Nixon renews case on veto of proposed Mo. tax
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
By CHRIS BLANK
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon pressed his objections Tuesday to what he called a “risky, untested scheme” that would reduce the state’s income tax rate for the first time in more than 90 years.
Nixon vetoed the tax cut legislation last week, and on Tuesday, he urged higher education leaders to tell their state lawmakers how the tax cut could hurt their schools. He said that when fully implemented, the tax cut would cost state government $800 million, which would be the equivalent of eliminating all state support for higher education institutions.
The Democratic governor said lawmakers can either support the tax cut or higher education, but not both. He said he strongly opposes the tax measure and “will use the energy of my office to continue to talk about it.”
The income tax cut was among the Republican-led Legislature’s top priorities and was designed as a response to a similar but more sweeping tax proposal last year in neighboring Kansas. Supporters of Missouri’s tax cut called it a “responsible way to make Missouri more competitive” and have said Nixon’s veto signals the Show-Me State isn’t interested in retaining its businesses.
Two of Missouri’s leading business groups — Associated Industries of Missouri and the Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry — also have criticized Nixon’s veto.
Missouri lawmakers return in September to the state Capitol to decide whether to attempt to override any of Nixon’s vetoes. To override the veto of the tax legislation, every Republican House member would need to support the effort unless some of Nixon’s fellow Democrats can be persuaded.
The governor has outlined philosophical, financial and technical objections to the proposed tax cut. Among the reasons he has cited for the veto, Nixon contends the legislation would eliminate existing sales tax emptions on prescription drugs and college textbooks.
“The magnitude of the choice here is significant, very significant,” Nixon said. He added: “Throwing a huge tax cut that’s sloppily worded with huge amounts of unintended consequences like raising taxes on seniors on prescription drugs and students on buying their books is not the way to move our economy forward.”
Under the tax cut proposals, there would be a phased-in 50 percent deduction over five years for small business income that is reported on individual income tax returns. The state’s corporate income tax rate also would be trimmed nearly in half while the top tax rate for individuals would be reduced from 6 percent to 5.5 percent over the next decade.
The tax rate reductions for corporate and individual taxes would be effective only if state revenues grow by at least $100 million annually over their high point from the previous three years.
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting