Prosecutor: Winston investigation ‘thorough’
Monday, December 2, 2013
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — The prosecutor investigating sexual assault allegations against Florida State quarterback Jameis Winston wants the process to be “thorough” and won’t let football dictate when he will wrap up his inquiry.
State Attorney Willie Meggs on Monday reiterated he won’t let FSU’s football schedule or Winston’s Heisman Trophy possibilities determine when his investigation will be completed.
Winston has led the Seminoles to the No. 1 ranking and they will play for a conference title Saturday, with a shot at the national crown. The quarterback is also the leading candidate for the Heisman and many voters are waiting to see if Winston will be charged with a crime before casting their ballots. The deadline for Heisman ballots to be turned in is Mondaty.
Timothy Jansen, Winston’s attorney, said Monday he is communicating daily with his client, who “wants it to be over.” Jansen last week publicly complained about the pace of the investigation.
“Obviously he’s focusing on football and academics and he knows it’s a process and we’re waiting for Mr. Meggs to conclude his investigation,” Jansen said.
While the allegations were initially reported to Tallahassee police nearly a year ago, the case wasn’t turned over to prosecutors until November. The Tallahassee Police Department has defended its handling of the case even though the family of the victim has said police detectives warned them about pressing charges.
Meggs initially estimated it would only take a few weeks for prosecutors to determine whether to charge Winston. ESPN reported last month DNA that matched Winston was found in the underwear of the accuser. While Jansen has suggested the sex was consensual, the family of the accuser issued a statement alleging Winston raped the woman.
Meggs declined to say exactly when his investigation will end.
“We’re not basing what we are doing on a football schedule or anyone else’s calendar,” Meggs said. “We’re moving as rapidly as we can.”
Meggs has repeatedly said his office must not only present enough evidence to charge someone but determine whether there is a reasonable chance for conviction before proceeding.
More like this story
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting