News Tribune
News Tribune
Central Missouri's information you need!
map
Sunday, July 05, 2009
Print this story | Email this story | Comment (No comments posted.) | Rate | - Text Size -

Judge grants partial injunction in Halloween case

By JIM SALTER
Associated Press Writer
Published: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:04 AM CDT
ST. LOUIS (AP) - A federal judge ruled Monday that parts of Missouri's new law restricting registered sex offenders' actions on Halloween night are unenforceable, saying the law lacked clarity and could cause confusion for sex offenders and those charged with enforcing the law.

U.S. District Judge Carol Jackson granted a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of some parts of the law after hearing arguments in a case brought by four sex offenders.

Attorney General Jay Nixon's spokesman, Scott Holste, said the office was not prepared to discuss the ramifications of the order but would appeal quickly.

The law approved by the Legislature in May and signed by Gov. Matt Blunt in June requires that sex offenders avoid all Halloween-related contact with children from 5 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on Oct. 31. It requires them to remain inside their homes with the outside lights off, and to post a sign saying they have no candy.

A violation is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail.

Attorney Chris Quinn, arguing for the state, said the law is aimed at protecting children on a night when many visit strangers' homes, sometimes without their parents.


“Sex offenders pose a risk of reoffending that's higher than anyone else,” he said during the four-hour hearing.

Jackson found no fault with the provision requiring sex offenders to keep their outdoor lights off. She also agreed there was no lack of clarity in the requirement for a sign that reads, “No candy or treats at this residence.”

But other aspects of the statute were too broad and raise questions, the judge said.

For example, Jackson said, may a sex offender have contact with his or her own children on Halloween? Passing out candy is clearly prohibited, but what else constitutes “Halloween-related activity?” And if a sex offender planned to be out of town on Halloween, he or she would not technically be “inside the home” as the law requires, Jackson said.

The law also allows sex offenders to leave home on Halloween night if there is “just cause” such as work or an emergency, but Jackson criticized the measure for failing to define “just cause” more clearly.

Such vagueness would cause confusion among sex offenders, police and prosecutors, Jackson said.

She cited a letter sent out by the Cape Girardeau County Sheriff's Department to registered sex offenders in that southeast Missouri county. She said the letter's reference to the “Halloween season” could have police trying to enforce the law on days other than Oct. 31 - clearly not the law's intent, she added.

The injunction stemmed from a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri. Attorney Dave Nelson called the requirements of the law a “scarlet letter” for sex offenders. He said the law also results in additional punishment by requiring what amounts to “house arrest” one day each year.

Anthony Rothert, the legal director of the ACLU of Eastern Missouri, said the judge did not limit her order to just the four plaintiffs in the case.

In practical terms, the judge's order appears to mean that registered sex offenders in Missouri do still have to turn off their porch light and post a sign saying they don't have candy on Halloween night, he said.

But as he understands it, the judge's order means registered sex offenders in Pike, Cape Girardeau and St. Louis counties where the plaintiffs live, can spend time with their children on Halloween and do not have to stay inside their homes.

Rothert suggested registered sex offenders statewide check with their county sheriff's department to see how they plan on enforcing the law. Rothert said the judge's order only applies to this Halloween, but he added the ACLU will continue working to get the entire statute off the books.

---

Associated Press writer Betsy Taylor in St. Louis contributed to this report.



pencil ad
Previous   Next
Ex-deputy pleads guilty to using excessive force   Hundreds hear Brockovich talk on tumor scare

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:


Before commenting read the News Tribune Forum's policies and procedures.
Thanks.

