YOUR OPINION: Views on Proposition B
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Dear Editor: Opponents of Prop. B, the Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act, always rely on the same false claims, that it is an unnecessary law backed by so-called extremists.
The USDA's Office of Inspector General just issued a report, saying USDA kennel inspectors are guilty of witnessing horrible animal suffering at puppy mills, but not doing anything to stop that suffering, often because they feel constrained by weaknesses in current law.
The Better Business Bureaus of St. Louis, Springfield and Kansas City all combined on a report earlier this year saying the exact same thing happens in Missouri and that unless something changes, puppy mills will continue to abuse and neglect their dogs and sell the puppies to unsuspecting families. The Missouri state auditor has reported similar problems in multiple reports, since at least 2001.
Are the USDA, the BBB and the state auditor extremists? No, they are doing their job by telling us there is a big problem with cruel Missouri puppy mills, and Missouri's current laws and penalties are not strong enough to address the problem. In return, we should do our job by fixing that problem.
In November, we can do that by voting "yes" on Prop. B.
Issue-oriented letters to the editor in response to this or about other local topics are welcome. All letters should be limited to 400 words. The author's name must appear with the letter, and the name, address and phone number provided for verification. Letters that cannot be verified by telephone will not be published. Send letters for publication to email@example.com
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Please review our Policies and Procedures before registering or commenting