Gingrich’s rise puzzles critics of his record
Saturday, December 10, 2011
WASHINGTON (AP) — Newt Gingrich’s rapid rise in presidential polls has left veteran Republicans scratching their heads, and not just because he vaulted from far back to lead Mitt Romney in several key states.
They’re trying to figure out why the former House speaker is supported by GOP voters who think he’s not particularly honest and doesn’t share their values. They’re puzzled that Iowa evangelical Christians are flocking to a man who was unfaithful to two wives, paid $300,000 in House ethics fines and converted to Roman Catholicism.
They’re surprised Republican voters say they value Gingrich’s experience far more than that of his rivals. Gingrich’s record of earning millions of dollars in the government influence business, after 20 years in Congress, seems to upend the notion this election cycle is driven by tea partyers’ hostility to Washington insiders.
“I can’t decipher what’s going on,” said Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., one the tea party’s best-known first-term lawmakers.
“I’ve had a little trouble figuring it out, too,” said Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, one of Congress’ most conservative members.
Fueling the perplexity are three independent polls of Iowa Republicans, who will hold their caucus Jan. 3. They show Gingrich leading, with Romney and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas battling for second, and four others trailing.
Republican elected officials and strategists offer an array of theories, with varying degrees of confidence.
One school holds that Gingrich articulates conservative positions so forcefully that he attracts hard-right voters willing to overlook his record of inconsistencies and foibles. While many people see Gingrich as a consummate Washington insider — making $1.6 million advising Freddie Mac, for instance — his sharply anti-Washington rhetoric and unorthodox views convince others he’s willing to buck the system and make needed changes.
Another theory, however, suggests many Republicans simply don’t know much about Gingrich, 68, whose greatest political triumph was 17 years ago when he rose to become House speaker. Voters may be unaware of his repeated clashes with fellow Republicans, or his 1995 complaint about being seated in the back of Air Force One. Gingrich said the “snub” contributed to that year’s budget impasse with President Bill Clinton and the unpopular government shutdown that followed.
With Gingrich, “the message resonates more than the record,” said Mark Meckler, a co-founder of Tea Party Patriots. Gingrich is skilled at synthesizing and expressing conservatives’ goals and anger, Meckler said. But he also has “a long history that’s hard to explain away.”
If that’s true, it’s possible the attacks being launched against Gingrich, mainly by Paul and groups backing Romney, will take a big toll before the Iowa caucus and the Jan. 10 New Hampshire primary.
It’s also possible, some GOP analysts say, the attacks will endear Gingrich to conservatives more than ever. Romney has struggled for months to rise above 30 percent in Republican horserace polls.
The obvious hunger for a non-Romney candidate could anoint Gingrich if he’s the last rival standing after others have fallen.
Issues and questions raised by the three polls of Iowa Republicans include:
Separate surveys for The Des Moines Register and New York Times-CBS News showed Gingrich with an overwhelming lead on the question of which Republican has the best experience to be president and handle world crises.
That raises serious doubts about Romney’s strategy. The former one-term Massachusetts governor says his decades as a businessman are preferable to the background of someone who “has spent the last 40 years in Washington.”
Romney’s campaign this week brought out former congressional colleagues of Gingrich who said he was divisive and erratic in his four years as House speaker.
Even his toughest critics generally praise Gingrich for leading the 1994 GOP takeover of the House. But they note his tempestuous time as party leader led to a failed Republican coup attempt in 1997, and then his departure from office after the disappointing 1998 elections.
Other Gingrich critics are trying to remind voters he has favored bank bailouts, an individual mandate to buy health insurance and a bipartisan push to combat climate change. They highlight the millions of dollars he made in the Washington influence world, including his contract with Freddie Mac, a mortgage backer he publicly criticized.
Two decades in Congress, followed by big paychecks from special interest groups, would hardly seem the type of resume embraced by tea party activists. But King, the Iowa conservative, said staunch conservatives know some level of government experience is needed to change federal policies.
“The anti-Washington part of the tea party seems to have diminished a little bit,” King said. “They’ve become more sophisticated. They have a better understanding of how Washington works.”
VALUES vs IDEAS.
The Times-CBS poll asked Iowa Republicans to name the candidate that best represents “the values you try to live by.” Rep. Michele Bachmann, Paul and Romney were bunched near the top, although no one was chosen by more than 19 percent of the respondents. Gingrich finished fourth, at 11 percent.
A Washington Post-ABC News poll found only 13 percent of likely Iowa caucusgoers see Gingrich as the most honest and trustworthy in the field, also a fourth-place showing. Yet Gingrich easily leads on the “who would you vote for” question.
Gingrich may have struck a nerve with voters by saying the 2012 election against President Barack Obama will be a campaign of ideas. Curt Levey, who heads the conservative Committee for Justice, said Gingrich recently told a private gathering of activists in Washington, “Don’t support me, support my ideas.”
In the Des Moines Register poll, Gingrich finished sixth on the question of which candidate is “most likeable.” But he was the overwhelming choice as “best debater.” He has challenged Obama to seven three-hour debates in the Lincoln-Douglas mold.
Veteran politicians sometimes roll their eyes when Gingrich unspools yet another round of ideas, which have included “a massive new program to build a permanent lunar colony to exploit the Moon’s resources.”
Iowa Republicans, at least for now, seem drawn to his intellect and ideas.
In the Times-CBS poll in Iowa, Gingrich held a 2-to-1 lead over his nearest rival, Paul, among white evangelicals. He held a 3-to-1 lead over Romney, a Mormon.
Gingrich’s acknowledged infidelities and two divorces are well documented. He was having an affair with a House staffer, now his wife, when he pushed for Clinton’s impeachment over the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
Romney’s latest TV ad notes he has been married to the same woman for 42 years. Republican strategists are divided on the likely impact of such messages. Some think religious conservatives will turn against Gingrich when they learn more details of his past. Others think these voters might embrace Gingrich’s story of contrition and hoped-for redemption.
In the Times-CBS poll, nearly half of Iowa Republicans said it’s more important to pick a nominee who can beat Obama than to have one who agrees with them on the issues. Gingrich has a 23-point lead among these voters: 43 percent to Romney’s 20 percent.
Yet most polls show Obama faring better against Gingrich than against Romney in hypothetical match-ups in key states. The findings puzzle some GOP insiders.
Voters sometimes express conflicting views, they note. And voters might believe Gingrich is stronger, or will become stronger, than the polls suggest.
Meckler, the tea party activist, thinks close and literal readings of the Iowa poll results can give a misleading picture of the contest. He also noted that Rudy Giuliani led the GOP field at this point four years ago, only to collapse.
He thinks many Republicans are embracing Gingrich’s robust attacks on institutions they dislike, such as the news media and congressional wheeling and dealing.
“The way he pushes back against the press is very appealing to a lot of people,” Meckler said. “People feel like he speaks for them.”
When Gingrich used “stupid” to describe the bipartisan “supercommittee,” which failed to break the political logjam on deficit spending, he expressed “our feelings exactly,” Meckler said. “We knew it would fail. It was fake.”
Meckler said such bombastic, anti-establishment language helps Gingrich obscure his history of cutting deals and pushing agendas as a lawmaker and well-paid consultant. “There is a disconnect between that and his long-term record,” Meckler said.
Romney’s goal in the next few weeks, either directly or through third parties, is to make that connection for voters in Iowa, New Hampshire and beyond.
Gingrich “is not a reliable or trustworthy leader,” Jim Talent, a Republican who served with Gingrich in the House, said in a Romney-sponsored conference call Thursday.
The campaign will test whether conservative voters will overlook such barbs and embrace Gingrich’s ideas and in-your-face rhetoric.
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting