Your Opinion: Recreation building called a 'fiasco'

Dear Editor:

Regarding “Recreation building advances,” this is another example of too much government. Obviously Ballard-King and the Parks and Recreation committees would recommend to proceed. That enhances all of their self-interests.

Why spend any more money to compete with private recreational entities prior to finding a funding source and placing this need before the people who will use it and pay for it.

Discount the surveys. I suggest all taxpaying voters contact their City Council members and voice individual concerns and support or lack thereof.

Otherwise, this project will proceed just like the trash fiasco.

Let’s vote on it.

Issue-oriented letters to the editor in response to this or about other local topics are welcome. All letters should be limited to 400 words. The author's name must appear with the letter, and the name, address and phone number provided for verification. Letters that cannot be verified by telephone will not be published. Send letters for publication to


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting

News Tribune - comments