The issue isn't why were there no cameras in the courtroom, I think people can understand why not; the issue is why did the News Tribune send a cartoonist to be the courtroom artist instead of someone with some actual talent for sketching. I bet if the judge knew beforehand that the courtroom sketches would look like a bad version of the Peanuts sunday comic, she might have decided that one differently.
Seriously. The judge bans cameras, allowing one courtroom artist to be the eyes of the public, and the News Tribune sends a cartoonist?! I know Jefferson City is not exactly a sophisticated metropolis and the News Tribune is probably more used to covering bake sales and rotary club meetings than real news but come on people, this is the biggest story of your careers, couldn't you at least spring for a sketch artist that knows how to sketch?
Last login: Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Copyright © 2014, CMNI.
All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Central Missouri Newspapers Inc.
Material from the Associated Press is Copyright © 2010, Associated
Press and may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall
not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or
redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP
materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for
personal and noncommercial use. The AP will not be held liable for any
delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the
transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages
arising from any of the foregoing. All rights reserved.
© 2014 News Tribune Publishing.