College Debt Falls Heaviest on Middle-Income Students

Study finds upper and lower income students manage to avoid heavy education debt

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) earlier this year raised the alarm over student debt, noting that the toll of outstanding student loans is now over $1 trillion.

Who owes this money and how are they ever going to pay it back? A researcher at the University of Wisconsin has found that the student debt burden falls heaviest on students from middle-income families.

Upper income students don't need loans. Low-income students have a number of aid opportunities. But researcher Jason Houle says for many middle-income students, loans are the only form of student aid available to them.

Middle-income squeeze

Houle calls it the “middle-income squeeze.” The families of these young adults make too much money for their children to qualify for adequate financial aid benefits, but not enough to afford the rising costs of tuition, room and board, and additional university fees.

In his study, Houle found nearly 41 percent of all students left school with some student loan debt, and the average debt among those students was more than $22,000.

“Young adults from middle-income families are at the highest risk for student loan debt,” Houle said. “As tuition costs continue to rise and outpace inflation, students increasingly use loans as the primary means of financial aid.”

Among those who left school with student loan debt, Houle found that on average young adults from middle-income backgrounds, whose families earned between $40,000 and $59,000 annually, owed over $6,000 more in student loan debt than their low income peers whose families made less than $40,000 per year.

Similarly, students from somewhat more affluent middle-income backgrounds, whose families made between $60,000 and $99,000 annually, racked up nearly $4,000 more in student loan debt than young adults whose families earned less than $40,000 per year.

Pell grants go mostly to lower-income students

Over 90 percent of all Pell Grant recipients come from families with annual incomes of less than $40,000.

“Young adults whose families make just over $40,000 are less likely to qualify for such student aid packages, and tend to suffer a disproportional burden of student loan debt,” Houle said.

Houle looked at other factors besides income. He sound that students whose parents had less than a college degree were also at a higher risk of accumulating student loan debt. African American students were also significantly more likely than their white peers to rack up student loan debt. In addition, he found that young adults with single parents or step families were more likely than students whose biological parents were together, to incur student loan debt.

As college graduates struggle to find high-wage jobs in today’s economy, inflated student loan debt forces young adults to begin their careers at an increased risk of default and penalties for missed payments. Bankruptcy is not an option for students struggling to pay off their student loans, which, Houle said, makes student loan debt a very unique and dangerous liability.

Story provided by ConsumerAffairs.
Consumer Affairs

Comments

Graceful 9 months, 4 weeks ago

An example of government making it harder for the middle class. That seems to be the primary result of all government programs.

0

asb 9 months, 4 weeks ago

Grace this new attack on school loans can only have one source, folks who would reduce competition from the lower classes. This is coming directly from the same fountain that cuts at every attempt to give people a shot at higher station. And you're buying it. Your education is failing you here, a minimum of critical thinking (stilll not a felony in Texas) would show you the value of an educated middle class, with less government help than our TIFF tendancies, and a whole lot more benefit. More than one GOPer convening in Tampa would say "we don't need educated people stirrin' things up, we'll outsource those jobs." And the song that pell grants somehow hurt the people borrowing the money is highly processed balogna. It's the same as saying that welfare creates a dependent class. No doubt there's a spark in that smoulder but by and large low cost loans (most of which are paid off contrary to FRight wing claims) help the borrower, the lender, our culture and our future. But I can see where one who sees no future and little value in our culture might not see all these benefits.

0

JCLifer 9 months, 4 weeks ago

Why not get rid of the Pell Grants and the government subsidized student loans and reduce tuition so folks don't need grants and loans to go to school? Pay for the school through proper government appropriations. Some states have free community college for all students who want to go and earn an Associates degree and get some marketable job skills.

We are already paying big bucks so cronies and campaign donors can skim money off the students loans and grants. Quit paying that money and use it to benefit students and the society as a whole.

Free public education has been used to pay for high school for years. Now a high school diploma is worthless for getting a good-paying job- much different than the 1950s. I see no problem with paying for free Associates degrees for everyone so they can actually use their diplomas to get a job again.

0

asb 9 months, 4 weeks ago

Fair questions. Free college didn't even work in California, it's too expensive. Some brilliant students can even afford reduced tuition or low interest loans, and we need as many bright kids as we can get. I'll put this like Petunia or Gabrielle . . . tell me more about the skimming and other abuses. As far as I know, while many student loans are lost, most are paid, and the lending institution are getting small administrative fees and interest, like any subsidized banking system. No doubt there are abuses, but free schools, taxpayer funded, would have as many abuses. I think you're repeating somebody's new evil here, whether you know it or not.

0

JCLifer 9 months, 4 weeks ago

Something has got to be done. Many kids are getting saddled with tens of thousands of dollars of debt or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. If they don't finish school, they are still stuck with it. If they do finish, they graduate and have the equivalent of a home mortgage around their neck. Many of these loans go to private schools with very well paid staff and executives. Heck- many of the public colleges and universities have very fancy facilities and expensive staff. How much does MOHELA run by cronies make for servicing these loans?

0

dvdmiller 9 months, 4 weeks ago

A better system needs to be in place. As a parent of two college students, I'm staring down the barrel of $200K+ in loans for a state school. Its a cruel joke that I was raised to work hard, pay my bills to make a better life for my family. Who knew that it would all work against me and I'd have to pay full ride. One could argue that I am also paying for several other kids through my tax dollars. You can point the finger in many directions. My advice is that we revamp the system and put some controls in place. One that limits how students can use funds so that the Octomoms of the world don't rack up $50K in loans to feed her family and call it student education loans. One that rewards students and colleges for outcomes. Few people out there realize that graduation rates in public univerisites are ridiculous. A community college in my state has a 4% graduation. What a horrible investment the tax payers are making! And we're all too stupid to know where our money is going. We have an antiquated system that needs to be fixed. Here's a radical idea: Why don't we do away with PELL and have a full student loan program that can be forgiven 50% if the student completes their education on time and another 50% when they become employed (a taxpayer like me)???

0

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting