White House and a harpie presiding over the US Senate. Three hundred million people would pray every night to keep McCain alive another day.
JCLifer 2 years, 1 month ago
I don't care who ya are, that's funny right there
asb 2 years, 1 month ago
Oh that's good. My that's good.
asb 2 years, 1 month ago
Brain bomb that ol' Joe is, he's still a safer VP than Mama bear.
tonto 2 years, 1 month ago
Always lead with the buzzwords. You meant to say job killing left leaning haters, didn't you?
TheRickster 2 years, 1 month ago
Sorry Graceful,,but from what I read, your batting average is under par and should be traded or benched!
TheRickster 2 years, 1 month ago
When you have such a bias and no solutions,,YOU are part of the problem.
sillyrabbit 2 years, 1 month ago
I'm not sure which is sadder, people with nothing better to do then worry about what the sex on their birth certificate says (I haven't looked at my BC in ages) or people who worry about people who worry about what their BC says.
soxfan 2 years, 1 month ago
i agree with most of the folks that the birth certificate should be what you were at your birth because you may want to change to ?????? later don l chicago
asb 2 years, 1 month ago
Some infants' sex does change naturally after birth. Some BCs are in error about date, parents, hospital, etc. When GRACEFUL says NEVER, my toes curl. You can tell when Grace is being absolutist and wrong based on religious and political horse radish, the lips are moving. You know we're working toward a Birther tussle here, Grace won't be able to resist saying that if some sexual deviate is allowed to re-write history, then some foriegn, Islamo-facist destroyer-of-America can finish the job of filthing our soil that the liberal destroyers started back in the day . . .
asb 2 years, 1 month ago
Not really, just defending my country against extremism . . .
asb 2 years, 1 month ago
Thanks
justaword 2 years, 1 month ago
How many warmed-over, half-baked John Birchers and transgender birth certificate changers can dance on the head of a pin?
online_editor 2 years, 1 month ago
Everyone, please stick to posting your opinions and observations about issues related to the article and drop all personal jabs at other participants. Thank you. --Rick Brown, online editor, News Tribune
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID