GOP leaders remove 4 from plum House committees

This Sept. 27, 2010 file photo shows Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kansas speaking in Emporia, Kansas, before winning his seat in Congress. House Speaker John Boehner's decision to take plum committee assignments away from four Republican lawmakers after they bucked party leaders on key votes isn't going over well with conservative advocacy groups. Huelskamp will lose his seat on the House Budget Committee chaired by Rep. Paul Ryan next year.

This Sept. 27, 2010 file photo shows Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kansas speaking in Emporia, Kansas, before winning his seat in Congress. House Speaker John Boehner's decision to take plum committee assignments away from four Republican lawmakers after they bucked party leaders on key votes isn't going over well with conservative advocacy groups. Huelskamp will lose his seat on the House Budget Committee chaired by Rep. Paul Ryan next year. Photo by The Associated Press.

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Speaker John Boehner's decision to take plum committee assignments away from four conservative Republican lawmakers after they bucked party leaders on key votes isn't going over well with advocacy groups that viewed them as role models.

Reps. Tim Huelskamp of Kansas and Justin Amash of Michigan will lose their seats on the House Budget Committee chaired by Rep. Paul Ryan next year. And Reps. Walter Jones of North Carolina and David Schweikert of Arizona are losing their seats on the House Financial Services Committee.

The move is underscoring a divide in the Republican Party between tea party-supported conservatives and the House GOP leadership.

"This is a clear attempt on the part of Republican leadership to punish those in Washington who vote the way they promised their constituents they would — on principle — instead of mindlessly rubber-stamping trillion dollar deficits and the bankrupting of America," said Matt Kibbe, president of the tea party group FreedomWorks.

Michael Steel, a spokesman for Boehner, would only say Tuesday that the party's steering committee chaired by the speaker made the decision "based on a range of factors."

Groups aligned with the tea party movement were generally big supporters of Huelskamp, Amash and Schweikert. Jones is viewed more as a conservative maverick than a tea party Republican. He has frequently siding against GOP leaders on a range of issues over the years. For example, he voted against the GOP budget because he opposed the changes proposed for Medicare.

Schweikert said it was made clear to him "I should vote for the team more."

"Look, we're walking into the 113th Congress with a smaller majority," Schweikert said. "I would have though the fixation would have been family unity. This isn't the way you start a family meeting."

"The GOP leadership might think they have silenced conservatives, but removing me and others from key committees only confirms our conservative convictions," Huelskamp said in a statement Tuesday. "This is clearly a vindictive move and a sure sign that the GOP establishment cannot handle disagreement."

All four lawmakers had voted against the summer 2011 deal negotiated between Republican leaders and President Barack Obama for extending the government's ability to borrow money in exchange for $1 trillion in spending cuts and the promise of another $1 trillion in reduced deficits. Three of the four, the exception being Schweikert, voted against the Ryan-written GOP budget blueprint that the House passed last March.

Their removal from key committees with jurisdiction over the two issues was viewed by some as a signal to other Republican lawmakers to look favorably on whatever final deal Boehner and Obama put together to avert a "fiscal cliff" combination of automatic tax increases and spending cuts in January.

"It's sending a clear message to get behind the leadership no matter what the policy is, and that is contrary to what the Republicans supposedly stand for," Freedomworks' Kibbe said.

"If it was intended to be a signal, it's going to be a weak signal because the majority of conservatives are going to do what they think is right based on principle," Jones, the North Carolina congressman, said.

Amash said he has not been told specifically why he was removed, only that it was not based on his votes and that he should go talk to leadership. He said he voted with the Budget Committee's leadership 95 percent of the time. He said the move is likely to make him more independent in the future.

"Being nice to leadership and playing well with them doesn't pay off," Amash said. "They expect a near total agreement with their approach."

The changes in committee assignments could bring about more discipline from the GOP on high-priority issues next Congress, but conservatives were taking the news as an attack on their priorities.

"As the sun rises this morning we can look at John Boehner, Eric Cantor and Kevin McCarthy and know the opposition is not just across the aisle, but in charge of our own side in the House of Representatives," Erick Erickson wrote on the conservative website, RedState. "All the time and energy I would otherwise have to spend to convince conservatives that these gentlemen would be a problem for the GOP has been spared. They've proven it themselves."

