Feds say all motorcycle riders should wear helmets

Deaths have increased despite fewer other traffic fatalities

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal safety officials are calling on states to require all motorcycle riders to wear helmets, citing a surge in fatalities since the late 1990s.

Motorcycle deaths have increased over the last decade even as other traffic fatalities have declined, the National Transportation Safety Board said.

There were 4,400 motorcycle deaths in the U.S. last year, more than in all aviation, rail, marine and pipeline accidents combined. That’s nearly twice the fatalities a decade ago. Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes.

Board members said at a news conference they were elevating the helmet recommendation to their annual list of “most wanted” safety improvements to spotlight the issue and pressure governors and state legislatures to act.

“People have to get outraged about this safety issue that is causing so many deaths needlessly,” NTSB Vice Chairman Christopher Hart said.

Twenty states make all motorcycle riders wear helmets, the board said. Most states have limited helmet requirements, and three states — Iowa, Illinois and New Hampshire — have no requirement.

Nearly all states had universal helmet laws when they were necessary for full federal highway funding. But in the mid-1990s Congress repealed the requirement, leaving the issue up to states to decide. As states began repealing or weakening helmet laws, fatalities rose.

The safety board can’t force states to enact tougher helmet laws or offer money as an incentive. Its primary power is its bully pulpit.

Deborah Hersman, the safety board’s chair, promised to keep pressure on states and, if that doesn’t work, to seek help from Congress or the administration.

The call for tougher helmet laws comes after a new report showing the United States lagging behind nearly every other wealthy country in reducing traffic fatalities, despite bringing them down 9.7 percent last year to 33,808, the lowest number since 1950. In 2008, an estimated 37,423 people died on the highways, representing a yearly decline of 9.3 percent.

The dramatic declines were likely due to a sour economy as people drove less, rather than changing their behavior, the report by the Transportation Research Board said. Fatalities are likely to increase as the economy improves, researchers said.

Other countries are doing better. The U.S. had the lowest fatality rate in the world in the 1970s, but Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Finland, Norway, France and the United Kingdom have surpassed the United States.

Comments

misshoneybee 2 years, 6 months ago

Well, DUH! Of course they should. You don't see Brett Favre playing football without a helmet! But there will always be motorcycle riders that are resistant to wearing helmets. However, a hard head makes a soft...you know the rest...

0

JCLifer 2 years, 6 months ago

Agree with the honeybee on this one. First word came to mind was DUH. Oh and I ride a motorcycle.

0

asb 2 years, 5 months ago

Yes it is the federal government's business . . . helmetless riders cost the rest of us a lot more ER money than those wearing them. That's what mandatory car/health/home insurance is all about, keeping the irresponsible from stealing from the rest of us. There's as much justification for helmet law as speeding or driving on the correct side of the road law. An old populist (Wallace), when faced with libertarian comparisons and challenges, said " . . . the reason there're so few real libertarians around isn't just because they're wrong, it's 'cause they're busy dying from being right."

0

asb 2 years, 5 months ago

The fool, their family, friends, co-workers, employers, their taxes, etc. Sorry, if you don't want this to be federal, then state is fine. Insuror's holiday. Airbags, turn signals, brakes, anything else you'd remove to kill those foolish enough to drive?

0

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting