I have a somewhat different opinion about this mess of broadcast stations expecting compensation for inclusion of their signals in cable, dish, or whatever media. Their signals are distributed free of charge to anyone who are able to get them with an antenna. I don't understand why they expect service providers to pay them for something that is otherwise free. Mediacom, Dish, and Direct TV are doing the local stations (and their advertisers) a service by including their signals in their media packages. By doing so, the stations' signals are being made available to more people in more locations than otherwise would be the case. In addition, for many viewers, they are of higher quality. Many people in Columbia cannot receive KRCG over the air and many people in JC cannot get a good KOMU signal.
Is there any additional expense to local broadcast stations to simply allow their signals to be rebroadcast over cable?
Last login: Friday, August 10, 2012
Copyright © 2014, CMNI.
All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Central Missouri Newspapers Inc.
Material from the Associated Press is Copyright © 2010, Associated
Press and may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall
not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or
redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP
materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for
personal and noncommercial use. The AP will not be held liable for any
delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the
transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages
arising from any of the foregoing. All rights reserved.
© 2014 News Tribune Publishing.