Obama sets campaign theme: Middle class at stake
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
OSAWATOMIE, Kan. (AP) — Declaring the American middle class in jeopardy, President Barack Obama on Tuesday outlined a populist economic vision that will drive his re-election bid, insisting the United States must reclaim its standing as a country in which everyone can prosper if provided “a fair shot and a fair share.”
While never making an overt plea for a second term, Obama’s offered his most comprehensive lines of attack against the candidates seeking to take his job, only a month before Republican voters begin choosing a presidential nominee. He also sought to inject some of the long-overshadowed hope that energized his 2008 campaign, saying: “I believe America is on its way up.”
In small-town Osawatomie, in a high school gym where patriotic bunting lined the bleachers, Obama presented himself as the one fighting for shared sacrifice and success against those who would gut government and let people fend for themselves. He did so knowing the nation is riven over the question of whether economic opportunity for all is evaporating.
“Throughout the country, it’s sparked protests and political movements, from the tea party to the people who’ve been occupying the streets of New York and other cities,” Obama said.
“This is the defining issue of our time,” he said in echoing President Theodore Roosevelt’s famous speech here in 1910.
“This is a make-or-break moment for the middle class and all those who are fighting to get into the middle class,” Obama said. “At stake is whether this will be a country where working people can earn enough to raise a family, build a modest savings, own a home and secure their retirement.”
For Obama, saddled with a weak national economic recovery, the speech was a chance to break away from Washington’s incremental battles and his own small-scale executive actions. He offered a sweeping indictment of economic inequality and unleashed his own brand of prairie populism.
He spoke for nearly an hour to a supportive audience, reselling his ideas under the framework of “building a nation where we’re all better off.”
Billed as an important address that would put today’s economic debates in context, Obama’s speech seemed a bit like two packaged into one.
The first was that of the campaigner, full of loft and reclamation of American values. The second was the governing Obama, who recited his familiar jobs agenda, his feud with Congress over extending a Social Security tax cut, even his fight to get his consumer watchdog confirmed.
Obama tied himself to Roosevelt, the president and reformer who came to this town in eastern Kansas and called for a “square deal” for regular Americans. Roosevelt said then the fight for progress was a conflict “between the men who possess more than they have earned and the men who have earned more than they possess.”
It is a theme Obama is embracing in a mounting fight for re-election against Republicans who, regardless of the nominee, will attack his stewardship of the economy.
One of the leading contenders for the GOP nomination, Mitt Romney, ridiculed Obama for comparing himself to Roosevelt.
Obama “said that he is like Teddy Roosevelt,” Romney said at a campaign event in Paradise Valley, Ariz. “And I thought, ‘In what way is he like Teddy Roosevelt?’ Teddy Roosevelt of course founded the Bull Moose Party. One of those words applies.”
Kirsten Kukowski, spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, said, “Maybe instead of trying to be like other presidents, Obama should try being president.”
Obama took aim at the Republicans, saying they would only return the same structures that led to America’s economic downturn. “Their philosophy is simple: We are better off when everyone is left to fend for themselves and play by their own rules,” Obama said. “I’m here to say they are wrong.”
The president conceded that the country is in the midst of a consuming re-examination on his watch, prompting national movements against both government spending and an economy that many feel disproportionately favors the elite. Obama went on the offensive about income equality, saying it distorts democracy and derails the American dream.
Responding to those who want to cut taxes and regulation in the belief success will trickle down, Obama said: “Here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It’s never worked.”
Obama noted that Theodore Roosevelt was called a “radical, a socialist, even a communist” for putting forth ideas in his last campaign such as an eight-hour work day, a minimum wage for women, unemployment insurance and a progressive income tax.
Left unsaid: Roosevelt’s Bull Moose campaign in 1912 failed to return him to the White House.
Obama attempted to sum up the pain and peril for a society where the middle class is struggling. But he also called for individual responsibility.
“In the end,” he said, “rebuilding this economy based on fair play, a fair shot and a fair share will require all of us to see the stake we have in each other’s success.”
Obama also challenged he big banks that took bailouts from American taxpayers, pointing to “a deficit of trust between Main Street and Wall Street.” He said banks that were bailed out had an obligation to work to close that trust deficit and should be doing more to help remedy past mortgage abuses and assist middle-class taxpayers.
———
Ben Feller contributed from Washington. AP writers Erica Werner and Kasie Hunt contributed to this report.

Comments
wyriontair 1 year, 6 months ago
Once again, the president plays the class warfare card. He's tried to tie his policies to Lincoln, Truman, Clinton, and now Roosevelt. He believes that "liberty" doesn't work and we should become a Nationalist Socialist country. Our country was not founded on National Socialism, it was founded on Freedom. The freedom to make our own decisions, to live our lives as we see fit, to do well or to fail and try again. So far this president and the Democrats have been slowly trying to end the righs we have under the Constitution and BIll of Rights It's time people take off those "rose-colored glasses" and see what their agenda is.
xhepera 1 year, 6 months ago
You invoke national socialism. Stay classy. You've trumped Godwin's Law. Look it up. As for rose-colored glasses, I think it's time for the middle class to see what the agenda of the current, obstructionist Republican party is, that being the destruction of the welfare of the middle class as a burnt offering to corporate interests.
tonto_goldberg 1 year, 6 months ago
So the middle class is supposed to just roll over and close their eyes while the GOP conducts their "not class warfare"? Do you have a better name for it than class warfare?
JCLifer 1 year, 6 months ago
My Canadian friends tell me that theis socialized medicine system is fine for those who don't get sick. However, if they need hospitalization, the system only covers bare basics. Want a semi-private room? Pay more out of pocket. Want a TV in the room? Pay more out of pocket. Want a phone in your room? Pay more out of pocket. Forget anything elective. Forget state of the art diagnosis or treatment. Forget going in the hospital right away-- got to wait in the lengthy que for your turn.
Socialized medicine sounds like a great step backward, especially when the Canadians are crossing the border to get better and newer treatment.
Sequoia 1 year, 6 months ago
This country was founded on the idea of "a more perfect union," that would "establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity." Can you tell me precisely what constitutional rights you've lost recently?
asb 1 year, 6 months ago
The middle class is growing, there are more opportunities than ever, the wealthy are acting in the best interests of America rather than themselves, we need fewer restrictions on how the most money is extracted from the largest number of wallets by any means . . . keep marching and shut up.
evenkeel 1 year, 6 months ago
Is this reportage or opinion? "He did so knowing the nation is riven over the question of whether economic opportunity for all is evaporating." Riven? 1. To rend or tear apart. 2. To break into pieces, as by a blow; cleave or split asunder. 3. To break or distress (the spirit, for example).
Really? The nation is riven...? Are we about to tear apart? Hyperbole much, AP?
We certainly have problems, real serious problems. but nothing the election in 2012 cannot solve. We need a different President. The one we have is a failure.
Hey AP,KenThomas and Ben Feller, how about REPORTING on the existential threat to economic prosperity when a nation is burdened with a crushing $15 TRILLION debt and yearly deficits of +$1 TRILLION. Or you could slyly slip in another opinion. I suggest this: Obama is a feckless leader that wants to redistribute wealth and stoke class envy.
tonto_goldberg 1 year, 6 months ago
"existential?"
evenkeel 1 year, 6 months ago
asb, how are the wealthy supposed to act in the best interests of America? What actions should the wealthy be taking that they are not taking? What actions should they cease?
asb 1 year, 6 months ago
Pay their fair share of the cost of government, you know, taxes. Congress extended the massive tax cuts put in place during better economic times for the GOP's primary tiny constituency, but won't do so for the payroll tax cuts put in place for working folks. Yes, it would be a re-distribution of wealth, back to what has been more typical of the previous decades.
JCLifer 1 year, 6 months ago
The wealthy already pay the majority of taxes in this country. What do you consider to be "their fair share"?
asb 1 year, 6 months ago
I don't think it's inaccurate to say we are politically riven, given the polarization in place presently. Look, if you steal slowly enough nobody gripes, but the excesses of the past decade of de-regulated financial thieves has caught up with them. Obama's "failure" is the GOP's being hijacked by two groups, one 300 years ago (money) and the other fear and paranoia (the teaparty). So now congress is owned by thieves and cornered by snarling teaparty freshmen into refusing to work out a clear path to lowering debt, protecting our health and environment, and controlling a financial sector that is clearly out of control and free to skin us all.
tonto_goldberg 1 year, 6 months ago
asb, the definition is up above in this string of posts. Polarization has riven the country. They describe what is happening; polarization is the effect and a riven population is the outcome.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID