News Tribune
News Tribune
Central Missouri's information you need!
map
Sunday, July 05, 2009
Print this story | Email this story | Comment (No comments posted.) | Rate | - Text Size -

More people using Sober Driver program, but funding starting to run short

Bernie Fechtel, a long-time sponsor of the Sober Driver program, says more people are using the program and that public assistance might be needed to keep it funded. (Julie Smith/News Tribune)

By Kris Hilgedick
News Tribune
Published: Monday, December 15, 2008 2:56 PM CST
As a long-time supporter of Jefferson City's Sober Driver program, Bernie Fechtel said the organization is looking for a little financial help right now.

The program, which covers the cost of taxi rides for area residents who've been drinking and know they shouldn't drive, needs funding help for one simple reason.

“More people are calling for rides,” Fechtel said.

More than 1,500 people cashed in tickets in 2006; a year later, the number rose to 2,162.

And preliminary 2008 numbers show plenty of people plan to call for a sober taxi driver this year as well.

“The problem is, the program has grown so much,” said Fechtel. “But until now, it's always had enough money.”


When the program first started in the 1980s it ran from Thanksgiving to New Years Day.

When he got involved about nine years ago, Fechtel - the latest family member to run Fechtel Beverage and Sales Inc., a local beer distributorship - thought it would be a good program to provide all year.

“It's always struck me, it's as important to save a life in May as in December,” he said last week while going over the program's numbers with Jefferson City police Capt. Doug Shoemaker.

Fechtel hasn't been involved with the Sober Driver program - which originally was called Sober Chauffeur - since its inception. But he has spent a good amount of time keeping it going in recent years.

“It's part of the responsibility we take on when we sell a regulated product,” he said.

And he thinks having the program in town reduces the cost of insurance for small business owners.

The program is funded by grants. Originally, Miller Brewing Company provided assistance; when that source went by the wayside, Heineken USA stepped in with a program to help small communities. (Both beers are distributed by Fechtel).

Fechtel is confident the community will receive another grant from Heineken USA. But he's not sure it's enough the cover the program's expenses.

“The taxi company has been great. But if we want to keep it up, we're going to have to look to the community for help,” said Fechtel.



pencil ad
  Next
  Man gets life, plus 60 years for killing Jefferson City teen

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:


Before commenting read the News Tribune Forum's policies and procedures.
Thanks.

nospinzone wrote on Dec 24, 2008 3:43 PM:

" Great program most that use it , just use it in holiday season because of the office gatherings, lets not slam something that has great intentions . If they run out of money then just let the public know that their sober chauffer -ing is back on their shoulders again "

ndnlvngcherokee wrote on Dec 24, 2008 12:18 PM:

" Just my 2 cents but lets think if when going out you are going to drink why not get someone in your group to be the one not to drink so they can drive...or did everyone forget that practice. So many are talking down on this program would you say the samething if one of these drunks (even if it is for that 1party a year) hit your wife, husband, child, parents, family or friend and kills them...I think the program is great and they are asking for nothing more than donations...hmmm what were we arguing about? "

wow wrote on Dec 21, 2008 7:55 PM:

" Boscoe, I think you are right. The service is for people who attend Bars, Night Clubs and such. Although JC has a very limited night club scene, this service is beneficial to the few people who choose to have a few drinks and a bootie shake:) So make the people who use it pay. The Club owner's and ride user's should foot the bill for this program. Hey it's better to pay this way than to get caught by the "do right crew", because once that happens, the ride and lodging is free. It's this simple, if ya drive don't drink, if ya drink don't drive. Stay safe.....2009 is gonna be fine. "

boscoe wrote on Dec 20, 2008 1:32 PM:

" Doesn't the program mainly provide transportation home from the bars, not private residences? If it is mainly providing transportation for people who are customers of bars, then the bar owners or drinks sold at bars should be taxed. Why should everyone indirectly subsidized the bar business and people who go to bars? "

wow wrote on Dec 19, 2008 9:31 PM:

" I understand the actual ride home is free, but it doesn't change my opinion that the people who use this service should help foot the bill. There are many ways to raise the money, but the easiest may be to have higher prices/taxes on the booze or the establishments that sell the juice. Use the extra revenue to fund a safe ride home program year round. Ya cannot get something worth while for nothing and this Sober Driver deal is no different. You either help fund the program, walk home after a few drinks, or take the chance you won't get caught. The choice is yours...either way, put your big people pants on and Adult-UP! "

rojo wrote on Dec 18, 2008 4:08 PM:

" Bernie Fechtel is one of those rare people who believe in giving back to their community. "

boscoe wrote on Dec 18, 2008 11:48 AM:

" Are there any bars in Holts Summit? "

Downtowner2 wrote on Dec 18, 2008 11:22 AM:

" boscoe,

I hang out in holt summit often. See you on the road :) "

TheRickster wrote on Dec 17, 2008 9:34 PM:

" The city people have such easy choices. A cab, sober ride, or walk. It is the reason they put the road block usually on the bridge. No way around it.
I have seen the program abused with certain people getting them regularly.Drink up the cab money, tuff doo doo. "

boscoe wrote on Dec 17, 2008 8:53 PM:

" Anyone remember the tiny little drive-up lliqor store they used to have on Misery Blvd between Eagles Lodge and Ewers Tires? The place that used to be a Hamburger Hut or something like that? We used to love to drive through and get some Budweiser without even getting out of the car! "

boscoe wrote on Dec 17, 2008 8:50 PM:

" Downtowner, i don't care what you do, just don't make me pay for your screwups.

Oh, and driving a minivan is cool. I'll bet you pick up a lot of chicks driving that beast, especially if it is full of cigarette smoke and has puke running down the sides of the doors.

As for your puking, maybe when you grow up you'll be able to hold your liquor. Try staying away from the fuzzy navels and cherry vodka and just drink single-malt scotch like a real man. "

naturally wrote on Dec 17, 2008 3:41 PM:

" no downer, I believe the remark was aimed at you. :) "

downtowner2 wrote on Dec 17, 2008 2:59 PM:

" Boscoe with regard to your previous post, I hope you are referring to unwed mothers and welfare recipients, not the two aforementioned. "

downtowner2 wrote on Dec 17, 2008 2:38 PM:

" Although I did not make that statement, I will take the credit. As for the rest of you I will see you on this winter on the icey highways of central Missouri hammered drunk. My suggestion to you is get out of the way! This mini van yields to no one. Vaya Con Dios! "

boscoe wrote on Dec 17, 2008 2:09 PM:

" Agree with Downtowner there. Make the bars pay for the program with their annual busines liccense fee. If you don't like paying a little more for your drinks, then don't go to the bar. Simple as that.

Smokers, drinkers, unwed mothers, welfare recipients, etc. all want everyone else to pay for their own mistakes. Take care of your own or else suffer the consequences. I'm sick of paying for all these idiots. "

downtowner2 wrote on Dec 17, 2008 12:16 PM:

" #1 Bar in JC, Spectators. Why? Because they have to go cups. They actually encourage their partrons to drink and drive! Gotta love J town! "

downtowner2 wrote on Dec 17, 2008 11:35 AM:

" If you can't handle your booze and don't want to pay for a cab, stay off the road. If you can or can't and like to live on the edge, then let the games begin. Nothing's better than picking up a twelver and doing doughnuts in your old grade school parking lot. Amatures need not apply! "

naturally wrote on Dec 17, 2008 8:37 AM:

" downertowner2 - that would not be 'man up' in your case. Regardless of your gender.
defineition - to "be a man about it"; to do the things a good man is traditionally expected to do, such as: taking responsibility for the consequences of one's actions; displaying bravery or toughness in the face of adversity; providing for one's family, etc "

Downtowner2 wrote on Dec 17, 2008 7:47 AM:

" How about people just man up and run the guantlet. They can't catch all of us! "

shinymcshine wrote on Dec 16, 2008 7:10 PM:

" making a condition of his probation a mandate he pay a "premium" to the sober chauffuer program makes perfect sense and could easily be done. Probation is the Cole County way. Drunks will agree to a lot of things to avoid spending time in jail. Funding the program from those that offend is poetic justice. "

shinymcshine wrote on Dec 16, 2008 7:07 PM:

" The point is, people are going to be irresponsible with or without this option. Undoubtedly, this will curb a percentage of offenders; not all, but some and that has to be seen as a victory.
I just think if a drunk driver is given the option of a free ride and he thumbs his nose at it, if he gets arrested, they should make an example of his blatant disregard for his fellow man.
Charging a fee to the drunk would kill it. That already exists. They call it a TAXI.
This has to be free for it to work IMO.
Now the only question is how to pay for it. "

tholt wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:43 PM:

" Why not charge a flat fee of $5 for using the program? That's probably one drink at most of the bars and if you're with 3-4 friends, what's a couple bucks to get a safe ride home? "

naturally wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:19 PM:

" I only drink half a beer Shiney. :) .........sometimes half a beer all night long. (just not the same half) "

lovemyboys wrote on Dec 16, 2008 1:47 PM:

" Rep Bill Deeken has been trying to get a liquor tax increase of just $.02 per drink/can, whatever. But, because Anheueser-Busch has such a strong lobby, it never made it to the Senate floor.

The amount of increase was to help fund programs such as these and AA, etc. People are not going to stop drinking unless they want to, but if we can prevent them from driving and hurting someone innocent, then I say go for it! "

truthseeker wrote on Dec 16, 2008 12:42 PM:

" casion, I dont know....but should my car insurance be higher when I try to be a responsible driver ? I am because there are those who dont carry the insurance that they are required to or who drive recklessly and irresponsibly and have lots of claims, both of which makes everyone else pay higher premiums. No it shouldnt, but it is because I have to have car insurance. That is only one area of our lives that we are penalized for the irresponsiblity of others. So then I guess the answer to your question would be yes, even though it isnt fair. Just like our having to pay higher insurance costs isnt fair. But then who says life would be fair? "

msindependent wrote on Dec 16, 2008 12:22 PM:

" Cab drivers get the short end of this one, losing business so the drunk can spend more at the bar.

The program would appear to favor bar owners and the sale of their liquor.

Let the bar owners who choose to participate in the program, and profit kick in a nice percentage for it, say 50%, they can choose to pass the cost or .....ahem....absorbe it. "

aswell wrote on Dec 16, 2008 12:09 PM:

" Just pay ,If you have cash for a drink you can pay for a ride I have found people of Jefferson city of being cheep, oh you take out a loan but can pay it back like many of my customers I find them in a bar have money for drinks but not for a cab, I give them a ride and twist the cash out for the ride.Just like cheaters revenge. "

casionman wrote on Dec 16, 2008 11:59 AM:

" Truth Seeker. What about the responsible drinkers? Should I pay more for a drink even though I drink responsibly? The truth is alcholics are alcoholic, killers are killers, and thiefs are theifs. There are no deterents in existence that can make them stop. Just enforce the current laws and make their lives difficult and miserable. "

truthseeker wrote on Dec 16, 2008 11:46 AM:

" I agree that is sounds like it promotes irresponsible drinking. Still the program needs to be there to keep them off the road. But I still dont understand why it is always our responsibility(more taxes, being asked to contribute, whatever) to be responsible for those who choose not to be responsible. WHY shouldnt they and the people who are serving, selling and over drinking be responsible to help FOOT this program? If the bar owners are charged a fee and it is passed on to the customers they serve so be it. Maybe they wont be able to afford those extra drinks that will put them over. The same way some smokers either quit smoking or dont smoke as much since taxes increased. "

truthseeker wrote on Dec 16, 2008 11:41 AM:

" I understand what everyone is saying. I stated it is a program that needs to stay in place. My questions are this, are people being enabled by not having to take more responsibility to get help for their drinking problems? If it is a once or twice a year person had too much to drink that is one thing. If it is something someone makes a habit of doing a lot then they have a problem. You state they should be commended for using this program, I wont disagree but are they using because THEY are actually still able to make that responsible decision to call or is someone making them take the cab ride. "

casionman wrote on Dec 16, 2008 11:33 AM:

" It sounds like the program promotes irresponsible drinking. "

casionman wrote on Dec 16, 2008 11:32 AM:

" It sounds like program promotes irresponsible drinking. "

yds0115 wrote on Dec 16, 2008 8:23 AM:

" I agree Parrothead, the problem drinkers should be commended for using this service. I personally wish this program was available in the 70's, maybe my father wouldn't be disabled today from a drunk driver.
What about a collection jar at the establishments for donations, like a tip jar type system. The alcohol distributors can collect when they deliver and forward to the appropriate entity...just a quick thought. "

Parrothead911 wrote on Dec 16, 2008 1:15 AM:

" The "problem drinkers" should not be charged for this service. They should be commended for not getting behind the wheel and endangering us or our loved ones. I like the earlier stated ideas of adding a surcharge to DWI fines.

If barowners are to be obliged to help with charges, it is likely that the cost would be passed on to the customers, i.e. drinkers. This idea would not cover intoxicated people going from one private residence to another (similar programs elsewhere also make house-to-house runs)

Perhaps the medical community should be getting involved with funding. too. Undoubtedly their ERs are certainly being kept free for other patients without the danger of additional drunks on the road. "

mccrabb wrote on Dec 15, 2008 11:11 PM:

" I'm not blaming anybody or any laws I for one would take a cab why take a chance,its a wonderful service to bad the city cant do like the metro areas and transport the auto also. "

shinymcshine wrote on Dec 15, 2008 10:41 PM:

" mccrabb
In reality, you have to actually drink pretty hard to get to .08%. Making statements that one drink will put you there merely shows you have no idea what you're talking about.
When someone tells you "I got a DWI and only had two beers" (the standard amount claimed, btw), the only thing you know for certain is that person will lie to you.
But we all know, its a heck of lot more convenient to blame the laws, the cops, your x-wife, Bigfoot, or the ghost of Elvis, (etc) for personal failures. God forbid people actually take resonsibility for their actions. "

mccrabb wrote on Dec 15, 2008 10:17 PM:

" Well like most states lets take example they will charge you with DUI instead of DWI and what about the people who have CDLs do you know what the BAC is for that .04 ,responsible people use the cab system.And don't believe all you look up, even I don't guarantee 100% go take a chance. "

hasher28 wrote on Dec 15, 2008 10:08 PM:

" mccrabb, you are incorrect. A quick check at an alcohol blood level website revealed that a 160 pound person with 4 regular beers in 2 hours was under the legal limit. However, their impairment would probably have a negative effect on their driving ability. Also, most states, if not all, have 0.08 blood alcohol as the legal limit. "

mccrabb wrote on Dec 15, 2008 9:10 PM:

" So with .08 most people are over the limit at one drink , this city does not need throw rocks , lets just bring back prohibition old fashion town , Ive said this town is great to grow up in to 18 leave to the real world then come back and retire and die. "

truthseeker wrote on Dec 15, 2008 6:50 PM:

" How about making the local bar owners who allow people to reach this state of intoxication be required to pay a certain amount each time someone is picked up at their establishment? They might be more careful about allowing people who have already had too much to drink to be served more.(yes I know they can always go to another bar when denied at one)Many of these people are the same people over and over so the bar owners are aware of the overindulgence of many of their customers. Make the bars and those who require the service more accountable instead of relying on the communitycitizens( many who do not drink or dont over indulge at least)to be responsible for paying for this. "

truthseeker wrote on Dec 15, 2008 6:35 PM:

" Obviously the problem with people drinking so much that they are unable to safely drive is never going to change(especially in this area)regretfully, so I have to say this is a program that needs to have funding. Some good ideas have been presented but I am sure most would violate the rights of those who DWI somehow.
Hasher, your post does beg a question after reading it and thinking about it. At some point in time does not this program become a sort of enabler to the problem if someone indeed has to continue to use it? "

hasher28 wrote on Dec 15, 2008 4:15 PM:

" If someone uses the program "x" number of times they should be required to get some counselling. Why not contact users of the program and ask for a donation or charge a fee to be collected at a later date. "

shinymcshine wrote on Dec 15, 2008 4:04 PM:

" How about adding a $100 premium to DWI arrests over the holiday period. There is NO excuse for driving drunk when this program is in place. Those that choose to thumb their nose at their fellow citizen's safety should be hit harder. Do it year round and the program pays for itself.
Drunks paying to keep drunks off the street. What's wrong with that picture? "

boscoe wrote on Dec 15, 2008 3:52 PM:

" How about putting a extra 5% tax on alcoholic beverage sales to b e used to fund Sober Chauffer and other alcohol abuse programs?

I'm glad to see that a liquor distributor is onboard with trying to raise money for these good programs. Maybe he shoud start the tax increase initiative to put it on a statewide ballot. "


To add your comments you must be registered and logged in

*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
*Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

Return to: News Local « | Home « | Top of Page ^


-

Sports Poll
Online Poll

Will the resignation of Sarah Palin as Alaska's governor negatively impact her viability as a potential Republican nominee for President in 2012? (Read story here)
Yes, definitely
No, definitely not
Perhaps, but not necessarily
Don't know yet
View Results

Related Stories


Local Headlines


Top Commented Stories (more)


Top Commented Stories (more)


Sports Headlines


 All Contents Copyright © 2009 News Tribune Co. All rights reserved.
 AP stories Copyright © 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Click for copyright details.
 Comments or questions? Contact us.
 Employees

 


rss Available Feeds
rss iconRSS Political News
rss iconRSS Press Releases
rss iconRSS Local News
rss iconRSS State News
rss iconRSS Business
rss iconRSS Sports
rss iconRSS Entertainment
About RSS Feeds

 


Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.
Copyright © 2009. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.