0

Swampyville's - Ask the Politically Correct (Constitutional Republic)

Swa,mpyville's - The (Unradicalized) Supreme Court's decision on "ObamaCare"!

Swampyville - Reading Between the Lines!

The (unradicalized?) Supreme Courts decision on "ObamaCare"!

RADICALIZE (In this case): "To make rapid and sweeping changes in laws and methods of Government"!

Yahoo! News (April 2, 2012)

"President Obama on Monday issued stern (threatening) language to the Supreme Court regarding his health care, expressing confidence "ObamaCare" will not be overturned. He said, that overturning the (Government/Special Interests) law would be "an unprecedented and extraordinary step" and compared the court's rejection (all or parts) of the law to be "Judicial Activism". For years what we have heard is the biggest problem on the bench was "Judicial Activism", he said. The president stressed that the judges are "unelected" and noted the law was passed by a democratically elected (stacked deck) Congress"!

(Reflecting back on "Judicial Activism" in the past, it was mainly Democratic Presidents/Administrations that attemped to radicalize previous Supreme Courts. Even the Republicans, at times, have been guilty of trying to "Stack" the Supreme Court "deck of cards".)

(It's "Judicial Activism" only when the powers that are (Government/Special Interests) can't get the Supreme Court to "go along to get along". When the court doesn't play by their (both parties) rules of the game, they will take their equipment "Supreme Court budget appropriations (Government) and political campaign contributions (Special Interests)", and go home.)

(The politicians knew when "ObamaCare" was passed that it wouldn't stand on it's own merit. They knew that it would be challenged by the people and they too counted on "Judicial Activism" to declare it, "Obamacare", to be Constitutional. (Thus, further weakening the U.S. Constitution.)

(In my opinion, the Supreme Court "may" rule the "Individual heath care mandate" as being unconstitutional and let the remainder of the law stand. If the Supreme Court decides in favor of the entire "ObamaCare" law, that will mean the end of the U.S. Constitution, as we know it.)

(What the President and many in Congress fail (or don't want to understand) is that the primary reason for the Supreme Court is to uphold the U.S. Constitution; and not to radicalize its meaning whenever it will benefit the Government/Special Interests!)

(The above have all swarn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and not to "whimsically" change it whenever they feel it will fulfill their Agenda.)

EVIDENTLY, THE "CHECKS AND BALANCES" THAT THE FRAMERS PLACED IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION NO LONGER HAS ANY "REDEEMING VALUE" IN THEIR NEW "PROGRESSIVE" ONE WORLD ORDER!

COME ON PEOPLE, WHEN ARE YOU EVER GOING TO CONCLUDE AND WAKE UP TO THE FACT THAT THIS COUNTRY HAS NEVER BEEN CONTROLLED BY THE PEOPLE! IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN CONTROLLED BY THE "SPECIAL INTERESTS"! WE THE PEOPLE CONTINUE TO BE PAWNS IN THE "SPECIAL INTERESTS" GAME OF "INTERNATIONAL CHESS"!

"PRAESIS UT PROSIS NE UT IMPERES" (Lead in order to serve, not in order to rule)

In response to:

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting