Our Opinion: Senate should follow House in banning gifts

News Tribune Editorial

We encourage the Missouri Senate to follow the House members in banning local lobbyists from giving gifts to elected officials.

On Monday, the House voted 149-5 to approve the legislation, sending it to the Senate. The bill also would ban gifts to superintendents.

The Associated Press reported the House approved a bill in January to ban lobbyist gifts to themselves, other lawmakers and statewide elected officials. But that bill is stalled in the Senate.

The Senate in recent years has resisted efforts to ban such gifts. This year, however, such legislation has new-found hope, as it has the backing of House Speaker Todd Richardson and Gov. Eric Greitens.

One of Greitens' campaign platforms was ethics reform, and the issue clearly resonates with the public.

"A free meal won't buy my vote" is a common mantra we've heard from lawmakers who oppose gift bans. Perhaps, but like we've argued here before, it's harder to vote against the efforts of someone who is repeatedly "scratching your back" with not only meals, but fruit baskets, top-tier sports tickets and even vacations at golf resorts.

Under the proposed local ban, gifts and catered meals still would be allowed at events if all lawmakers are invited, the AP reported.

The reason lobbyists buy MU tickets and nice meals for lawmakers is what likely pays off in the long run. Like any good businessmen, they're not going to invest $100 in something that gives them a return of $80.

State lawmakers receive a $103 per diem each day they work. That's enough for their living cost, including food, while in Jefferson City.

Even if lawmakers aren't swayed by all the swag at the Capitol, they have to realize the perception with the public.

The perception doesn't look good. It doesn't pass the smell test. And in people's minds, perception is reality.

Upcoming Events