Breaking News

2 people shot in JC December 22, 2014

0

Swampyville's - Ask the Politically Correct (Constitutional Republic)

Swampyville's - Abolishing "Three Little Words" in the U.S. Constitution!

Swampyville's - Reading Between the Lines!

Abolishing "Three Little Words (SPEECH, OR, OF)" to Amendment One of the U.S. Constitution!

THE PROGRESSIVES* HAVE DETERMINED THE THREE LITTLE WORDS (SPEECH, OR, OF) IN AMENDMENT ONE OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION HAS TO BE DELETED! HOWEVER, "ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS" (TO CONTINUE BRAINWASHING THE PEOPLE) MUST REMAIN!

The word *"Progressive" is no longer in vogue. The new politically correct word is "Modern". Now, the progressives are referring to themselves as "Modernists". It sounds more socialist central than the word progressive in hopes of convincing the people that they are more modern than the people are. (They are merely changing their spots to confuse the people)

American modernism like modernism in general is a trend of thought that affirms the power of human beings to create, improve, and reshape their environment, with the aid of scientific knowledge, technology and practical experimentation, and is thus in its essence both (progressive) and optimistic. The idea that individual human beings can define themselves through their own inner resources and create their own vision of existence without help from (family, fellow citizens, or tradition) is a large trend. The general term covers many political, cultural and artistic movements rooted in the changes in Western society at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century (Fabianism - my opinion). American modernism is an artistic and cultural movement in the United States starting at the turn of the 20th century with its core period between World War I and World War II and continuing into the 21st century. (Wikipedia)

In my opinion, those in Government who claimed to be Progressives/ Modernists are nothing more then hypocritical opportunists (both parties)!

If Amendment One was changed it would probably be as follows:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or, abridging the freedom of the press; of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

In the modernists opinion, Amendments One and Two of the U.S. Constituion, if not the entire Constitution, should be deleted as being archaic! (The modernists need not worry, in my opinion, the U.S. Constitution will eventually be replaced by a revised United Nations/Special Interests Constitution)

FREEDOM OF SPEECH!

"Freedom of speech is the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas via speech. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, (regardless of the medium used). In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity and incitement to commit a crime". (Wikipedia) (This includes the Internet)

Of course, when the U.S. Constitution was written there wasn't an Internet. The powers that are can't change the Constitution but they can change the "Freedom of Speech" of the Internet by going through the "Back Door". And that is exactly what they are doing. They control the media, now they want complete control of the Internet. Unfortunately, all of the current Internet companies are going along to get along with the Government/Special Interests!

While the Government Prestidigitators overtly state that they are against the United Nations controlling the Inter- national Internet, it is my opinion, that they covertly are enthusiastic about this eventuality! They, the Government, have made many attempts to circumvent the U.S. Constitution, so that they can control what is put on this nation's Internet!

In December 2012, the International Information and Telecommunications Union (ITU) will be holding a major treaty rewriting conference in Dubai that many countries (including the United States) would like to use to significantly expand their jurisdiction and legal authority, giving them greater influence over internet governance as well as major telecommunications issues.

In that the "CONNECTION" (U.S. Government/Special Interests) can't change the U.S. Constitution by passing laws that would remove the "Freedom of Speech" clause, they, in my opinion, are coming through the "Back Door" via the United Nations Financial Interest groups!

A controlled Media can refuse to print what an individual has written (Opposing View); but, it can never control what's printed within an individual's mind!

COME ON PEOPLE! THE UNITED NATIONS WASN'T CREATED FOR "WE THE PEOPLE"! IT WAS CREATED OF, BY, AND FOR CERTAIN SPECIAL (FINANCIAL) INTERESTS!

"CAUSA LATET, VIS EST NOTISSIMA" (The cause is hidden, but the results are well known)

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting