Hundreds protest Wis. plan to cut worker rights

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Hundreds of Wisconsin’s public employees clogged a hearing for hours and camped out in the state Capitol early Wednesday morning in a desperate attempt to delay action on Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s plan to strip away most of their collective bargaining rights.

The Legislature’s finance committee was preparing to vote on the measure, which would end collective bargaining for all state, county and local workers expect for police, firefighters and the state patrol. The move marks the boldest step by a new Republican governor and Legislature to solve budget problems by confronting organized labor.

Opponents seized on the finance committee’s public hearing on the bill on Tuesday to launch what Rep. Robin Vos, R-Rochester, called a “citizen filibuster” that tied up the hearing for hours. A vote by the committee would set up final votes in the state Senate and Assembly later this week.

Vos, the co-chair of the committee, finally ended the hearing at 3 a.m. Wednesday, 17 hours after it started. Democrats said they would continue to listen to workers who still wanted to speak. Republicans planned to reconvene later in the day to vote on the measure.

Two floors below the hearing, dozens of University of Wisconsin-Madison teaching assistants and students surged into the Capitol rotunda late Tuesday evening, putting down sleeping bags and blankets.

“I just think it’s really crappy,” said Alison Port, a 19-year-old freshman from Wauwatosa as she clutched her laptop and her Green Bay Packers blanket. “Let’s take all the rights away. If he starts here, where’s he going to stop? What else is he going to throw at us? It’s only going to get more extreme.”

Meanwhile, school officials in Madison announced Wednesday’s classes were canceled because 40 percent of the 2,600 members in the teacher bargaining unit had called in sick.

The theatrics notwithstanding, legislative leaders have said Walker has enough support in both the Senate and Assembly to approve the measure, which the governor said is necessary to address a projected $3.6 billion budget deficit.

“We’re broke and we don’t want to lay off almost 20,000 people,” said Senate President Mike Ellis, a Republican.

Union representatives were attempting to sway key moderates for a compromise but Democrats said the bill would be tough to stop. Democrats lost the governor’s office and control of the Legislature in the November midterm elections, leaving them powerless.

“The Legislature has pushed these employees off the cliff but the Republicans have decided to jump with them,” said Sen. Bob Jauch, one of 14 Democrats in the 33 member chamber.

New Republican governors and legislatures in other states have proposed cutting back on public employee costs to reduce budget shortfalls, but Wisconsin’s move appears to be the earliest and most extensive.

Wisconsin was the first state to enact a comprehensive collective bargaining law in 1959. The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the national union representing all non-federal public employees was founded in 1936 in Madison.

But the election of Walker, an outspoken conservative, last November and the GOP’s seizing of control of both legislative chambers set the stage for a dramatic reversal of Wisconsin’s strong labor history.

Walker’s plan would make workers pay half the costs of their pensions and at least 12.6 percent of their health care premiums. State employees’ costs would go up by an average of 8 percent. The changes would save the state $30 million by June 30 and $300 million over the next two years.

Unions could still represent workers, but could not seek pay increases above the Consumer Price Index unless approved by a public referendum. Unions also could not force employees to pay dues and would have to hold annual votes to stay organized. Local police, firefighters and state troopers would retain their collective bargaining rights.

In exchange for bearing more costs and losing leverage, public employees were promised no furloughs or layoffs. Walker has threatened to order layoffs of up to 6,000 state workers if the measure does not pass.

Wisconsin is one of about 30 states with collective bargaining laws covering state and local workers.

Walker has argued that the public employee concessions are modest considering what private sector workers have suffered during the recession.

But Democratic opponents and union leaders said Walker’s real motive was to strike back at political opponents who have supported Democrats over the years.

“So many people are against this,” UW-Madison senior Kylie Christianson said early Wednesday as she sat in the Capitol rotunda on her blanket, putting the finishing touches on a protest sign. “His job is to help us, not to hurt us.”

The public employee bill is the latest measure that Walker has pushed through the GOP-controlled Legislature since taking office in January. He’s also signed into law tax cuts for businesses that relocate to Wisconsin and those that create jobs as well as sweeping lawsuit reform. To achieve additional budget savings, he is seeking authority to make changes in the Medicaid program, sell state power plants and restructure existing debt to save about $165 million.

Governors in a number of other states, including Ohio, Indiana, Nevada and Tennessee, have called for forcing concessions from public employee unions but no similar measures have moved to final action.

———

Associated Press writer Todd Richmond contributed to this report.

Comments

online_editor 2 years, 4 months ago

Not to argue they're perfect every time, but in this case, hundreds showed up to protest, and the issue was whether or not the state should change its law to eliminate the employees' right to collective bargaining as had been established previously. Seems to me that the headline reflects that. If one relies totally on the headline to convey all the detail that the article elaborates on, I believe that's an unrealistic expectation of a headline's purpose. It can't possibly do that. It functions as a vehicle to quickly inform you of the general topic so you can decide whether or not you want to invest your time in learning the complete information in the article, or move on because the topic is of no interest to you. It's not intended to be an end unto itself. --Rick Brown, online editor, News Tribune

0

online_editor 2 years, 3 months ago

I think we'd have to change the semantics used by the majority of the people to be justified in doing that. Otherwise, we would be renaming a commonly used term. I've never heard of anyone calling them collective bargaining privileges. Fox News described it as stripping workers of collective bargaining rights.

0

online_editor 2 years, 3 months ago

Let me clarify. I don't believe Fox was supporting the keeping of collective bargaining when they phrased that that way. I think they simply were describing in brief language what the bill would do, just as the headline on this story. And I didn't mean to imply I believe collective bargaining is considered a "capital R" Right endowed by the Creator or U.S. Constitution, but rather, if you will, a "lower case" r right to set collective bargaining in motion as established by a law which can be repealed by the legislative process. If you want to argue that, semantically, we ought to reserve use of the word right to constitutional rights, then I understand and appreciate that point, but that's not currently a limitation practiced in common parlance.

0

pegassuss2525 2 years, 3 months ago

Actual the term Right (ie Worker's Rights), is used correctly. Grammatically and legaly.

0

pegassuss2525 2 years, 3 months ago

Ok, now we are all communist including the founding fathers who wrote the Constitution. Can't you just accept that the word is used correctly and stop inferring your doom and gloom agenda on anything or anyone who doesn't fall in with your train of thought.

0

rmsberengaria 2 years, 3 months ago

Yeah I never read anything in the Constitution about "Worker's Rights"?

0

pegassuss2525 2 years, 3 months ago

People's Rights was used in the Constitution. Is that Marxists? It was taken the same way you are taking Workers Rights. The word Rights is grammatically and legally correct. The founding fathers would be considered Marxists by using People's Rights by your definition.

0

pegassuss2525 2 years, 3 months ago

You just can't admit that the word Rights is used correctly. Don't dare tell me tha I don't understand history. The term worker's rights as it was used by Marx was co-opted from history. It's not new and special to Communisim. But again, this doesn't fit your idea of utopia so it needs to be demonized.

0

Stubs 2 years, 3 months ago

Ah, but there are too many people that do NOT read the articles and form there opinions on headlines only, and I believe the news writers know that and slant their headlines on purpose. What happened to honest journalism?

0

online_editor 2 years, 3 months ago

If I could be granted one wish as someone involved in the news business, it would be for everyone to read more, analyze more and discuss more. Skimming headlines or looking only at the front page, if that's all one routinely does, just isn't good enough to stay informed and be a participating citizen.

0

JCLifer 2 years, 4 months ago

Sounds like the liberal fantasyland in Madison is crumbling...

0

rmsberengaria 2 years, 3 months ago

It seems the news media, while reporting, and the Teachers and the teachers union that supports them along with "brother" unions have blown this way out of proportion to reality. Fact is Wisconsin voters overwhelmingly elected Scott Brown who ran on balancing the States budget he.... campaigned on it. The legislature of Wisconsin is Republican and they are there to do a job, that , Democrats failed to do. Basically the solution is pretty simple, State employees contribute 5.9% to their retirement and 12.6% to their health care premium. End collective bargaining, institute a true Merit system, end "step increases" system (Missouri has this). The alternative is 5500 lay-offs starting next week. Wisconsin employees are by some reports either the 10th or 11th highest paid State employee's in the nation. For all the hype these modest changes will balance the budget and avoid mass lay-offs, now and in the future. The main part is it ends the strangle hold on Teachers ability to teach and that only the best teachers do the teaching, not based on old arcane rules of senority and leaving bad teachers teaching. It seems Unions in many sectors while beneficial 50-100 years ago, 8 hour day, working conditions, minimum wage and so on. All of these safeguards that Unions helped workers attain back then are now codified into law today. Leaving Unions pushing for ever increasing pay and benefits as their main reason for being around. Many forget FDR forbid unionization of public sector workers in 1937 and this continued until 1962. According to "the Economist" Many public sector people have jobs for life and performance measures are rare. The result is a paradox: the typical public worker is better off than the people he is supposed to serve, and the gap has widened significantly over the past decade. In America, pay and benefits have grown twice as fast in the public sector as they have in the private sector. Or another example sighted by the "Buckeye Institute"...given by Mayer shows that one state worker hired in 2001 with a base salary of 30,014 per year received, in a nine-year period, 14 salary increases totaling $16,516, thanks to all the step and longevity increases.

0

rmsberengaria 2 years, 3 months ago

Public sector unions are already covered by Safety & Work rules through (big daddy) Government OSHA, EPA, FLRB, State and Federal Statutes. The Nanny State is going to take care of the HEALTH situation weather we like it or not! It boils down to 9 of the top 15 Largest donors to political campaigns (99% donations to Democrats), are Unions. What do unions need for these donations? DUES! DUES! its politics not about the worker.

0

rmsberengaria 2 years, 3 months ago

Eliminate Agencies? It just boils down to Laws are in place already. Just seems since union relevance is wanning in the private sector, as I mentioned before their goals are plain DUES used for political campaigns, its not about the worker anymore its the DUES to servive and line the pockets of Trumka and the Union Boss's. Hundreds of Millions of Dollars of Union members DUES used for Elections. It is not about eliminating anything unless you mean letting workers keep their money rather than having it taken against there will, in many cases, and given to the Union as (DUES).

0

rmsberengaria 2 years, 3 months ago

Well Teachers are supposed to be teaching, and in all honesty should be ashamed of themselves if they go back into the classroom and fail to apologize to the students.........that they received fake illness slips from Doctors. Yes, and why are all the Union, bussed in protestors not at work. Oh they are taking paid sick leave! We are also a Republic not a democracy. How about those legislators not doing their elected jobs and to think they are being paid for not working either. Hope the Governor does issue an executive order to stop any payment to them for being "TARDY"!

0

justaword 2 years, 3 months ago

Looking at Wisconsin, we can go back to the future. Corporations have reduced their costs by busting unions first, then wage-salary employees next. I forgot somewhere in this mix is the gutting of promised retiree pensions/health benefits. Right now, our corporations sit on a cash load of almost 2 trillion dollars! What workers, union and non-union, have given up won’t ever filter back down. The income of the average taxpayer in 1988 was 33,400. Ahead 20 years, it was 33,000. Workers are spinning their wheels, while giving up benefits. Walker’s Republicans are running Wisconsin like a corporate business, above. He set up a deliberate, contrived confrontation. Wisconsin’s nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau says this year’s legislature inherited a small surplus of 121.4 million. Now, Walker is claiming a deficit of 137 million. Where did the money go? New expenditures! 25 million for economic development fund, 48 million for PRIVATE health savings for the rich, 67 million to business in a tax shift plan. Let us not forget, Walker’s Republicans don’t want to bust the unions that supported them, however. The “crisis” sounds eerily familiar in the past corporate world. This year in Missouri, we will probably give our corporations a break on the franchise tax. “Balancing” the budget, we will cut education, services to the poor, employee benefits? Fast forward to the future on a national level. Like the corporations, like Wisconsin, there will be a crisis. Nationally, we have the resources to bail-out banking billionaires, making the stock market whole again while running up massive deficits. But when it comes time to pay the bill during our last lame duck congress, the rich, who benefited most, said, “No, not us.” Most, me included, don’t stand in the top 1 percent plus of tax payers making 380,000 up. The reactionary cry will be shared pain, but not pay. I stand with working men and women in Wisconsin and Missouri.

0

HorseGlue4u 2 years, 3 months ago

O.k., I say FIRE them ALL, and hire a gaggle of illegal aliens. They can work for minimum wage (be outta the sun), the State saves TONS of money, and we can send all of OUR illegals THERE!!!

0

Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting