Health care organization: Smokers need not apply

ST. LOUIS (AP) — A St. Louis-based health care organization will no longer hire smokers to work at any of its seven area hospitals, starting next month.

Job applicants at SSM Health Care will be asked if they have used tobacco in the last six months, and those who have will be eliminated from the hiring process, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported Friday.

“As an organization that provides health care, we want to encourage our employees to take better care of themselves and set good examples for our patients,” said Chris Sutton, an SSM spokesman.

Sutton said the new policy will save hospitals money because “healthier employees does mean lower health care costs.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that each smoker costs a company an additional $3,400 a year in health care costs and lost productivity.

All SSM facilities have been smoke-free since 2004. Current employees who smoke will not be bound by the policy when they’re off-duty.

The new policy applies only to SSM hospitals in Missouri. Nationwide, about 6,000 companies have stopped hiring smokers, according to National Workrights Institute, a New Jersey-based group dedicated to workers’ rights issues. The practice for certain employers, including health care providers, is allowed in Missouri.

SSM officials plan to lobber for similar legislation in Illinois, Wisconsin and Oklahoma, where they operate other hospitals.

Workers’ rights groups say the shift to a smoke-free work force could lead to similar crackdowns on legal yet unhealthy behaviors such as drinking alcohol and eating fast food. Some also are concerned that such anti-smoking policies punish lower-paid employees such as janitors and cafeteria workers who are addicted to nicotine.

“If enough of these companies adopt these policies and it really becomes difficult for smokers to find jobs, there are going to be consequences,” said Michael Siegel, a professor at Boston University School of Public Health. “Unemployment is also bad for health.”

Health care providers have led a recent trend away from employing smokers. The Cleveland Clinic stopped hiring smokers in 2007, and hospitals in Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Texas have recently done the same.

St. Francis Medical Center in Cape Girardeau also only hires nonsmokers.

“We felt it was unfair for employees who maintained healthy lifestyles to have to subsidize those who do not,” said Steve Bjelich, the hospital’s chief executive. “Essentially that’s what happens.”

———

Information from: St. Louis Post-Dispatch, http://www.stltoday.com

Comments

Graceful 1 year, 11 months ago

now this is real discrimination.

0

tonto 1 year, 11 months ago

It's completely legal, though, and based on a real health risk. Banks don't have to hire thieves, day care centers don't have to hire sex offenders, and health care organizations don't have to hire people with bad lifestyles. Another poster noted the morbidly obese employees at a local health care organziation. If that is actually the case (disabling obesity) what kind of care can those employees give patients?

0

MommaR 1 year, 11 months ago

thieves and sex offenders are felons...when did smoking become a felony?

0

tonto 1 year, 11 months ago

MommaR, Lots of thefts and sex offenses are misdemeanors rather than felonies. Tell me this: do the words "bad lifestyle" ring any bells? Employers don't have to hire people whose actions and beliefs contradict the organization's goals. A hospital is about healing and restoring life to people. Smoking doesn't fit in there; you know, like JCLifer said about hiring Baptists to run a Catholic church.

0

JCLifer 1 year, 11 months ago

And the Catholic Church doesn't have to hire Baptists either.

0

newone 1 year, 11 months ago

It's not disrimination if they treat every smoker the same!

0

newone 1 year, 11 months ago

but as long as they treat ALL smokers the same it is not considered discrimination.

0

linoge 1 year, 11 months ago

I don't blame them for wanting to employ nonsmokers only. Do you know how terrifying it is to be a patient in a healthcare facility and see that Doctors, Registered Nurses and LPNs are standing outside, next to the trash dumpster, smoking cigarettes? If they are unable to care for and make responsible choices for themselves, how the heck can they be relied on to care for their patients? Janitors and cafeteria workers who do not smoke become really annoyed when they have to perform extra-duty while their coworkers who "can't quit" are outside smoking (while on the payroll and drawing full wages). Let's make tobacco illegal: it has no medicinal value, no therapeutic value, it does not even have any measureable food value. The only constructive use that science has ever discovered for tobacco is to extract the nicotine for use as an insecticide. It kills on contact.

0

MommaR 1 year, 11 months ago

never happen...toooo many tax dollars

0

locotony 1 year, 11 months ago

So you want to make something illegal that is legal now, Do you drink alcohol, lets make it illegal as well, as a drunk driver or a drunk person in public is a heck of a lot worse than a person smoking. Oh wait that was tried once before during a time called prohibition and it didn't work then and won't work now. All making smoking illegal would do is create another criminal market and take tax revenue away that the state and federal governments need to function.

0

muleman 1 year, 11 months ago

I would rather see my doc or nurse smoking than with a cheek full of Redman

0

jeffcitygirl 1 year, 11 months ago

I would rather see them smoking than look at the morbidly obese employees I see at JCMG.

0

jcmom69 1 year, 11 months ago

If they were truly interested in the patients well being and their employees, shouldn't they put an end to all the fried food, greasy fries, and all other unhealthy food they sell in the cafeterias and give to the patients? Shouldn't they take out the vending machines with potato chips, candy, soda, coffee, etc? Not to mention the employees holiday parties that supply alcoholic beverages..Seems Discriminatory and hypocritical to me..

0

TheRickster 1 year, 11 months ago

Short and sweet,,smoking is pure and simply a drug addiction. Stop it now for it is on it's way out. Nasty,,stinky, and I don't know many folks that do smoke that haven't tried to quit.

0

wcywing 1 year, 11 months ago

Looks social engineering to me. What r they going to ban next? Make it wrong to eat at mcdonalds?

0

John 1 year, 11 months ago

I am a reformed, long term, 3 to 3 pack per day, smoker. I quit because it is stinky and troublesome, BUT, I wonder what the government will tax to make up for the HUGE shortfall in income when tobacco is finally outlawed and done away with (and it WILL happen).

0

John 1 year, 11 months ago

That should be "2 to 3 pack per day . . ."

0

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting