Your Opinion: Response to Wenzlick

Charlotte Schnieders

Jefferson City

Dear Editor:

They say you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink. Such is the case for liberals as you can show truths of your statements in books (not conspiracies), but you can't make them read! They deem all facts unreliable as they can't differentiate between facts and opinions they hear from the "anti-Trump media."

The Obama appointed Inspector General Horrowitz' report only investigate the Department of Justice and couldn't issue indictments. It revealed deeply embedded corruption in our government to undo the Trump candidacy and overturn the election. Forty-four FBI violations with 17 egregious violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. That court approves 99.97 percent of applications relying on FBI verification. The FBI used an unverified salacious dossier created by Russians, passed to Steele, (an anti-Trump British spy), paid for by Hillary and DNC which was not disclosed, using documents altered by an FBI lawyer to target for conspiracy Manafort, Carter Page, Papadopoulos, Flynn and back-door into the Trump campaign. Comey and Rosenstein, top FBI, falsely verified dossier four times knowing it contained falsehoods, which started the costly, two-year Mueller investigation. So, what documents did Mueller destroy to save his FBI friends and why wasn't this revealed in his report? Horrowitz also found 51 other violations, nine false statements and 33 statements not verified. Durham and Barr in an unprecedented response disagreed as to the seriousness of Horrowitz' report. Durham's scope is significantly larger, he can indict and his report will surface next year. Had Hillary won, we wouldn't know how long our government has been this corrupt!

Your supposed "fact witnesses," Ms. Wenzlick, admitted they didn't know what crime Trump committed. Sondland testified Trump said, "I want nothing from Ukraine, no quid pro quo"! Three anti-Trump, constitutional lawyers who don't allow conservative free speech, assembly or press on their campuses, were chastised by constitutional lawyer Jonathan Turley, a Democrat, who said this was the fastest impeachment in U.S. history, using a paucity of uncompelling evidence, but an abundance of anger that lowered impeachment standards forever. Turley said this is wrong and not how you impeach an American president. Democrats changed the definition of a crime, ran focus group polls to determine what charges might win voters in the 2020 election. I will debunk your other false claims in another LTE!

Upcoming Events