Breaking:School dismissals, weather-related announcements for Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2020
Today's Edition Local News Missouri News National News World Opinion Obits Sports GoMidMo Events Classifieds Jobs Newsletters Contests Search
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Dale Reichel

California

Dear Editor:

I believe Medicare for all is the way of tomorrow's health care, or some form of single-payer as stated in my previous LTEs. I can't see paying more money for less coverage. How about you?

Here is some more info for you to think about. In 2019 alone I read private insurers will take in $252 billion more than they pay out, equal to 12 percent of their premiums. Source: "The Nation" magazine.

A single-payer system with overheard costs comparable to Medicare (2 percent) could save about $220 billion of that money. A public "option" would save far less if any, if the new public coverage is channeled overhead is at 13.7 percent, is even higher than the average commercial insurer.

A "public option" would save little or nothing on hospitals' and doctors' sky-high billing and administrative costs. The global budget payment strategy has cut administrative costs at hospitals in Canada and Scotland to half the U.S. level.

Think on that, Mr. and Mrs. Republican.

COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with our commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. Our commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT