Millions face higher taxes real soon without fix
Monday, December 17, 2012
WASHINGTON (AP) — Millions of families and businesses will get hit by big tax increases a lot sooner than many realize if Congress and the White House don’t agree on a plan to skirt the year-end fiscal cliff of higher tax rates and big government spending cuts.
In fact, they already have.
More than 70 tax breaks enjoyed by individuals and businesses expired at the end of 2011. If Congress doesn’t extend them retroactively back to the beginning of this year, a typical middle-class family could face a $4,000 tax increase when it files its 2012 return in the spring, according to an analysis by H&R Block, the tax preparing giant.
At the same time, businesses could lose dozens of tax breaks they have enjoyed for years, including generous credits for investing in research and development, write-offs for restaurants and retail stores that expand or upgrade, and tax breaks for financial companies with overseas subsidiaries.
Even if Congress does act, last-minute changes to federal tax laws could make it difficult for taxpayers to figure out their 2012 tax bills.
“We’re really expecting this upcoming tax season to be one of the more challenging ones on record,” said Kathy Pickering, executive director of The Tax Institute at H&R Block. “For your 2012 returns there’s so much confusion about what will be impacted.”
Much of Washington is consumed by negotiations over how to address automatic tax increases scheduled to take effect next year. That’s when tax cuts first enacted under President George W. Bush, and extended under President Barack Obama, are scheduled to expire. A temporary reduction in the Social Security payroll tax is set to vanish as well.
Obama wants to let the Bush-era tax cuts expire on incomes above $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for married couples, while extending the tax cuts for people making less.
House Speaker John Boehner and other Republicans have said they are open to more tax revenue through reducing or eliminating unspecified tax breaks.
But Boehner, R-Ohio, late last week moved toward the president’s position, proposing raising top rates for people earning more than $1 million in exchange for deeper spending cuts, particularly in health care and other mandatory spending programs.
Obama has not accepted that offer, according to people familiar with the talks, but Boehner’s offer suggests that the negotiations are being renewed after appearing stalled just days ago.
Lost in the debate is a big package of tax breaks that already expired for 2012. Lawmakers in both parties say they expect those tax cuts to be addressed in any deal to avoid the “fiscal cliff.” But they don’t want to deal with them separately because that would reduce pressure to reach a broader budget agreement.
The biggest tax increase facing individuals for this year is the alternative minimum tax, or AMT. The tax was first enacted in 1969 to ensure that wealthy people can’t use tax breaks to avoid paying any federal taxes. The AMT, however, was never adjusted for inflation, so Congress routinely does that to keep it from imposing hefty tax increases on millions of middle-income families.

Comments
RobHunterJohnson 5 months ago
"But Boehner, R-Ohio, late last week moved toward the president’s position, proposing raising top rates for people earning more than $1 million in exchange for deeper spending cuts, particularly in health care and other mandatory spending programs. " How about Mental Health Care? Rob
JCLifer 5 months ago
We might be able to have it if we had the 47% paying some taxes. Having nearly half the population riding the bus for free isn't gonna help us buy gas for the bus, let alone air conditioning.
spelchek 5 months ago
These cuts were a bad idea to begin with. The government needs us to pitch in our "fair share" to lessen the blow of their spending binge. Let us all give back a little and help this administration prove that by raising taxes and growing government we will continue the economic recovery that began the moment Obama took office when he declared shovel ready jobs were at the ready. Government spends wisely and never gives themselves raises when they accomplish nothing or stealthily force a bill through with the help of bribes under transparency promises, so giving more is only fair. And if this doesn't work the least we could do is blame a minority party and a President that took office 12 years ago for our failures (no worries, Democrat constituency will buy anything we sell them; just look at how we confused them with women's vagin@s to distract them from the unemployment numbers and the litany of broken promises of 2008.) Forward.
linoge 5 months ago
Talk about a ramble. I can't argue with anything being said, because I don't know what the heck you're talking about.
JCLifer 5 months ago
I HOPE this will CHANGE as we are MOVING FORWARD.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID