Today's Edition Local Missouri National World Opinion Obits Sports GoMidMo Events Classifieds Newsletters Contests Special Sections Jobs

The big story on Fox News recently was Joe Biden's purported "war on meat" — a breathless disclosure that the president plans to limit every American to 4 pounds of steaks a year. Republican politicians jumped on the issue, defiantly promising to defend your right to consume hamburgers. "Not gonna happen in Texas," Gov. Greg Abbott declared.

There was only one problem: The story was nonsense, a work of imagination concocted by a British newspaper after Biden pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions sharply. Fox later quietly admitted that the story was wrong, but that didn't stop House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy from repeating it. Biden "wants control of your life," the California Republican charged. "He's gonna control how much meat you can eat. Can you imagine that?"

Actually, no.

On one level, the GOP's crusade against fictional meat rationing is just one more sign of Donald Trump's lasting imprint on his party: Why let the truth get in the way of a good attack?

But it also reflects a serious problem for Republican leaders as they try to organize a coherent opposition to Biden's ambitious — and largely popular — economic proposals: Some of the loudest voices in their party remain focused on waging a Trump-style "culture war."

Before the meat scare, they warned that pandemic mask regulations posed a threat to the American way of life. Before that, the menace was embodied by a publisher's decision to take certain Dr. Seuss books off the market. And before that, a dispute over the gender of Mr. Potato Head.

None of those controversies appeared to dent Biden's standing, probably because they just didn't seem as important to most people as the president's priorities: ending the pandemic and reviving the economy.

But the GOP's internal divisions — between pro-Trump militants, an anti-Trump minority and a fence-straddling, can't-we-all-get-along middle faction — have gotten in the way of Republicans' ability to articulate a coherent set of policy goals, and that's left many party members reliant on the Trumpian strategy of ridiculing the opposition.

"We need to create a sense that the party is ready to govern," a Republican strategist told me. "We haven't gotten there yet."

And they won't unless they can patch up their internal disputes. Last week, Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the most prominent anti-Trump Republican in the House, pointedly didn't invite the former president to a House GOP retreat in Florida. In response, Trump, who seems to relish stoking the party's divisions, issued a written statement calling her "a warmongering fool."

The former president also weighed in against Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who had condemned Trump's attempt to overturn the 2020 election. "I think they should change Mitch McConnell," Trump said.

"We're looking to the future, not the past," the senator replied.

For McConnell, Biden's ambitious spending plans have been something of a gift, because they gave his party a clearer target.

"Republicans got into this business because they worry about the size and scope of government, not because they worry about Dr. Seuss," Scott Jennings, a former McConnell aide, told me. "Biden has reminded us that we're the conservative party."

And Jennings previewed the central argument he expects Republicans to make next year: "If economic growth slows down, we'll argue that Biden's policies were responsible. If the economy gets better, we'll argue that it should have gotten a lot better."

That kind of campaign would be a virtual copy of the election of 2010, when Republicans criticized a newly elected President Barack Obama for the disappointing results of his economic stimulus package and attacked his health insurance plan as too ambitious. The result: Republicans won six seats in the Senate and a majority in the House.

Doyle McManus is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times. Readers may send him email at

COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with our commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. Our commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.