Comments

wow 6 months, 2 weeks ago

The EMPLOSITION continues. Maybe Boehner shoud just admit, that if he cannot agree with the President on anything, because his party has vowed if he does, they will revoke his tanning privilege's...and that wouild leave him looking like the "pale, elder, political hack" that he truly is.

0

spelchek 6 months, 2 weeks ago

"“today I’m pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office. This will not be easy. It will require us to make difficult decisions and face challenges we’ve long neglected. But I refuse to leave our children with a debt that they cannot repay — and that means taking responsibility right now, in this administration, for getting our spending under control.” -- Barack Obama | 2009

0

jcguy25 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Oh no.. the sky is falling! the sky is falling! Do you actually think the more you say it the more chances it will come true? Or is that just your wish? Just like the Romney landslide you predicted? That's what I thought.

0

3633 6 months, 2 weeks ago

America will not ever get better or things won't change because all we do is fight, over anything. However we are all over the world trying to get other countries to accept Democrary, but we don't honor it ourselves. Do you think our parents wanted us to have this debt, just as you say we don't want to leave it to our kids or grandkids! Well, how about coming together to solve things and quit bickering!!!! Let's work on how we can improve things right here in Jeff City, you know the change starts with us!!! Any ideas, we have a whole group of people with different ideas, how about we start working together and quit all this back and forth!!!

0

JCLifer 6 months, 2 weeks ago

You cannot come together when the love of self and self-interest is much greater than love of country and love for all.

0

wow 6 months, 2 weeks ago

My intent was to point out the Republican party is self-destructing from with-in...pardon my lack of the correct use of the english language:) But that still doesn't stop the fact that I am correct...Boehner and his crew for some odd reason have forgotten that in Nov the majority of the American's said that the recently re-elected President's views and plans were what the majority of Americans wanted to happen. I mean after all that is why PRESIDENT OBAMA GOT RE-ELECTED and Mitt and his side kick got sent home! So instead of saying ok on this budget thing...the far to many Republicans wanna still fight against raising the taxes on the rich....that isn't making them any friends and slowly but surely the memebrs of their own party are starting to agree with President Obama. hence the inside the party explosion!! The maority of Americans agree with the President on the tax, health care, ending the war, shutting down Guantanimo, taking care of Veteran's, fair pay for all, especiallly women, issues. I mean these are the cornerstone of what got the man re-elected. So Mr. Bonehead and you other's, this stuff was decided back in Nov 2012..so what's the hold up?

0

connor 6 months, 2 weeks ago

My bet is Boehner's constituents didn't vote majority for Obama and neither did the people around here so our Reps are looking out for us. That means putting a stop to the spending which the Democrats and the White House have refused to do. All Obummer wants is more money to spend. Period.

If the people of the United States were all so anxious to give Obummer another term with a blank check they wouldn't have put the majority Republican house back in office at the same time.

No, What the majority of the government reliant voters want is gridlock. Gridlock they hope will keep their government pensions and government spending for them but stop it from getting out of control any further.

I hope the Republican's in the House hold out and demand cuts (real cuts not just a reduction in spending increases) but I have my doubts they will.

0

JCLifer 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Obama got reelected because he is half black.

0

connor 6 months, 2 weeks ago

He got the Black vote because he is NOT White and Male not because he is half black. He got the government employees vote because they hope he can keep the pensions flowing or at least they think he won't cut em. same with the welfare crowd.

0

wow 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Hey, he got elected by the majority of American's who agreed with his plans. So this stuff that's happening now is crazy. As for the President's race...he's human which should be good enough to meet the standards for being elected...as I do believe we cannot elect a Kling-on to this office. Mr. Obama is also American...again meeting the standard for office. He is also a "Negro"....if ya think he's anything else...all ya have to do is read some of these comments from the "good ole boyz". Although what they call him most certainly begins with the letter "N" and ends with "ER"! Yet after talking with them you'll surely know that he is not regarded as white, regardless of who his mother was. Still this man has been legally elected to the office of President of the United States of America, so like it or not. Ya gotta get with his programs...after all most Americans do.

0

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting