Today's Edition Local News Missouri News National News World Opinion Obits Sports GoMidMo Events Classifieds Jobs Newsletters Contests Search
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Dale Reichel

California

Dear Editor:

May I respond one more time please? After reading Mr. Otto's April 4 letter in the Tribune on nuclear energy again, his comments sort of back what I said in my letter.

Related Article

Your Opinion: Nuclear safer after learning from mistakes

Read more

Ignoring safety protocols, poorly designed facilities, violations of NRC rules, backup walls too low, etc. Why risk it? All these things could keep happening again or worse!

Who wants to risk cancer?

People lie, governments lie. Just look at our present government. Why risk it? A nuclear disaster could effect millions of people! There are alternatives, we all know, and less costly. Why risk it? Who is going to pay?

"After 50 years of nuclear power the record is pretty good." Well, pretty good isn't good enough. You need perfect when it comes to nuclear. That probably isn't going to happen.

Let's use God's wind and sun.

COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with our commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. Our commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT