Mo. case tests party host’s role in fatal crash
Monday, June 25, 2012
KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — A Jackson County judge is considering whether a woman can be tried for involuntary manslaughter after she allegedly served alcohol to minors before one of them became involved in a fatal road accident.
If Judge Peggy Stevens McGraw allows the charge against Sandra S. Triebel, 47, to go to trial, Jackson County prosecutors would be trying to overcome a long legal tradition in Missouri of blaming only drunken drivers for fatal accidents, rather than the person who supplied the alcohol, The Kansas City Star reported (http://bit.ly/NlEWe6 ).
Triebel is accused of providing alcohol at a party at a Kansas City rental home on Oct. 31, 2009. One of the guests, then-19-year-old Kenneth S. Blake II, was drunk when he left the party and was involved in a traffic accident that killed a passenger in another vehicle, Laura B. Reynolds, 16.
Blake, whose blood alcohol level was more than 2 1/2 times the legal limit, later pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and two counts of assault.
Jackson County prosecutors say they charged Triebel with involuntary manslaughter because she allegedly bought and mixed the drinks and knew Blake was a minor who was drunk when he left to drive himself home but did not call police.
That constitutes the kind of criminal negligence required for involuntary manslaughter, said Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker.
“A reasonable standard of care for children is much higher than what Ms. Triebel exhibited,” Baker said at a hearing last week. “A really wonderful human being lost her life for it. She was a promising teenage girl and she lost her life because of all the actions Ms. Triebel put in play.”
Triebel also faces two misdemeanor counts that typically accompany such accidents: one count of supplying liquor to a minor and one count of allowing a minor to drink intoxicating liquor on her property.
Triebel’s attorney, Tiffany Leuty, argued that prosecutors could not demonstrate that Triebel caused the accident.
“We don’t hold people responsible for a third party’s actions,” Leuty said. “This is nothing new. People serve underage people all the time in Missouri, but we don’t have another person charged with involuntary manslaughter.”
Leuty cited a decade of appeals court rulings in civil cases that has established a legal precedent that gives almost complete protection from civil liability to people who serve alcohol to guests, including minors, in their home.
Assistant prosecutor Janette Rodecap cited a 2003 case in which a Pennsylvania appeals court allowed a woman’s manslaughter conviction to stand under a set of facts similar to those alleged in the Triebel case. She said the Pennsylvania judges obviously understood that fatal traffic accidents are not surprising when adults give alcohol to teenagers.
“This is not some shock that this might happen,” Rodecap said. “It was reasonably foreseeable.”
She also argued that Missouri law would permit the manslaughter charge because Triebel actions were a “contributing proximate cause” of the 16-year-old’s death. That concept allows, for example, prosecutors to charge a burglar with murder if an armed homeowner kills the burglar’s accomplice.
Ralph Blackman, president of the Century Council, a nonprofit funded by the liquor industry that fights drunken driving and underage drinking, said if Triebel is convicted and the case stands on appeal, Missouri would be on the “hard end” of penalties nationwide.
“The penalties ought to be tougher as the level of irresponsibility goes up,” Blackman said.
———
Information from: The Kansas City Star, http://www.kcstar.com

Comments
kentheco 11 months, 4 weeks ago
If a bar owner can be held responsible for the actions of an adult drinker, then the punishment for providing alcohol to a minor and the resulting death should be greater.
Sequoia 11 months, 4 weeks ago
The law is much more aggressive these days towards parents who throw beer parties for underage kids.
Back in the day, you'd find the cool parent who would stock the fridge with light beer, rent a few movies, and took everyone's keys away until morning.
Dummies who forget the last part (take the keys) have brought more heat down on these partties.
Motor vehicle fatalities are the leading cause of death among teenagers. Statistically, the years just after you get a drivers' license are the most dangerous of your life.
As a society, I guess we're willing to sacrifice a certain number of our young people for the "freedom" of car travel. Is it freedom when you need a car to get anywhere worth going? That's a topic for another day.
Whether from texting or drinking or other carelessness, the car will claim at least one student out of every high school class. Don't let it be you.
JMO 11 months, 4 weeks ago
I completely agree with kentheco. As a parent, I'm responsible for every kid that enters my house. If they are drinking, they sure as heck won't have gotten it from me, and I'd not only take their keys, I'd call their parents or if they wouldn't tell me their parent's number, I'd call the cops. Sorry to my own kid who may be terribly unpopular after that - but Too. Darn. Bad. There's a reason it's illegal. Whether the kid is 15 or 20, it's illegal. Period. You don't want to go to jail? Don't give kids alcohol.
Paroquet 11 months, 4 weeks ago
Please note: I am not condoning either of the RPs decisions. Kenneth S. Blake II knew he was too young to consume alcohol legally. He knew he was drunk when he left the party. He drank voluntarily, and drove voluntarily.
At 17, one is an adult under the criminal code. Younger than 17, certification as an adult is required, meaning "minors" can be considered adults when making decisions all the way back to the cut-off age for certification. From 14-16 it is almost a given in the event of violent crime or narcotics manufacture/distribution. At 19, all privileges attendant to being an adult are present save for the ability to purchase or possess alcohol.
JMO 11 months, 4 weeks ago
I fully agree that Mr. Blake should be and properly was prosecuted. I simply feel that the person serving the minor should also be prosecuted.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID