Analysis: Obama could risk going over 'cliff'
Thursday, December 6, 2012
WASHINGTON (AP) — It may be just a bluff or a bargaining ploy, but the White House is signaling that President Barack Obama is willing to let the country go over the "fiscal cliff," a hard-line negotiating strategy aimed at winning concessions from Republicans on taxes.
If Washington really does fail to avert the looming series of tax hikes and spending cuts, the White House will portray Republicans as the culprits for insisting on protecting tax cuts for the wealthy, an effort the administration is laying the groundwork for now.
"This is a choice of the Republican Party," said Dan Pfeiffer, White House communications director. "If they are willing to do higher rates on the wealthy, there's a lot we can talk about. And if they are not, then they'll push us over the cliff."
But going over the cliff also would be full of risk for a president fresh off re-election and facing at least two more years of divided government.
Ending the year without a deal could roil financial markets and dent consumer confidence just as the economy is strengthening. It could make it harder for Obama to get Republican help on his second-term priorities like overhauling the immigration system and the nation's tax code, or in getting potential Cabinet replacements confirmed.
And it would signal to the country that the president's campaign prediction that the GOP "fever" would break following his re-election was a pipe dream.
House Speaker John Boehner says Obama is playing a risky game. "If the president really wants to avoid sending the economy over the fiscal cliff, he has done nothing to demonstrate it," the speaker said.
But Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner appeared to signal that the administration might do just that — go past the cliff if necessary.
In an interview Wednesday with CNBC, Geithner was asked if the administration was prepared to go over the fiscal cliff if taxes do not increase on the wealthy. "Oh, absolutely," he said.
"There's no prospect in an agreement that doesn't involve those rates going up on the top 2 percent of the wealthiest of Americans," Geithner added.
He also said the administration was also prepared to walk away from a deal that did not include raising the debt ceiling.
"We are not prepared to have the American economy held hostage to periodic threats ... to default on our obligations," Geithner said.
White House advisers say the president wants to avoid going into next year without a tax and spending deal, a scenario they say would hurt the economy. Obama, addressing business leaders Wednesday, said the White House and Republicans could reach an agreement "in about a week" if the GOP drops its opposition to raising taxes on families making more than $250,000 a year.
"If we can get the leadership on the Republican side to take that framework, to acknowledge that reality, than the numbers actually aren't that far apart," Obama said.
But with few public signs that Republicans are close to taking that step, administration officials are hardening their warning that Obama willing to risk going over the cliff.
Of course, the White House warning could be a bluff, offered in the belief that Republicans are unlikely to back down on taxes unless they believe Obama is willing to go over the cliff.
The White House says Obama's firm stand on tax rate increases for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans is driven by economics. The debt-saddled country can't afford to continue with the George W. Bush-era tax cuts, the president and his advisers argue.
Obama has made that case to Republicans before only to back down in the final stages of negotiations. But this time around, the president and his team believe they hold the political leverage.
There is some evidence to bolster that notion. Taxes were a centerpiece of the presidential campaign, with Obama running on a pledge to end the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and return their rates to where they were in the 1990s, when the economy was thriving.
Exit polls showed that 60 percent of voters supported that position, an even higher percentage than backed Obama's re-election.
A new poll also suggests a majority of Americans would blame Republicans if the government goes over the fiscal cliff. Just 27 percent of those surveyed said they would blame Obama, compared with 53 percent who said they would point the finger at the GOP, according to the Washington Post-Pew Research Center Poll.
Seeking to cement those impressions, the White House is casting Republicans as willing to forgo tax cuts for the middle class in order to protect lower rates for wealthier Americans. Rates for all income earners will go up at the end of the year if both sides can't reach a deal.
In turn, Republicans say Obama is acting like a stubborn partisan who will put the economy in peril in order to get his way.
"My sense is the White House wants to go over the cliff," said Tony Fratto, a former Treasury and White House official under President George W. Bush. "That may be the only way they get rates they want."
Going over the cliff could mark a new low in the relationship between the president and congressional Republicans. While the contentious debates earlier in Obama's first term over funding the government and raising the nation's borrowing limit went right up to the edge, both sides were always able to reach a deal.
As Obama ran for re-election, he sought to assure voters weary of Washington's bickering that things would be better if he won a second term.
Speaking to supporters in June, he said, "I believe that if we're successful in this election — when we're successful in this election — that the fever may break."
"My hope, my expectation, is that after the election, now that it turns out that the goal of beating Obama doesn't make much sense because I'm not running again, that we can start getting some cooperation again," he added optimistically.
EDITOR'S NOTE — Julie Pace covers the White House for The Associated Press.

Comments
spelchek 5 months, 2 weeks ago
Do it. Time to put your wallet where your vote is. Let the breaks expire for all in the name of "fairness". I feel guilty not contributing enough of my paycheck to the cause, and besides, the government knows how to spend our money better than we do. Roll out the new Obamacare taxes. Let the loopholes created by republicans and democrats get closed. Raise the taxes on dividends and investments. Everyone knows that when government overspends, then holds the middle-class hostage and used as bargaining chips at the negotiation table, the only way out is to punish those not giving enough to the cause. We're all in this together. We stand united in giving more of our money to government in the name of fairness. Now, I know a lot of you democrats have already protested the Bush tax cuts by paying the Clinton era tax rates ever since the Bush tax cuts got implemented. Taking the Bush cuts and now not wanting them to expire would look hypocritical. That is why you are so eager to get the rest of us back to the Clinton rates before Bush took control. Taxing is the only way out of this mess and I know the rest of you feel the same way about sharing the burden in the name of patriotism.
"It's time to be patriotic ... time to jump in, time to be part of the deal, time to help get America out of the rut." -- Joe Biden | Vice Jester
connor 5 months, 2 weeks ago
Of course Obummer want's to let the Bush era tax rates expire and revert back on everyone not just the so called rich. By refusing to cut spending and not negotiating with the Republican Congress he figures he can turn it around and get more taxes from everyone while blaming the Republicans for it. Of course the automatic cuts will kick in but he can blame that one on Congress as well and he knows his worshipers will believe him anyway. More than likely his meeting with Madcow and the rest of the MSDNC hacks was to brief them on that message they are to begin spreading.
Raising taxes on the rich isn't going to get Obummer and the Cleftwing socialists near the amount of money they need so they are going for the whole tax base. It will even look like it might work for the first year or so with that much tax money coming in. Increasing taxes usually shows an increase in revenue for the first year or two until the effects trickle up.
spelchek 5 months, 2 weeks ago
Check out McConnell forcing the Senate Dem's to vote on Geithner's latest budget proposal. Reid, wont' have any of it. Makes the id10tic statements about Republicans being obstructionists look....well......id10tic.
thehill.com/video/senate/271255-mcconnell-calls-for-vote-on-obamas-ridiculous-deficit-reduction-plan
JCLifer 5 months, 2 weeks ago
Obummer is gonna let us go over the cliff, and then try to blame the republicans for it.
What kind of leadership is that?
"The buck gets passed here..."
spelchek 5 months, 2 weeks ago
How many Senate dems have voted for his budgets in the past? The record doesn't support republicans getting the blame but as we both know, blaming is all they have.
Delbert 5 months, 1 week ago
If the politions can't settle this, I feel that they should be replaced . And if they go holiday without settling it, I see no need for them to return. If I had complete healthcare and full retirement, I wouldn't care as much about the low income, under insured,and the retired people. I'cant belive that they want to take away something that I paid for and looked forward to all my life. They waste more money then I can imagine. All they need to do is cut some of the money that they send to every country in the world.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID