Breaking News

Plans to tear down old Cole County jail and sheriff's house move forward April 16, 2014

Final Settlement With Facebook Approved

Facebook must obtain consumers' consent before sharing their information beyond established privacy settings

Following a public comment period, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has accepted as final a settlement with Facebook resolving charges that Facebook deceived consumers by telling them they could keep their information on Facebook private, and then repeatedly allowing it to be shared and made public. 

Marleen of Rotterdam,is among those unhappy with the way Facebook does things. “Facebook intentionally breached the privacy policy by involving improper and unauthorized collection, use, disclosure, retention and disposal of my personal information/account,” she said in a ConsumerAffairs post. “Therefore, I will press charges against Facebook. I am fed up and I will publicly warn people against the danger of an account on Facebook.”

The settlement requires the social media giant to take several steps to make sure it lives up to its promises in the future, including by giving consumers clear and prominent notice and obtaining their express consent before sharing their information beyond their privacy settings, by maintaining a comprehensive privacy program to protect consumers' information, and by obtaining biennial privacy audits from an independent third party. 

Split decision 

The Commission vote to approve the final order and letters to members of the public who commented on it was 3-1-1 with Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch dissenting and Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen not participating. 

A statement written by Chairman Jon D. Leibowitz and Commissioners Edith Ramirez and Julie Brill affirmed that -- based on the extensive investigation of the staff -- there is a strong reason to believe that the settlement is in the public interest, and that the Order's provisions make clear that Facebook will be liable for a broad range of deceptive conduct. 

As set forth in a separate statement, Commissioner Rosch dissented from the acceptance of the final consent order, questioning whether Facebook's express denial of liability provided "a reason to believe" that the settlement was "in the interest of the public" and expressing concern that the final consent order may not unequivocally cover all representations made in the Facebook environment. 

Story provided by ConsumerAffairs.
Consumer Affairs

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting

News Tribune - comments