Higher gas prices threaten economy if they persist
Saturday, March 17, 2012
WASHINGTON (AP) — Inflation remains tame throughout the U.S. economy, with one big exception: gas prices.
Those higher prices haven't derailed a steadily improving economy. But if they surpass $4 or $5 a gallon, experts fear Americans could pull back on spending, and job growth could stall, posing a potentially serious threat to the recovery.
And the longer prices remain high, the more they could imperil President Barack Obama's re-election hopes.
A few weeks ago, economists generally agreed that the economy was in little danger from higher gas prices as long as job growth remained strong. But fears are now mounting that gas prices could begin to weaken consumer confidence.
The average pump price nationwide is $3.83 a gallon. Energy analysts say it's bound to climb higher in the weeks ahead.
"It's a thorn in the side of the consumer and businesses," said Chris Christopher, an economist at IHS Global Insight. The economy this year "would have been better and stronger if we didn't have to deal with this."
So far, higher prices aren't undermining the economic recovery, which is getting a lift from strong job creation. It would take a big jump — to around $5 a gallon — before most economists would worry that growth would halt and the economy would slide into another recession.
That's because an improving economy is somewhat insulated from any threat posed by higher prices at the pump.
The risk is that gas prices could eventually slow growth by causing some people to cut spending on other goods, from appliances and furniture to electronics and vacations. Gasoline purchases provide less benefit for the U.S. economy because about half of the revenue flows to oil-exporting nations, though U.S. oil companies and gasoline retailers also benefit.
Many American businesses suffer, too. They must pay more for fuel and shipping and for materials affected by high oil prices, such as petroleum-based plastics. Profit margins get squeezed.
Even if prices ease after the summer driving season, don't expect gasoline to fall below $3 a gallon. The government estimates that this year's average will be $3.79, followed by $3.72 in 2013.
Most economists accept a rough guideline that a 25-cent rise in gas prices knocks about 0.2 percentage point off economic growth.
Gas prices also have an outsize impact on consumer confidence, Christopher noted. It's a high-frequency purchase. Consumers notice the price whether they're filling up or driving past a gas station.
Along with the unemployment rate and stock market levels, gasoline prices heavily determine how Americans see their financial health.
That effect was evident Friday when a decline was reported in the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan index of consumer sentiment. The result surprised some economists who had assumed that higher stock prices and lower unemployment would lift consumer sentiment.
The Michigan report showed that "gasoline worries ... are outweighing stock market gains and job growth" when it comes to influencing consumer attitudes, said Michael Hanson, an economist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
The price of gasoline has climbed 17 percent since the year began — to a national average of $3.83 a gallon. That's the highest ever for this time of year. A month ago, it was $3.52.
Gasoline prices have followed oil prices up. Oil is rising, in part, because of tensions surrounding Iran's nuclear program. Iranian leaders have threatened to close a shipping route into the Persian Gulf. Experts say the standoff could lead to tighter global oil supplies later this year.
Contributing to higher gas prices is stronger demand from China and other developing economies.
Most economists expect gas prices to top $4 a gallon by May. That would drag on consumer spending and the economy.
"It's like a tax," Hanson said.
Economists note that gas prices tend to hit consumer confidence especially hard once they surpass round numbers, such as $4 a gallon or $5 a gallon. Consumer confidence levels provide a rough guide to what Americans will actually do when at the mall or their favorite store.
A Gallup poll last week found that nearly half of Americans would make "significant" spending cuts in other areas if gas topped $5 a gallon. On average, Americans said gas prices of $5.30 to $5.35 are a "tipping point" that would cause them to make those cutbacks.
Motorists have responded to rising pump prices by driving fewer miles in more efficient vehicles. They've conserved so much fuel this year that they've effectively reduced gasoline spending even though a gallon is an average of 32 cents higher than it was a year ago, said Tom Kloza, chief oil analyst at the Oil Price Information Service.
"Gas prices really choked the consumer in 2008," Kloza said. "This year I'm not so sure."
Retailers have begun to worry that higher gas prices will eventually force many consumers to cut back.
"If gas prices do start (going) upward again and creeping back up to $4 and $5, I think that is going to be a problem for our customer," Charles Holley, Wal-Mart's chief financial officer, said this month.
Some trends in the economy should cushion the impact of higher gas prices. Americans saved more last year. That gives them some leeway to pay for costlier gas out of savings rather than cutting spending in other areas.
Easing the impact further, other energy prices have fallen even as gas costs have soared. The price of natural gas to residential consumers has dropped an average of 8 percent a year since 2009.
Consumers saved more money in January from lower natural gas and electricity prices than they paid in higher gas costs, Christopher said.
The price of gasoline will likely follow developments in Iran. Continued sparring between Iran and the West means prices will keep going up. But if Iran adopts a more conciliatory tone, oil and gasoline prices could tumble.
The outcome will help determine the U.S. elections in November. Obama has been under pressure to do something to ease prices even as the economy is producing its best job growth since the recession ended.
A Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted last week found that 59 percent of voters disapproved of the way Obama has handled the economy. A month ago, the same poll found that 53 percent disapproved.
Obama's Republican opponents have criticized him for blocking efforts to expand drilling in restricted areas of the Gulf of Mexico and in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge. In a TV interview this week, front-runner Mitt Romney said Obama should "absolutely" be held responsible for the higher prices because "he has not pursued policies that convince the world that America is going to become energy secure, energy independent."
The Obama administration argues that oil and gas prices are set by global demand and that those who promise a quick fix are lying to voters.
Associated Press Business Writers Anne D'Innocenzio and Chris Kahn in New York and Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this report.

Comments
Graceful 1 year, 2 months ago
What one individual has done more for higher oil prices? Obama. It is what he wants and he does not care what it does to the economy. All liberals that want lower oil prices need to support Romney.
hkchas 1 year, 2 months ago
~LOL~ Mitt is not the guy who turned us into a net oild exporting country, Obama is ....
Graceful 1 year, 2 months ago
You know better than that. Everyone knows better than that. OIl from public lands is down 20% in the last three years. America has produced more oiul INSPITE of the anti-American Obama. He has done nothing but increase misery in this nation. And he likes doing it.
veryserious 1 year, 2 months ago
President Obama is young , just like anyone raising a family Get OUT of the U.S.A. since you have such a problem withit. Do you have Children you teach to hate so they hurt others as well? What an example! NO THANKS.
viktorkowski 1 year, 2 months ago
oil production is just as consistent today as it was under bush according to the bureau of land management. we have actually imported 12% less oil now than we did last year and producing at least 120k barrels more domestically than last year. if you want more change than that you must do your part to decrease what you use. we hold only 2% of the worlds oil and use 25% of the supply.
viktorkowski 1 year, 2 months ago
derek hunter is a political columnist and political strategist. I deal in numbers. only numbers and not rhetoric. when he gets a degree in petroleum geology and takes a job with the BLM and starts reporting numbers I will read what he writes.
newone 1 year, 2 months ago
Gas was over $4 the last year Bush was in office....just saying! :-)
spelchek 1 year, 2 months ago
I find the Bush M.O. used by democrats amusing. You honestly think people have paid zero attention the last four years and will vote based on something that happened in 2008. Fine by me, keep it up.
newone 1 year, 2 months ago
I am not a democrat thank you, it seems to me that you have paid zero attention the years prior to Obama when gas was just as high, I am not saying Obama isn't to blame because he most defiantly is but what gets me is that Obama haters seem to forget we were in this mess before Obama came into office, you are just not willing to admit the fact that all of this does not land on Obama, the last 4 years do yes, but the years prior when this country started going downhill belongs to Bush.
viktorkowski 1 year, 2 months ago
gas prices can't be controlled. if we were to regulate futures like the states used to do we may be able to drop 15%. beyond that there is nothing that can be done. oil companies have to drill many more holes to find oil now and where they do find it they have to go much deeper which translates to higher production costs. The days of cheap oil are gone forever. adapt or go the way of the dinosaur
veryserious 1 year, 2 months ago
Well said sir. And respectfully. Production costs also include the man-power to drill which takes so much more time. Those men work for money. I do feel that a percentage could be reduced . However besides labor cost, The insurance for a company. But again, compare that to the tragic land -mining instances. Those mining companies pay nothing compared to the danger and loss of life. I do not know what the answer really is. I can tell in the long term, artifical oil, or alternative substitue (even beyond electric opperiation) will be the way of the future. Nothing of this nature has anything to do with President Obama. He suffers just as we do.
'PEOPLE READ YOU BIBLE----REVALATION-------THIS WAS FORSEEN".
JCLifer 1 year, 2 months ago
Yeah, the best way to deal with all the rising prices is to ask for a raise.
herekitty 1 year, 2 months ago
Clean congressl of everybody with more then 2 terms. And trade "1" bushel of Wheat or Oats or Corn for 3 or 4 barrels of oil. Or let them eat the oil!
ctygrl4ever 1 year, 2 months ago
It's all good and fine to speculate on who the responsible party is with this gas stuff....What I would like to know is this. WHY is gas 20 cents cheaper a gallon at the lake?.......and don't tell me it's a refinery or distribution.....we're talking 30 miles away people......sounds to me like everyone is so hot on blaming this on someone in Washington that they have allowed our local oil companies to have a free for all.....if they say we're not being gouged....they're lying.....
wyriontair 1 year, 2 months ago
The administrations gas is paid for by we taxpayers so I don't know how someone can claim the man in the white house is suffering and this admiinistration is definitely taking advantage of that. If, as the administration claims, drilling will not bring down oil prices then why are democrats, including the president, begging the saudi's and brazil to increase production?
martin2thetruth 1 year, 2 months ago
Oil Was an opportunity to find something safer. We all know oil requires people and plants to die, rot, n decay to be created by earth. It takes centuries to create. If we don't look for alternate energy forms, we will all be oil for whatever's left!
spelchek 1 year, 2 months ago
FOUR MORE YEARS!!!! FOUR MORE YEARS!!!!
RobHunterJohnson 1 year, 2 months ago
Why does North America supply Oil to Asia? Why are the Canadians looking to cross British Columbia with a Pipeline? Why are the Chinese involved with the Keystone? Rob
viktorkowski 1 year, 2 months ago
because its a global market. india and china are creating new automobile users everyday. so much that resources can't keep up with demand and never will be able. in response the chinese have become everyones friend. they are in nigeria, uganda, even wanting to build a pipeline across pakistan from iran, and yes canada. in the end china will get what they want. dig deep enough and follow the money. all roads lead to the silk road.
spelchek 1 year, 2 months ago
Another land mark achievement for the Obama administration. Where has the green money gone? Where are the jobs? Where are the cars that run on unicorn sprinkles with exhaust that smell like patchouli? Maybe a few more trillion into the green sector ought to fix things. That's the problem, we're not spending enough of someone elses money to get these issues resolved. Also, we need more incentives like regulation (no problem for this administration), if we're ever to spark any kind of entrepreneurial spirit in this country again.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID