Nixon ‘gun rights’ veto sustained
House votes to override, but Senate comes up one vote short
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Missouri senators blocked a likely legal battle over a bill supporters said protects Missourians’ constitutional right to bear arms.
With the help of two Republicans — Senate President Pro Tem Tom Dempsey, R-St. Charles, and Floor Leader Ron Richard, R-Joplin — and all 10 Democrats, the Senate fell one vote short of overriding Gov. Jay Nixon’s veto of the bill that lawmakers call the “Second Amendment Preservation Act.”
The Senate vote was 22-10. Mid-Missouri Republicans Mike Kehoe, Jefferson City, and Kurt Schaefer, Columbia, both voted to override.
The House gathered the bare minimum two-thirds vote needed, overriding Nixon’s veto by a 109-49 margin, with three abstentions.
Opponents argued that it’s really a nullification bill, because, as Rep. Mike Colona, D-St. Louis, told House colleagues: “It says federal laws are not to be followed in Missouri.”
The Senate picked up the bill two hours later and debated the issue for an hour before sustaining the veto.
Nixon’s four-page veto letter said the law violates the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which says laws and treaties passed under the Constitution must be followed if they differ from state laws.
Supporters of the bill said that’s not an issue, because the new law only rejects federal laws that are unconstitutional, that infringe on a Missouri citizen’s rights under the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment.
“This bill is saying we want to stand up and protect the rights and liberties under our Missouri and U.S. constitutions,” House sponsor Doug Funderburk, R-St. Charles, said as he urged the House to override the veto.
Nixon and Attorney General Chris Koster both argued the bill would prohibit federal agents from doing their jobs.
And, Koster said in a Sept. 3 letter to lawmakers, passing the law would prevent state and local law officers from working with federal officials on joint task forces or investigations.
The Missouri Sheriff’s Association and other law enforcement groups agreed, urging lawmakers to sustain Nixon’s veto.
But the bill’s Senate sponsor, Brian Nieves, R-Washington, called Koster’s letter “a joke” and “a bunch of baloney.”
And, he added, Koster “has lied and lied and lied” about the impact of the bill.
Nieves said to Koster, even though the attorney general wasn’t in the chamber: “The people of Missouri will remember what you did when you ask them to be their next governor.”
Koster, a former Republican who switched parties about six years ago, is considered by many to be the front-runner to succeed Nixon in the 2016 elections.
Sen. Jason Holsman, D-Kansas City, objected to Nieves’ complaints about the attorney general, saying Koster’s letter showed lawmakers a number of problems “with a poorly written bill.”
House and Senate Democrats both noted the bill would make it a misdemeanor crime for newspapers and anyone else to publish the names, addresses or other identifying information of any gun owner.
They said that would prevent the publication of pictures and stories about successful hunters.
Rep. Jill Schlupp, D-Creve Coeur, argued before the House vote: “A pedophile with a gun will be protected from having his name published.
“A drug dealer will be invisible from the public, if he owns a gun.”
The Missouri Press Association voted last week to file a lawsuit challenging the law, if both houses had overridden the governor.
Related articles about Wednesday's veto session:
Additional online resources:
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting