Shootings further dent Americans’ support for war

WASHINGTON (AP) — The weekend massacre of Afghan civilians, allegedly carried out by a U.S. soldier, newly undermines the rationale for a war that a majority of Americans already thought wasn’t worth fighting. But the Obama administration and its allies insisted Monday the horrific episode would not speed up plans to pull out foreign forces.

President Barack Obama called the episode “tragic,” and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton called it “inexplicable.”

Obama told a television interviewer Monday that the killings underscore the need to hand over responsibility for security to Afghans. But he said it won’t lead to an early withdrawal of U.S. troops.

“I think it’s important for us to make sure that we get out in a responsible way so that we don’t end up having to go back in,” Obama told Pittsburgh station KDKA. “It makes me more determined to make sure that we’re getting our troops home. It’s time.”

Clinton told reporters at the United Nations in New York, “This terrible incident does not change our steadfast dedication to protecting the Afghan people and to doing everything we can to build a strong and stable Afghanistan.”

Administration officials were reacting to the weekend killing of 16 Afghan civilians, including nine children asleep in their beds. A U.S. Army staff sergeant is accused of slipping away from his base in the Taliban heartland of Kandahar and shooting nearby villagers in their homes.

Despite the deaths, “Our strategic objectives have not changed and they will not change,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said.

In an interview Monday with Denver station KCNC-TV, Obama said, “We’ve got to make sure that we’re caring for our soldiers, caring for our men and women in uniform who are serving so valiantly, and we’re caring for their families. And that’s why we’ve actually put more resources into dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries.”

“And obviously what happened this weekend was absolutely tragic and heartbreaking. But when you look at what hundreds of thousands of our military personnel have achieved under enormous strain, you can’t help but be proud generally.”

The killings were the latest in a series of deadly incidents that caused outrage for both Americans and Afghans.

The killing of Americans by their Afghan hosts and of Afghans by the Americans who are supposed to help them have forced an acute examination of a war strategy that calls for Afghans to assume greater responsibility for security through mentoring and “shoulder by shoulder” joint operations.

Obama expanded the Afghan war in the first year of his presidency, saying it was in keeping with U.S. national security interests in contrast to the Iraq war he opposed. But the war, now in its 11th year, remains a stalemate in much of the country, while the al-Qaida terror network that the war is supposed to deter has largely abandoned Afghanistan. U.S. commandos killed Sept. 11 mastermind Osama bin Laden last year.

“It’s been a decade, and frankly now that we’ve gotten bin Laden and we’ve weakened al-Qaida, we’re in a stronger position,” to hand over security control to the Afghans, Obama said in the KDKA interview.

The war is increasingly becoming a political headache for Obama, with American voters appearing frustrated and Republican rivals accusing him of mishandling it.

In results from a Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted before the killings and released Sunday, 55 percent of respondents said they think most Afghans oppose what the United States is trying to do there. And 60 percent said the war in Afghanistan has been “not worth fighting.”

Many Republicans — who as a party fought against a quick exodus in Iraq and criticized Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign promise to end that war — are now reluctant to embrace a continued commitment in Afghanistan.

“We have to either make a decision to make a full commitment, which this president has not done, or we have to decide to get out and probably get out sooner” than planned in 2014, GOP presidential hopeful Rick Santorum said Monday. He spoke on NBC’s “Today” show.

Said GOP presidential contender Newt Gingrich: “I think that we’re risking the lives of young men and women in a mission that may, frankly, not be doable.”

Still, Mitt Romney said he “wouldn’t jump to a new policy based upon some deranged, crazy person.”

Under an agreement with the Afghan government, some U.S. and NATO forces are to stay in Afghanistan at least through the end of 2014.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has sought assurances that the foreign forces that support his fragile government will not leave en masse. He is due to leave office in 2014, and both he and Western leaders have said it will take that long to get the Afghan military ready to take on Taliban-led militants who are unlikely to quit the fight.

Carney would not say whether Obama worries that the killings increase security risks for Americans in Afghanistan. The United States has about 90,000 troops in the country; that number is scheduled to drop to 68,000 by the end of September.

Military movements were kept to a minimum Monday near the shooting site as commanders waited to see how the local population reacts, but there were no huge protests in the country. U.S. officials were worried that the Taliban would stoke public outrage this week in an attempt to turn the regular Friday prayer sessions into mass demonstrations.

“We’re fully aware that this has the possibility of raising ire and emotions in a place where tensions are already running high,” said State Department spokesman Mark Toner. “We would appeal for calm. “

Like other U.S. officials, Toner promised a thorough U.S. investigation and prosecution.

Pentagon press secretary George Little said the weekend house-by-house killing spree has not changed the U.S. approach to the war. Without offering any details about the killings, he stressed that it should be seen as an aberration.

“This is having no impact on the war effort at this time,” he said. “No one should think that we are steering away from our partnership with the Afghan people, from our partnership with the Afghan security forces and from our commitment to prosecute the war effort.”

But the strategy is already changing in small ways, with plans to shift combat operations to the Afghans earlier than once envisioned and some of the NATO partners largely recruited to the war by the U.S. increasingly entertaining an earlier exit.

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting

News Tribune - comments