Permit for baptisms spurs debate

ST. LOUIS (AP) — A budding rift over the use of protected rivers and streams in south-central Missouri for baptisms is over before it really got started.

U.S. Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., raised concerns in a letter this week to Ozark National Scenic Riverways superintendent William Black about permits required for baptisms. The riverways is under the direction of the National Park Service, providing oversight for sections of the Jacks Fork and Current rivers, along with creeks and streams near those rivers.

“Why does the use of the river for a baptism, a simple service that may only take a matter of minutes, require a special use permit?” Smith asked in the letter. “One would hope that the answer is not, ‘Because the National Park Service wants to limit the number of baptisms performed on the river.’”

Black responded on Thursday saying the permit issue was a misunderstanding, and that he was clarifying policy to ensure that no permit is required.

For decades, churches in the area around Salem have frequently performed baptisms in the Current River, Sinking Creek and other waterways in the sparsely populated but scenic area.

Dennis Purcell, 61, has been a member of Gladden Baptist Church in rural Salem since he was a child. Baptism is a sacred ritual in the church, he said, but one that often isn’t planned.

That’s where the permit issue became problematic. The riverways office since 2006 had a policy requiring permits for special uses, with a 48-hour notice policy.

Black said three churches had requested, and been granted, standing permits, with the permit fee waived. Controversy was avoided until the Park Service closed vehicle access to the sandbar along Sinking Creek where Gladden Baptist held its baptisms. Church leaders wanted to take vans to the site so the elderly and mobility-impaired could participate in events.

The riverways office then cited the need for a special-use permit to gain that access, a permit that technically requires 48 hours’ notice.

In his letter to Smith, Black said there was never intent to restrict baptisms or to require notice before they take place.

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting

News Tribune - comments