Poll: Americans’ pessimism on economy growing

WASHINGTON — Americans are growing more pessimistic about the economy and handling it remains President Barack Obama’s weak spot and biggest challenge in his bid for a second term, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll.

And the gloomier outlook extends across party lines, including a steep decline in the share of Democrats who call the economy “good,” down from 48 percent in February to just 31 percent now.

Almost two-thirds of Americans — 65 percent — disapprove of Obama’s handling of gas prices, up from 58 percent in February. Nearly half, 44 percent, “strongly disapprove.” And just 30 percent said they approve, down from 39 percent in February.

These findings come despite a steady decline in gas prices in recent weeks after a surge earlier in the year. The national average for a gallon of gasoline stood at $3.75, down from a 2012 peak of $3.94 on April 1.

U.S. presidents have limited ability to affect gas prices, which are determined in international markets. However, the party out of power always blames whoever is president at the time for high gas prices, as Republican Mitt Romney is doing now and as Democrat Obama did in 2008 when George W. Bush sat in the Oval Office.

Of all the issues covered by the poll, Obama’s ratings on gas prices were his worst.

The public’s views tilt negative on his handling of the overall economy, 52 percent disapprove while 46 percent approve. In February, Americans were about evenly divided on his handling of the issue.

The economy is the No. 1 issue in the presidential race, thanks to the deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression and one of the shallowest-ever recoveries.

While the recession officially ended in summer 2009, unemployment remains stubbornly high, at 8.1 percent in April. Some 12.5 million Americans are out of work.

The increasing skepticism toward the recovery tracks a weakening overall economy as measured by the gross domestic product, and matches economic growth downgrades by many economic forecasters.

Against this background, the weak economy looms as a huge liability for Obama, and any drop in public confidence in his ability to deal with it can threaten his re-election prospects. Although Obama held broad advantages over Romney on handling social issues and protecting the country, when it came to the economy about the same percentage said they trust Romney to handle it as trust Obama.

Mindful of Obama’s vulnerability, Romney focuses frequently on the economy, suggesting that his business background makes him the candidate who can create jobs. Like most Republicans, he blames Obama’s policies for making the economy worse.

Obama acknowledges that times remain hard for many, but says conditions are slowly improving. He suggests the best chance for full recovery is if voters stick with him.

Heather Beckman, 29, of Lantana, Fla., is a Democrat who said she’s undecided about her vote but leaned to Obama. She believes the president can put the economy back on track, but not by himself. “At some point, the Republicans and Democrats have to come together to turn the economy around. As well as the rest of the country.”

However, Republican Roni Lovell, 68, of Edgewood, Wash., said Romney’s the one to help the economy turn the corner. “He has helped some really big companies come out of their financial woes,” said the retired school administrator. “Obama has proved he can’t do it and it’s time someone else gives it a try.”

The poll shows that optimism on an economic recovery earlier this year has all but stalled. The share of Americans describing the economy as “good” dropped 10 points since February, to 20 percent. Two-thirds see the economy as “poor” and about one in seven say it’s somewhere in between. And just 22 percent say the economy got better in the past month, down from 28 percent saying so in February.

Democrats remain more optimistic about the economy in the coming year than do independents and Republicans, but still, the percentage that is hopeful for improvement in the next year dipped 10 points since February.

Fewer than one in three expect their household’s economic fortunes to improve in the coming year, down from 37 percent in February. Eighteen percent see their finances as worsening, up from 11 percent in February.

And 35 percent expect the unemployment rate, which has been inching down for months, to start going back up. Thirty percent thought that in February. Independents are closer to Republicans than Democrats on that issue, with only 18 percent of independents and Republicans optimistic that the jobless rate will improve, while 40 percent of Democrats expect it to.

For now, Obama's approval rating stands at 53 percent. But a stalling recovery could cause it to slide.

The AP-GfK poll was conducted May 3-7 by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cell phone interviews with 1,004 adults nationwide and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.

Associated Press writer Stacy A. Anderson and News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed this report.

Web link:

www.ap-gfkpoll.com

Comments

Hugs 1 year ago

What American's really need now is a new President, not Obama.

1

JCLifer 1 year ago

That's what got us into this mess.

1

JCLifer 1 year ago

Nope. Everything was fine until Pelosi and Frank got in power the last two years of Bush's 2nd term. That is when the economy went to hell.

0

Littleinvestor 1 year ago

I wish I knew what the U.S. needs. I don't think anyone has the answer to this mess we are in. I am pretty sure we don't need another $2 Billion loss in six weeks by another huge bank. The big boys are going to drag us down again with their gambling with depositors' money.

0

spelchek 1 year ago

Poll: Americans’ pessimism on economy growing = Change You Can Believe In

1

JCLifer 1 year ago

The workforce participation rate is the lowest since 1981. Are we better off now than we were four years ago? NO.

1

RobHunterJohnson 1 year ago

No President Bushs inability to watch from 2001 to 2008 played a big role in where we are today, if McCain would have won, maybe we would have cured Republicans for a long time. Rob

0

spelchek 1 year ago

Hogwash. Democrats controlled the house and senate from 2007-2010 with two of those years accompanying a liberal president. Complete control of the purse strings. To say a lame duck president left us this mess is desperate and disingenuous.

1

RobHunterJohnson 1 year ago

It was failing when Bush had it. You can think anything you wish, but it is what it is. Rob

0

spelchek 1 year ago

And now it is failing worse. What is your point?

0

RobHunterJohnson 1 year ago

I do not believe you, I work construction, my annuity is growing, my (own) 401 is growing, and I am working since September 2011. I know how to gauge what is happening, quit watching fox, and take a look around. The recessions I have witnessed in my lifetime, show me that trickle down does not work , never has never will. Tell me what you and the Tea Party has planned to fix Social Security, Health Care and Medicare. Rob

0

RobHunterJohnson 1 year ago

Tell me how you and the Tea Party plan to fix Social Security, Medicare, and Health care you cannot Grace because there is no plan, except what I see from Ryan and that is unacceptable to me and alot of other folks who care about alot of issues. Rob

0

tonto_goldberg 1 year ago

Ryan's plan provides more tax cuts for higher income people and protects the bloated military budget at the expense of the poor and elderly. It's despicable and predictable.

0

spelchek 1 year ago

Yep. And current policy seems to be working out great. No need to try Ryan's plan when 8.1% unemployment and 500,000 Americans no longer looking for work is good policy to democrats. Nothing "despicable" about that.

0

tonto_goldberg 1 year ago

You're absolutely right. This is what I have been told. There are tax cuts for the wealthy according to FactCheck.org and the Tax Policy Center, spending cuts for social programs according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, and unrealistic economic assumptions according to the Washington Post. That's what is in the Ryan plan. Worse, the so-called economic analysis performed by the Congressional Budget Office was based on the unrealistic economic assumptions in the proposal - that's what they were required to use. That's what is in the Ryan plan.

You, on the other hand, are relying on your own imagination. I will trust the people with the college degrees, the research staff, and the computers.

0

JCLifer 1 year ago

The economy was going real strong until thr last two years of Bush. Those last two years were slso when Frank and Pelosi were ruining the economy

Is the country better off now than it was four years ago? NO.

Are you better off now than you wete four tears ago? NO.

The sad thing is that Romney is not the answer either. We are hosed..

0

spelchek 1 year ago

I couldn't agree more. Romney and Obama make me miss Reagan more than ever. Whether you like the man or not, he inspired. He looked forward and made progress with a democrat controlled congress. The current POTUS had the luxury of a democrat congress and simply blew it. He had all the cards stacked in his favor and to say that he is not to blame for "today's" economic state and blame it on "yesterday's" president is just troubling.

0

RobHunterJohnson 1 year ago

Reagan was smart enough to stregthen Social Security and he did it with compromise. Spelck and Grace would follow Ryan the Pied Piper right to the end. Rob

0

asb 1 year ago

Targeted tax cuts are welfare of a sort, in that they benefit a small group initially, toward the greater long term good, and can be useful to stimulate long term investment. But, just like social programs, taxes need constant scrutiny and adjustment, and right now we cannot afford more tax cuts, we need tax increases through the restoration of previous tax structures. Direct stimulus spending by every developed nation was needed to keep us out of a global depression caused by poor financial regulation and people doing what we do best - taking whatever we can get - and taxes are the best means of paying for that stimulus. In hindsight the TARP and other stimuli could've been managed better, duh! But that should be a management issue, not politics. Our present tax revenue is relatively the lowest in decades, and we need to adjust them upwards, not downwards, to pay down debt. Yes, cost control on government programs; including social, infrastructure and military, is important, but revenue is needed.

0

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting