Battle over coastal Christmas displays goes to LA court

A man walks past two of the traditional Nativity scenes along Ocean Avenue at Palisades Park in Santa Monica, Calif. Avowed atheist Damon Vix, inset left, last year won two-thirds of the booths in the annual, city-sponsored lottery to divvy up spaces in the live-sized Nativity display.

A man walks past two of the traditional Nativity scenes along Ocean Avenue at Palisades Park in Santa Monica, Calif. Avowed atheist Damon Vix, inset left, last year won two-thirds of the booths in the annual, city-sponsored lottery to divvy up spaces in the live-sized Nativity display.

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Damon Vix didn’t have to go to court to push Christmas out of the city of Santa Monica. He just joined the festivities.

The atheist’s anti-God message alongside a life-sized nativity display in a park overlooking the beach ignited a debate that burned brighter than any Christmas candle.

Santa Monica officials snuffed the city’s holiday tradition this year rather than referee the religious rumble, prompting churches that have set up a 14-scene Christian diorama for decades to sue over freedom of speech violations. Their attorney will ask a federal judge today to resurrect the depiction of Jesus’ birth, while the city aims to eject the case.

“It’s a sad, sad commentary on the attitudes of the day that a nearly 60-year-old Christmas tradition is now having to hunt for a home, something like our savior had to hunt for a place to be born because the world was not interested,” said Hunter Jameson, head of the nonprofit Santa Monica Nativity Scene Committee that is suing.

Missing from the courtroom drama will be Vix and his fellow atheists, who are not parties to the case. Their role outside court highlights a tactical shift as atheists evolve into a vocal minority eager to get their non-beliefs into the public square as never before.

National atheist groups earlier this year took out full-page newspaper ads and hundreds of TV spots in response to the Catholic bishops’ activism around women’s health care issues and are gearing up to battle for their own space alongside public Christmas displays in small towns across America this season.

“In recent years, the tactic of many in the atheist community has been, if you can’t beat them, join them,” said Charles Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center and director of the Newseum’s Religious Freedom Education Project in Washington. “If these church groups insist that these public spaces are going to be dominated by a Christian message, we’ll just get in the game — and that changes everything.”

In the past, atheists primarily fought to uphold the separation of church and state through the courts. The change underscores the conviction held by many nonbelievers that their views are gaining a foothold, especially among young adults.

The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life released a study last month that found 20 percent of Americans say they have no religious affiliation, an increase from 15 percent in the last five years. Atheists took heart from the report, although Pew researchers stressed that the category also encompassed majorities of people who said they believed in God but had no ties with organized religion and people who consider themselves “spiritual” but not “religious.”

“We’re at the bottom of the totem pole socially, but we have muscle and we’re flexing it,” said Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation. “Ignore our numbers at your peril.”

The trouble in Santa Monica began three years ago, when Vix applied for and was granted a booth in Palisades Park alongside the story of Jesus Christ’s birth, from Mary’s visit from the Angel Gabriel to the traditional crhche.

Vix hung a simple sign that quoted Thomas Jefferson: “Religions are all alike -- founded on fables and mythologies.” The other side read “Happy Solstice.” He repeated the display the following year but then upped the stakes significantly.

In 2011, Vix recruited 10 others to inundate the city with applications for tongue-in-cheek displays such as an homage to the “Pastafarian religion,” which would include an artistic representation of the great Flying Spaghetti Monster.

The secular coalition won 18 of 21 spaces. The two others went to the traditional Christmas displays and one to a Hanukkah display.

The atheists used half their spaces, displaying signs such as one that showed pictures of Poseidon, Jesus, Santa Claus and the devil and said: “37 million Americans know myths when they see them. What myths do you see?”

Most of the signs were vandalized and in the ensuing uproar, the city effectively ended a tradition that began in 1953 and earned Santa Monica one of its nicknames, the City of the Christmas Story.

The Santa Monica Nativity Scenes Committee argues in its lawsuit that atheists have the right to protest, but that freedom doesn’t trump the Christians’ right to free speech.

“If they want to hold an opposing viewpoint about the celebration of Christmas, they’re free to do that — but they can’t interfere with our right to engage in religious speech in a traditional public forum,” said William Becker, attorney for the committee. “Our goal is to preserve the tradition in Santa Monica and to keep Christmas alive.”

Comments

eileen10 7 months ago

The athiests have the right to express themselves but I think it would have been better if they would have kept their anti stuff seperate from the Christian things that were displayed. I enjoy the festive season and I know the athiests don't which is fine but they could be considerate for how things have been done for so many years as far as displays etc. I wouldn't want to see their things and they don't want to see Christian things so wouldn't it make more sense to have seperate areas?

0

asb 7 months ago

"I enjoy the festive thing and I know the atheists don't . . . " Not at all true. The gathering festivals are as much a part of our biology as our spiritual or cultural nature. Every non-tropical culture has events related to this season, with the birth of Christ only one of many religious events.

0

eileen10 7 months ago

I didn't know that. Thank you for informing me.

0

tonto_goldberg 7 months ago

I don't agree. I can't think of a logical reason to limit myself to celebrating only those holidays that fit the religion that I practice.

0

TickledPink 7 months ago

Some Athiests are just as dogmatic in their lack of belief as certain Christians are in their fundamentalism. I find all of it sad. I'm not a Christian but I respect people's rights to believe and to celebrate and express their beliefs as long as they don't come knocking on my door to do so. I find many of the nativity scenes and Christian decorations quite pretty and I used to take my children around town to see them. What is so difficult about live and let live?

0

asb 7 months ago

" . . . as long as they don't come knocking on my door . . . " but of course with ANY government display, they ARE knocking on your door. Malls? fine. Public property? Maybe. ANY government area, building, or function? No. It is wrong.

0

JMO 7 months ago

Extremism of any type is generally a bad thing.

0

Sequoia 7 months ago

This just shows the kind of stupidity you get when you ask public institutions to try to "acknowledge" or "observe" spiritual truths. You can't "observe" one without "observing" them all. You end up with a cheesy display that is either exclusionary or so watered down it doesn't mean anything

You don't need to set up some hokey manger scene with a little plastic baby Jesus doll on some piece of ground. It's silly. These stories are metaphors for matters of the soul.

I don't need the government to tell me how to interpret sacred text, or "acknowledge" what I'm supposed to believe.

"The Christmas tradition" is a spiritual matter that has meaning only in the human heart, not in a booth on Palisades Park. Keep Jesus where he belongs, in the individual human heart... or you trivialize him.

0

spelchek 7 months ago

Perhaps Mr. Vix could up the ante and ridicule the Prophet Mohammed. He won't, because his beliefs stop at the fear his own life might be in jeopardy if he were to really practice what he preaches. Somebody didn't pick him to be on their team at one point in his life leaving him bitter and isolated. Picking on Christians makes him feel like a big man knowing Christians practice forgiveness and loving thy neighbor. Exploiting kindness to advance your agenda = coward.

0

connor 7 months ago

Ya can't wait until they advance their agenda to it's Sharia outcome. Of course before they have to suffer the side effects they will move and start all over again.

0

aj415 7 months ago

If they don't believe, why does it bother them so. Their actions of making fun of other people's beliefs, or cultures, religion. Would this not be considered bullying?

0

spelchek 7 months ago

Not in a libs eyes. Tolerance stops at their beliefs.

0

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting