Your Opinion: Recreation building called a 'fiasco'
Friday, June 24, 2011
Regarding “Recreation building advances,” this is another example of too much government. Obviously Ballard-King and the Parks and Recreation committees would recommend to proceed. That enhances all of their self-interests.
Why spend any more money to compete with private recreational entities prior to finding a funding source and placing this need before the people who will use it and pay for it.
Discount the surveys. I suggest all taxpaying voters contact their City Council members and voice individual concerns and support or lack thereof.
Otherwise, this project will proceed just like the trash fiasco.
Let’s vote on it.
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting