UK agency opens criminal probe of bank rate fixing
Saturday, July 7, 2012
LONDON (AP) — Britain's Serious Fraud Office said Friday that it has formally opened a criminal investigation of the manipulation of a key market interest rate that has shaken Barclays.
The bank was fined $435 million last week by U.S. and British agencies for making false reports of its borrowing costs between 2005 and 2009, specifically of the London interbank offered rate, or LIBOR, which influences the costs of a range of financial instruments including home mortgages.
Regulators are known to be looking into similar allegations against other banks in Britain and elsewhere, but Barclays is the only bank so far to have been publicly shamed. The Serious Fraud Office announcement did not mention Barclays by name but referred to "the LIBOR matter."
The agency said it was uncertain whether the investigation would result in charges.
Barclays' share price closed 2 percent lower at 164.75 pence following the announcement.
This week, Bob Diamond resigned as chief executive of the bank and Chairman Marcus Agius announced his intention to leave as soon a replacement has been appointed.
The Serious Fraud Office could prosecute individuals or the company. The U.S. Justice Department said last week that it would not prosecute the Barclays because of its full cooperation in the investigation, but it might pursue charges against individuals.
The British Parliament voted Thursday to launch its own investigation of the banking industry.
Barclays is among several banks which submit daily data on the rates they are paying to borrow from other banks. That data is used to calculate LIBOR.
Barclays has admitted that managers decided in 2007 and 2008 to sometimes submit rates which were lower than the bank's actual costs. Managers were concerned that its submissions, which were consistently higher than other banks, indicated that the company was having trouble borrowing money because it was in financial trouble.
Beginning in 2005, individual Barclays traders were found to have persuaded colleagues to make false submissions.
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting