Missouri House sends drug monitoring bill to Parson

<p>Rep. Justin Hill, R-Lake St. Louis, speaks against the passage of SB 63 as Sen. Holly Rehder, a Sikeston Republican who has sponsored the prescription drug monitoring program bill for the last nine years, watched from the side gallery.</p>

Rep. Justin Hill, R-Lake St. Louis, speaks against the passage of SB 63 as Sen. Holly Rehder, a Sikeston Republican who has sponsored the prescription drug monitoring program bill for the last nine years, watched from the side gallery.

In a historic vote, the Missouri House signed off Tuesday on legislation creating a prescription drug monitoring program - inching one step closer to ending Missouri's designation as the only state without one.

The bill now heads to Gov. Mike Parson for his signature or veto.

Sen. Holly Rehder, a Sikeston Republican who has sponsored the PDMP bill for the last nine years, watched the vote from the side gallery.

"I'm just so thankful," she said, wiping tears away. "I'm just very thankful."

The bill would establish a "Joint Oversight Task Force for Prescription Drug Monitoring," which would be made up of licensed health care professionals such as physicians and pharmacists, who would oversee the creation of a centralized database. The bill is based on the compromise lawmakers reached on last year's legislation.

Supporters argue it's necessary to monitor patient history and help providers intervene to stop opioid abuse.

In the past, even with the support of Parson, opponents blocked the legislation. It appeared to be on the brink of passage last year but was shot down after Democrats who have traditionally supported the program joined Republican lawmakers in opposition.

The fight for PDMP was a personal one for Rehder, who has been open about the fact her mother and sister struggled with drug addiction, as well as her children.

"This isn't a political bill. It's a bill for families and those struggling with addiction," she said. "I understand it from the child's perspective but also the parent not knowing what to do."

During Tuesday's debate, the bill faced familiar criticism from conservative Republicans who argued it was an unnecessary and unworkable government overstep that would result in privacy rights being violated.

Rep. Justin Hill, R-Lake St. Louis, said Missouri has been the sole state without a PDMP but hasn't seen a disproportionate increase in opioid addiction.

"We're number one in freedom," Hill said. "But we're not number one in overdoses."

Rehder has pointed to provisions in this year's bill that require data would be purged on a rolling basis and could only be kept for three years. That protection doesn't exist in a St. Louis County PDMP program that currently covers more than 80 percent of Missouri's population.

The database also cannot be used by law enforcement to prevent an individual from owning a firearm, or as probable cause to obtain a search warrant or arrest. If a person knowingly discloses patient information in violation of the bill, he or she could be guilty of a class E felony.

Those provisions did little to comfort critics.

"I was told we won in the fall," Hill said. "I'm not sure we won. We are not the party of big government."

Rehder said Parson has been helpful in shepherding the bill across the finish line, and she has no reason to believe he won't sign her bill.

The Missouri Independent is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization covering state government and its impact on Missourians.

Upcoming Events