In interview, Ahmadinejad pushes new world order
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks during an exclusive interview with Associated Press editorial staff during his visit to the 67th session of the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2012 in New York. Photo by The Associated Press.
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
NEW YORK (AP) — After an hour of fielding questions about Syria, sanctions and nuclear weapons, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had enough. Now, he said, it was his turn to choose the topic — his "new order" which will inevitably replace the current era of what he called U.S. bullying.
Continuing his hectic pace of media appearances and diplomatic meetings, Ahmadinejad presented an air of boredom when it came to the hot topic on everyone's mind — Iran's nuclear program and the possibility of impending war. Whether it was feigned or sincere, he said he would much rather be talking about his vision of what the next world order might be.
Conveniently, it would be an order in which the U.S. and the traditional powers play a smaller role and every country has equal standing (though the state of Israel, he often predicts, will soon become a historical footnote).
"God willing, a new order will come and will do away with ... everything that distances us," Ahmadinejad told The Associated Press in an exclusive interview Tuesday, speaking through a translator. "All of the animosity, all of the lack of sincerity will come to an end. It will institute fairness and justice."
He said the world was losing patience with the current state of affairs.
"Now even elementary school kids throughout the world have understood that the United States government is following an international policy of bullying," he said. "I do believe the system of empires has reached the end of the road. The world can no longer see an emperor commanding it."
The interview was held on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly — Ahmadinejad's last as president of Iran. He was to address the assembly Wednesday morning.
He also discussed solutions for the Syrian civil war, dismissed the question of Iran's nuclear ambition and claimed that despite Western sanctions his country is better off than it was when he took office in 2005.
Earlier Tuesday, President Barack Obama warned Iran that time is running out to resolve the dispute over its nuclear program. In a speech to the General Assembly, Obama said the United States could not tolerate an Iran with atomic weapons.
Ahmadinejad would not respond directly to the president's remarks, saying he did not want to influence the U.S. presidential election in November.
But he argued that the international outcry over Iran's nuclear enrichment program was just an excuse by the West to dominate his country. He claimed that the United States has never accepted Iran's choice of government after the 1979 Islamic revolution.
"Everyone is aware the nuclear issue is the imposition of the will of the United States," he said. "I see the nuclear issue as a non-issue. It has become a form of one-upmanship."
Ahmadinejad said he favored more dialogue, even though negotiations with world powers remain stalled after three rounds of high-level meetings since April.
He said some world leaders have suggested to him that Iran would be better off holding nuclear talks only with the United States.
"Of course I am not dismissing such talks," he said, asked if he were open to discussions with the winner of the American presidential election.
Israeli leaders, however, are still openly contemplating military action again Iranian nuclear facilities, dismissing diplomacy as a dead end. Israel and many in the West suspect that Iran is seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, and cite its failure to cooperate fully with nuclear inspectors. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.
Ahmadinejad also proposed forming a new group of 10 or 11 countries to work to end the 18-month Syrian civil war. Representatives of nations in the Middle East and elsewhere would meet in New York "very soon," he said.
Critics have accused Tehran of giving support to Syrian President Bashar Assad in carrying out massacres and other human rights violations in an attempt to crush the uprising against his rule. Activists say nearly 30,000 people have died.
Ahmadinejad said the so-called contact group hopes to get the Syrian government and opposition to sit across from each other.
"I will do everything in my power to create stability, peace and understanding in Syria," Ahmadinejad said.
Earlier this month, Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi announced the formation of a four-member contact group with Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia. But Saudi Arabia so far has not participated.
Ahmadinejad denied Iranian involvement in plotting attacks on Israelis abroad, despite arrests and accusations by police in various countries. He also vehemently disputed the U.S. claim that Iranian agents played a role in a foiled plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States last year.
Ahmadinejad will leave office next June after serving two four-year terms. He threw out numbers and statistics during the interview to show that Iran's economy and the lives of average Iranians have improved under his watch. Since his 2005 election, he claimed, Iran went from being the world's 22nd-largest economy to the 17th-largest; non-petroleum related exports increased sevenfold; and the basic production of goods has doubled. Median income increased by $4,000, he said.
It was not possible to immediately verify his figures.
"Today's conditions in Iran are completely different to where they were seven years ago in the economy, in technical achievement, in scientific know-how," Ahmadinejad said. "All of these achievements, though, have been reached under conditions in which we were brought under heavy sanctions."
Iran has called for the U.S. and its European allies to ease the sanctions that have hit its critical oil exports and left it blackballed from key international banking networks.
Ahmadinejad said he had no knowledge of the whereabouts of Robert Levinson, a private investigator and former FBI agent who vanished in Iran five years ago. He said he directed Iranian intelligence services two years ago to work with their counterparts in the U.S. to locate him.
"And if any help there is that I can bring to bear, I would be happy to do so," he said.
He also claimed never to have heard of Amir Hekmati, a former U.S. Marine who is imprisoned on espionage charges in Iran. Hekmati was arrested while visiting his grandmothers in Iran in August 2011, and his family has been using Ahmadinejad's visit to New York to plead for his release.
In spite of Ahmadinejad's assertions on the importance of dialogue and respect for others, he has presented a hard line in many areas in this week's media appearances.
He refuses to speak of the state of Israel by name and instead refers only to the "Zionists." And when asked on Monday about author Salman Rushdie, he made no attempt to distance himself from recent renewed threats on the author's life emanating from an Iranian semi-official religious foundation.
"If he is in the U.S.," said the president of Iran, "you should not broadcast it for his own safety."
Associated Press writers Edith M. Lederer and Wendy Benjaminson contributed to this report.


Comments
eileen10 7 months, 4 weeks ago
This guy is scarey. He reminds me of Hitler only worse because of the nuclear weapons. I wonder if he has things hidden. I don't know if we can "see" things with our spy stuff but if he had his way he'd blow us off the face of the earth.
eileen10 7 months, 4 weeks ago
Paroquet or Rob..HELP! How far can this guy go? Do we need to be worried?
RobHunterJohnson 7 months, 4 weeks ago
Romeny, and President Obama are on the same page on the Red Line. Why would anyone put a point that would let them know how far they can go? Irans President has been full of rhetoric for along time, The Holocaust did not happen? Israel does not have the right to exist? The US will be in place the moment something happens, my opinion, and the real question is Israels red line? Does ahmejab (I don;t care how its spelled) have the bomb, no,does he have the means to deliver something , yes, will he use it? Who is suppling the Taliban, Palestinians, ect. Iran sure shows up alot, and I sure do not want to see the wrath of the US if something happens. The Iranian people clearly do not want this, it should be their responcibility to stop him before he can act. Rob
tonto_goldberg 7 months, 4 weeks ago
The United States is still a great country with enormous resources even if we don't talk about some of them. Alternatively, we could wink at Israel and turn our backs while Iran is cleansed of that scurrilous regime. Then we could wink at Israel as we scold them severely for violating Iran's precious sovereignty.
RobHunterJohnson 7 months, 4 weeks ago
I just wonder sometimes, Romeny and Obama are on the same page on the Red Line, and that is from Romeny? He gets the briefing every morning that OBAMA GETS, he knows what at stake, he knows when enough will be enough, so this continued talk of winking, and scolding is a joke! We should have bombed them in 1979 when they took our embassy hostage, and this problem would not be here now, abdijon was one of the abducters, their armaments and explosive continues to find its way to our battle fields. I don't care if you like President Obama, or not. If Iran crosses that line they are going to be short a few Nuclear Facilities. Rob
asb 7 months, 4 weeks ago
Eileen the guy has run his course, his country is actually suffering greatly from sanctions imposed by much of the world due to Iran's proven goal of developing nuclear weapons. While every nation that can competently do so should have that right to self defense, his constant call for the destruction and elimination of Israel makes a nuclear Iran dangerous and worth preventing. His New World Order talk is hindsight since traditional powers, including the US are indeed less dominant in world affairs due to the development of other nations' economies and their increasing roles in world affairs. Asia, South America, and the Middle East (mostly through use of our trillions spent on wars and to buy SUV food) all have more influence. This isn't due to failings of the west, just catchup after WWII and an increase in paraity among nations after decades of relative peace and lots of trade. Iran knows, and the rest of the world knows, that use of Iranian nukes against Israel would provoke a horrible response against them by the US. This was and is the basis of nuclear deterrant. What we DO need to fear is the use if Iranian nukes against Arab nations. Even that is not likely due to the likely nuclear response by the US, it's just not as guaranteed. The FRight Wing tells you that Obama is soft on these topics and that the world sees him as weak, but stated policy and our record since his election say otherwise. Nobody doubts our willingness to remove or respond to actual threats to our allies. We've helped bring democracy to the middle east and it's been really messy, but never doubt the fact that as the only super power left on earth, the US will do right by our allies. We're not bullies, and his people know that. He's done, and Iran is nearly alone in its determination to make the world an Islamic world. As long as Iran continues to promote and enable extremist Islam, they will be isolated since they're the only nation clearly doing so.
eileen10 7 months, 4 weeks ago
Whew. Thank you everyone. I tried to find the answers myself but didn't really find anything except about nuclear bombs which is really scarey. I'm relieved to know everything all of you told me. Your time and effort to explain things means so very much to me.Again, thank you.
John 7 months, 4 weeks ago
Thankfully, nobody in positions of leadership in this country believe that Ahmadinejad's popularity (in his own country), power, ability to wreck havoc, or strength within his party has "run his course" or that his country will cave due to sanctions.
Iran is one of the most explosive and dangerous countries in the Middle East. Nuclear power in stable hards is a dangerous thing to say nothing of nuclear power (even if only a dirty bomb) in the hands of this id10t and other militant leaders in Iran.
Iran has demonstrated they do not respond to threats and understand only power applied forcefully.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID