Maintain focus.
As possibilities and permutations enter the equation, we encourage Jefferson City Parks and Recreation commissioners to remember city residents requested a multipurpose building for indoor recreation.
That doesn't mean partnerships or added uses of a facility must be rejected; it means the intent of city taxpayers must remain paramount.
Commissioners had identified a possible site at Ellis Porter/Riverside Park, but found the $5 million set aside for the project was short of the estimated $8.5 million price tag.
The multipurpose facility generally is a popular idea and has attracted alternatives.
Among those being pursued is an option combining: a partnership with the Special Olympics, a not-for-profit group; possible use of the lodging tax funds collected by the Jefferson City Convention and Visitors Bureau to attract tourism; and the purchase of property on Missouri 179 owned by the Jefferson City School District at a discounted price. As envisioned, the cost of the facility would exceed $26 million.
A separate proposal is a collaboration with Lincoln University, which intends to build a recreational facility on its campus. The City Council has endorsed exploration of this partnership.
As with any partnership, details must be hammered out. Will indoor facilities be separate (like a duplex), common or shared when requested? How will oversight and use be determined between or among partners; is a combined sports authority workable and desirable? Will the facility be marketed to attract outside sports events or tournaments; how will that affect use by residents, students, etc.?
Increasing tourism and strengthening ties among community partners are laudable goals, but they are not specific goals of parks and recreation commissioners.
Taxpayers want an indoor venue for basketball, volleyball and other recreational activities.
Commissioners will not make a poor decision if they retain that focus.