Bill would allow vouchers for private schools

For 140 years, Missouri’s Constitution has prohibited using any public money to benefit private or parochial schools.

But freshman state Rep. Jay Barnes, R-Jefferson City, wants the Legislature to ask voters to change that.

“This amendment would delete from our Constitution an anti-Catholic provision that was placed there over 100 years ago,” Barnes told the House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee on Tuesday morning, “and replace (it) with a provision ensuring that every parent and child in our state has the same opportunity currently enjoyed by wealthy Missourians, to send their children to any accredited school of their choosing.”

He noted that 20 U.S. states, and a number of other nations, “have programs that provide for school choice in one way or another. ... Our country has existed for 224 years with an economy that’s grown to be the strongest in the world, based on market forces.

“There’s no reason that market forces can’t be used to improve our education system.”

Among those supporting Barnes’ proposal was Joseph Gulino, principal of Jefferson City’s St. Peter Catholic School.

“The passage of this bill would, hopefully, would lead to some kind of financial aid (I like the idea of tax credits to parents),” he said, “and many of our parents are of not-great financial means.”

By allowing parochial parents to use some of their tax money for their children’s education, he added, other parishioners would have a reduced burden of helping pay for the Catholic schools through their church donations, “which can free up more money from the parishioners to contribute to their local economies and to benefit and do good things for their local communities.”

Don Rehagen of Jefferson City, father of two Helias High School students and two younger children at St. Peter’s, told the committee: “(We) figure that we’ve spent over $15,000 a year in tuition and support to our children’s schools,” and that money could impact their children’s ability to go to college.

Rehagen noted about 3,000 children living in the Jefferson City Public School District attend parochial or private schools.

“We feel that the local public schools in Jefferson City are some of the best in the state,” he said. “We do not want to see the local public schools harmed.”

Mike Hoey, director of the Missouri Catholic Conference, agreed.

But, he added: “If you look at Europe, the way think about public education is much broader than the way we think about it in this country — they think about public education being for all kids.”

If the Missouri Constitution is changed, Hoey said, “The state of Missouri could be much more flexible about how they deal with private school children and these federal education programs.”

The Missouri School Boards Association has a “long-standing resolution against using public money for non-public schools,” President David Wright of Blue Springs said.

“Public schools are accountable to taxpayers through their locally elected boards of education,” he said. “The private, religious schools are not accountable to taxpayers and, therefore, should not have access to taxpayer dollars.”

Missouri National Education Association lobbyist Otto Fajen said changing the Constitution would mean the state would be “taking on the responsibility of education for at least 100,000 more students” who now attend non-public schools.

One sticking point for lawmakers could be the proposal’s fiscal note, which was listed as ranging from $0 to $318 million.

Penny Rector, lobbyist for the Missouri School Administrators Coalition and some of the Kansas City area schools, told the committee the fiscal note likely is too low.

Using the state’s current school funding formula, she said, the additional cost “will be in excess of $750 million.”

But, if the statewide average cost for educating students is $9,000 per student each year, “that puts us over $1 billion. ... If we’re going to go down this road, you’ll have to find some substantial revenue streams to be able to support an amendment such as this.”

Comments

Daddy 2 years, 3 months ago

How wonderful! It is about time that all students are given the option to get a higher caliber education with private schools. I took my daughter out of JC schools and in 7th grade at St. Joes she was doing what my nephew was doing as a senior at Jeff City High. Public education has become awash with teachers that just do enough to get by and don't care about the kids!

0

Rison 2 years, 3 months ago

Many teachers want to do more but are handcuffed and beaten down by the system. I do agree, though, a lot of others are apathetic

0

wcywing 2 years, 3 months ago

maybe the system makes the teachers apathetic?

0

Rison 2 years, 3 months ago

Some, yes. But a lot of people are just that way naturally.

0

bluesfan13 2 years, 3 months ago

And then how long until a similar bill is passed allowing the transfer of public funds from State Universities to private universities?

0

wcywing 2 years, 3 months ago

what are the chances of this being passed?

0

wcywing 2 years, 3 months ago

that makes sense, considering Bush wanted a voucher system and MO voted for him twice. i hope it passes.

0

rmsberengaria 2 years, 3 months ago

Bush did institute a voucher system. It was working great. The inner city parents who cared where getting their children out of failing drug infected schools, such as Washington DC, and enrolling them in better public schools or private or the better magnet school, with the voicher it was the parents choice. Along came Obama and paid back his NEA buddies and stopped the voucher program and forced all the underprivaledged students right back into the failing schools. Many inner city black folks their children where scared to death for the safety of their children. the culture is if you excel your not black your a Uncle Tom if you learn. How shameful of Obama!

0

3blindmice 2 years, 3 months ago

I think its a wonderful idea. We could use this for the new islamic school as well correct?

0

wcywing 2 years, 3 months ago

if you can use it for a Catholic school, than it would stand to reason you can use it for any other religious school. assuming it passes whatever other requirements there are to use the vouchers for the school.

0

rmsberengaria 2 years, 3 months ago

Of course if it teachs the core state mandated curriculum of subjects and abides by the days in class and so forth. If you mean a school that teaches only religious instruction and such... as the madras's do in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia NO! Any school that does not provide the core basic education requirements should not have any certification anyways.

0

JCLifer 2 years, 3 months ago

Why should the state be involved in education in the first place? Why is educating children not the responsibility of parents? If a parent wants their child to succeed in life and to be educated, let the parents find the appropriate (private) school and let the parents pay for it. Why should everyone pay taxes to educated other people's children?

0

bluesfan13 2 years, 3 months ago

Because at some point in time, it was decided that it was better for society to mandate education. That's like asking why the State should be involved with welfare, medicare, mental health, etc. Those are all (arguably) things that "should" be the responsiblity of family members.

0

JCLifer 2 years, 3 months ago

Well, eiher the state should do it or not. I see lots of trouble when you start mixing tax dollars between public and private schools. Either fix it or shut it down.

0

TraceyT 2 years, 3 months ago

JCLifer, I completely agree. However, "shutting it down" is not a feasible option, because it will never happen if for no other reason than government run schools and their supporters will never admit failure and allow it to happen (as it is generally against human nature to admit failure).

0

Gotigers 2 years, 3 months ago

I agree with this. If a tax paying parent wishes to send their child to a private school then they should be able to have some of their taxes sent to what they believe in. The public schools used to be a great place until the lawyers and judges started tieing the teachers hands as to what they can do. Sad.

0

TraceyT 2 years, 3 months ago

As long as the private school is teaching the mandated curriculum, I don't understand why this should be an issue. The only logical reason that I can see to oppose this on a personal level is if "I don't agree with what that private school is teaching".

0

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting