KC super says he won’t retract resignation
Friday, August 26, 2011
KANSAS CITY (AP) — The possible departure of a popular Kansas City Schools superintendent has stirred concerns that the historically troubled district could fall back into a routine of uncertainty, one that has seen heavy turnover in the top leadership role for years.
A closed session that school board members called Thursday to discuss Superintendent John Covington’s resignation ended without them making a decision. Board president Airick Leonard West said they did not accept the resignation and planned to talk to Covington over the next several days to “explore whether there is another path forward.”
Covington later issued a written statement saying he wouldn’t retract his resignation and that continuing to talk about it “distracts the district from its primary focus, which is educating students.”
Meanwhile, Missouri Education Commissioner Chris Nicastro said she was “disappointed” by the turmoil and questioned whether the Kansas City district’s current plan for improvement could be in jeopardy.
Covington became superintendent in 2009. His efforts to transform the district have included a school-closing plan shutting down nearly half of the buildings to avoid bankruptcy. Along the way, he and board president West have clashed. And many think the key to keeping Covington is to get West to resign instead. In fact, a coalition of black political leaders and city council members has been working to convince the board president to leave, school board member Arthur Benson said.
“West and Covington are oil and water,” Benson said Thursday. “Covington isn’t going to consider coming back if West has anything to do with the school board, and I don’t blame Covington one bit.”
If Covington does indeed leave, state leaders said the district’s accreditation could be at risk and it could have a tough time finding a replacement for the superintendent’s job.
The district’s accreditation is currently under review, even as its performance has continued to fall below accreditation standards. Last week, a preliminary report showed the district meeting just three of 14 state standards, compared with four a year ago. The district currently is provisionally accredited.
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting