Obama embraces health care law after court ruling
Monday, August 6, 2012
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama, emboldened by the Supreme Court's affirmation of his health care overhaul, is now embracing the law while campaigning for re-election, just as Republican rival Mitt Romney steps back from it.
Obama sees a second chance to sell voters on the issue despite deep skepticism about it from many people. Romney is avoiding answering hard questions about how he would tackle health care, and thus missing the chance to energize voters who oppose the law.
Democrats say the president always planned to stress health care if the court upheld the law. A month after the ruling, he and his team are focused on promoting individual parts of the law that have proved more popular than the sum. The campaign is targeting its efforts on important groups of voters, including women and Hispanics, who, Obama aides say, will benefit greatly once the law takes full effect.
Before the decision, Obama did mention the law in campaign events. But the case he made to voters was hardly vigorous, especially considering the amount of time he dedicated to overhaul during his first year in year in office.
The primary focus of his campaign speeches remains the economy, the race's dominant issue. But the Supreme Court's favorable ruling appears to have freed Obama to speak about the health law more passionately and emphatically than before the case was decided.
His campaign also is running a television advertisement in eight of the most contested states that criticizes Romney for opposing mandatory health insurance coverage for contraception; that provision is in Obama's overhaul. A health care-focused Spanish-language ad is running in Nevada, Colorado and Florida.
"The Supreme Court has spoken," Obama told a cheering crowd at a recent fundraiser in New Orleans. "We are going to implement this law."
During an event near Seattle, Obama said passing the law was "the right thing to do" and he highlighted specific parts of the overhaul that his campaign believes resonate well with voters.
"Young people will be able to stay on their parents' plans till they're 26 years old," Obama said. "Women won't be getting charged more than men, and you'll be getting free preventive care. Seniors will see the cost of their prescription drugs go down. If you don't have health insurance we're going to help you get it."
His campaign has been aggressive in selling the health overhaul to women.
During a speech to female bloggers Thursday, the president said he's "not going to give any ground to those who would deny women their own health care choices."
Romney, who declared the overhaul a "bad law" after the court ruled, has become less aggressive and less expansive in his discussion of health care.
At some recent events, Romney hasn't talked about the issue at all. On Friday, while campaigning in Las Vegas, he made one brief mention of "Obamacare", pledging to get rid of it and return health care "to a setting of personal responsibility."
Romney hasn't featured health care prominently in any television ads since the ruling June 28, but has made a few high-profile comments. The Republican was booed repeatedly during a July speech to the NAACP when he pledged to repeal the law if elected.
He "has and will continue to discuss the president's failures on health care," Romney spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg said, adding that the candidate "will deliver a new direction and will take action to repeal and replace Obamacare."
In a deadlocked race, Romney is hampered by his support for a health care measure similar to Obama's while he was Massachusetts governor. Also, Romney's calls for repeal raise complex questions about what he would do in place of the law; those are questions Romney has struggled to answer.
For Obama, there's a political risk in fully embracing his health care overhaul because the law remains unpopular with many.
An ABC News/Washington Post poll conducted in early July showed 47 percent of Americans supporting the law and 47 percent opposing it.
Yet the Obama campaign has been heartened by polls suggesting many people are ready to put the health care debate behind them.
For example, 56 percent of those questioned said they wanted to see the law's critics move on to other issues and stop their efforts to block the law from taking effect, according to a poll in early July by the Kaiser Family Foundation. Half of independent voters were among those who wanted to see lawmakers move on to other issues.
"Tens of millions of Americans are already reaping the benefits of health reform, and, now that the court has ruled, want to turn the page from the partisan fights of the last two years over its repeal," said Stephanie Cutter, Obama's deputy campaign manager.
The way Obama and Romney have approached health care following the Supreme Court ruling isn't necessarily trickling down to state and local elections. For some Democrats, particularly those in more moderate or conservative districts, supporting the president's health care overhaul remains a significant electoral liability. For some Republicans, especially those in the House, running to repeal the law can be a guaranteed way to energize supporters.
Associated Press writers Thomas Beaumont in Des Moines, Iowa and Steve Peoples in Washington contributed to this report.

Comments
RobHunterJohnson 9 months, 2 weeks ago
We need health care? If Mitts plan to dismantle what has taken so long to achieve came to be? Where would we all be in his picture. Rob
spelchek 9 months, 2 weeks ago
Be sure to remind us what happens if we don't pay for your new product Obama. Remind us all what the SCOTUS ruled constitutional for those (middle class) who don't pay for a product deems mandatory.
asb 9 months, 2 weeks ago
The only thing you're going to like from the AP about Obama is the report of his death. Why is that Grace? Why is a centerist president, locked down by a do-nothing congress and a greed and regulatory vacumn stifled economy the target of your bitter hatred? Why do you wish the USA to implode? Yes you do. You fortell it constantly, and usually with a FRightward glee. National Healthcare is one of many social programs that have been put in place over the last century to provide a decent life for the majority of Americans. Now, with the largest wealth transfer in history, you should be happy. It's not going to stop overnight, your heros will continue to rake in our money; Wall Street has defeated most attempts to bring it under control, the upper level tax load is proportionately the lowest its been in a half century; you should be happy. But instead you rail against a President as if he were the antichrist. Why Grace?
dokeus6 9 months, 2 weeks ago
"The US is going to implode due to policies that you approve of".
What Policies are you in all of your infinite wisdom implying will sink us Grace?
Policies that the government has had in place for 26 years before our POTUS even took office. What policies has he changed that are going to spell the doom of our country?
The ACA which will provide Health Care for people who currently do not want to buy it?
How about the Consolidation Authority Act where our POTUS was cutting some government size and eliminate some of the wasteful steps that it what was created to eliminate?
How come the Republican held House will not work with the POTUS to help create Jobs?
Answer that question!!
spelchek 9 months, 2 weeks ago
"How come the Republican held House will not work with the POTUS to help create Jobs?
Answer that question!! " --
I will. Your convenient amnesia keeps you from pointing out the super majority Mr. Obama enjoyed the first two years of his presidency. He could have passed anything he wanted, and did for that matter. And here we are at 8.3% unemployment. Instead of blaming people that had nothing to do with today's policies, why don't you start touting all the Democrat's that created all the successes we're enjoying today. All I hear from dem's is griping about the other guy rather than bragging about the current selections they've made. Why is Claire McCaskill and many other dems missing their convention this year? Answer that question!!
dokeus6 9 months, 2 weeks ago
I don't know why Claire is missing the convention. Maybe one reason is because she is campaigning. I have not personally asked her . You didn't answer my question at all Spel. You just gave me some BS answer like normal.
Here is a link to 50.
washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/march_april_2012/features/obamas_top_50_accomplishments035755.php/
want some more?
spelchek 9 months, 2 weeks ago
"centerist president" --bwaaaahaaaa!!!!!! centerist!! bwaaaaahaaaaa!!!!!! That's rich, thanks for the laugh. Keep 'em coming....
RobHunterJohnson 9 months, 2 weeks ago
Let it implode, The Tea party will still need Health Care. Rob
spelchek 9 months, 2 weeks ago
Perhaps another 3,000 additional pages of unread Obamacare and "yes" voted by Democrats is the solution?
Sequoia 9 months, 2 weeks ago
The "liberal media" is a lie. It's just a fallback when you've got nothing else.
theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/08/infographic-of-the-day-does-the-mainstream-media-have-a-conservative-bias/260772/
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting
Or login with:
OpenID