Mac1974 wrote on Oct 30, 2008 4:50 PM:

" Shiny said, "It makes a great headline that a politician "cracked down" on sex offenders by creating yet another get-tough-on-crime law, but realistically, its pretty far reaching and doesn't really do much. "

And shiny is right. At some point in the future, you'll hear a politician say, "And I was the one who protected the children on Halloween from the predators," even though there is probably no evidence to prove Halloween is more dangerous than any other night when it comes to predators preying on children. While I agree with almost everything lumps has said, I really do think this is just a ploy by some politician to make a name for himself/herself. I will be worried about real-threats-to-my-children's-safety-on-Halloween,-like-drunk-drivers. "

shinymcshine wrote on Oct 30, 2008 3:17 PM:

" apostacy wrote on Oct 30, 2008 8:23 AM:
Seems you lump everyone into one category.

That's the main problem with the law. It llumps everyone together. Not all people convicted of sex crimes are what you'd generally consider sexual predators.
It makes a great headline that a politician "cracked down" on sex offenders by creating yet another get-tough-on-crime law, but realistically, its pretty far reaching and doesn't really do much. "

oriley wrote on Oct 30, 2008 10:01 AM:

" lumpsinthesandbox I agree with you. That guy was 22 and she was 16. Maybe it was agreed by both parties to be intimate, however, the law is the law. She was a minor, at 22 he knew better. And maybe he should have thought about his life and how it would be effected before his own selfish perverse satisifaction. That is the way I see it. You know the law and chose NOT to follow it, therefore, breaking it. So don't cry when you get caught and have to pay the price for what you did. SO RIDICULOUS! "

oriley wrote on Oct 30, 2008 9:52 AM:

" My opinion is this: They made a choice to be a sex offender now deal with the consequences. You are punished for your crime. Frankly, I don't want my children anywhere near you because you are deemed a pervert. I am sure you weren't whining when you committed the crime, no one wants to hear you cry now about being punished. DEAL WITH THE CHOICE YOU MADE! "

online_editor wrote on Oct 30, 2008 9:43 AM:

" it's understandably an emotional issue, but please keep the personal jabs out of it and stick to issues. Also, if you've made your point a couple times and clarified it, it's likely that you've successfully communicated your ideas to most readers and it's doubtful you'll be more persuasive by monopolizing the blog with further sparring. Thanks. --Rick Brown, online editor, News Tribune "

apostacy wrote on Oct 30, 2008 8:23 AM:

" lumpsinthesandbox. I guess the Gates of Heaven shall open up for people who do judge people. If that is the case then Paul - who wrote 2/3's of the New Testament is where? Not all people convicted are bad people. Look at the history of our nation. How many people make mistakes, repent, and change. Is that what our country stands for? Seems you lump everyone into one category. Should we not have laws not allowing drunk drivers to drive? How about the drug dealers who destroy lives and families? Should murders be allowed to breathe? Shoule liars be allowed to speak? Should people who have committed adultery be allowed to marry? "

lumpsinthesandbox wrote on Oct 29, 2008 10:27 PM:

" The most sickening of his posts:
apostacy wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:43 AM:
"I know a man who has suffered enough, and move on with his life."

He is not speaking of a victim - but a predator. "

lumpsinthesandbox wrote on Oct 29, 2008 10:23 PM:

" Heres the orginal story: newstribune.com/articles/2008/10/09/news_state/083state30halloween.txt

apostacy wrote on Oct 10, 2008 9:14 AM:
" Judge not.... For you shall be judged! How many perfect people do you you know? Are you perfect? Have you committed a crime? Love has no boundaries. Does not Jesus teach us that? He who is without Sin cast the first stone... Do you "lumpinthesandbox" cast the first stone? Everyone has the right to be happy, and enjoy the fruits of a new beginning. "

I would love to throw a rock at you - several large boulders, in fact. "

lumpsinthesandbox wrote on Oct 29, 2008 10:17 PM:

" I am furious about this. I have children and I am going to do everything I can to make sure they are safe.

Sexual Predators prey not only on the childs body, but their emotions as well. So many predators get by with it, preying on mulitiple victims, for years; because they terrify the child into silence and shame.

It's not simply a crime. Predators have a streak of evil in them that we can fathom, they see a innocent child as a sexual toy.

Don't quote statistics, or biblical passages, apostacy. I hope the editor looks up your registration and IP address and passes the info on the to local law enforcement. "

lumpsinthesandbox wrote on Oct 29, 2008 10:08 PM:

" Jesus said: ""Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not; for of such is the kingdom of heaven."

Jesus also said: "Who so shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned int the depth of the sea. (Matt. 18:6)

Not everyone who sayeth unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven. (Matt. 7:21).

I am all for executing sexual offenders who prey on children. First time offense. Drowning them works for me, too.

apostacy - you make me sick. "

lumpsinthesandbox wrote on Oct 29, 2008 10:00 PM:

" Sexual Predators can not be compared to coomon crimminals. Do you know what happens when a sexual predator is placed in the general population of a prison?
You can bet that I watch my children - like a hawk. I have to, because of sick, twisted, perverts like this.
You can spend your life wailing and gnashing your teeth, researching statistics, all while waiting for the rapture. I say again, good luck with that.

Want to play name that quote, again? Try these on for size. "

lumpsinthesandbox wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:47 PM:

" Comments posted by apostacy offend and sicken me. Last time he was on here posting about this same issue, he spouted christian love, forgiveness, and waiting for the rapture.
Try looking into the tortured eyes of a child who was sexually molested and quote statistics.
If apostacy was this twenty-two year old MAN who had sex with a sixteen-year old GIRL - he got what he deserves. There is a huge difference in maturity in the age span. A man of that age would be sexually preying on a young girl who was not emotionally mature enough to realize this. "

apostacy wrote on Oct 29, 2008 1:36 PM:

" I think I would be worried about the statistics. However, politicians seemed to want everyone to make a "Knee Jerk" reaction to their made up statistics. I agree that their are bad people in this world, but I would rather make that decision for myself; rather than the media and politicians. You can read the comment from the attorney general's office; seems they don't even look at the statistics. I thought attorneys were responsible for telling the court the facts. They must not have the internet at Jay Nixon's office. "

Boscoe wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:25 AM:

" This makes me mad. "

apostacy wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:24 AM:

" 7:45 pm October 27th, 2008

ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/rsorp94pr

Highlights include the following:

* Released prisoners with the highest rearrest rates were robbers (70.2%), burglars (74.0%),
larcenists (74.6%),
motor vehicle thieves (78.8%),
those in prison for possessing or selling stolen pr7:45 pm October 27th, 2008

.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/rsorp94pr.htm

Highlights include the following:

* Released prisoners with the highest rearrest rates were robbers (70.2%), burglars (74.0%),
larcenists (74.6%),
motor vehicle thieves (78.8%),
those in prison for possessing or selling stolen property (77.4%),
and those in prison for possessing, using, or selling illegal weapons (70.2%).

*weapons "

apostacy wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:11 AM:

" Boscoe here is some information for you:
7:45 pm October 27th, 2008

.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/rsorp94pr.htm

Highlights include the following:

* Released prisoners with the highest rearrest rates were robbers (70.2%), burglars (74.0%),
larcenists (74.6%),
motor vehicle thieves (78.8%),
those in prison for possessing or selling stolen property (77.4%),
and those in prison for possessing, using, or selling illegal weapons (70.2%).

* Within 3 years, 2.5% of released rapists were arrested for another rape,

and 1.2% of those who had served time for homicide were arrested for homicide.
* The 272,111 offenders discharged in 1994 had accumulated 4.1 million arrest charges "

apostacy wrote on Oct 29, 2008 8:52 AM:

" Boscoe: Look up the statistics for yourself. I was curious until I started to do the same. Considering, I met and became friends with someone who was 22 and had a relationship with a 16 year old. He is now married with children, but has to change his life everytime some politician wants to feed the public garbage for a vote. I even contacted the sheriffs office, and out of 2500 registered sex offenders only 1 had been convicted of another crime. That opened my eyes. I think we need to not judge until we know the person. There are a lot of people never caught or convicted of crimes. And anyone that disagrees is more dangerous. "

Boscoe wrote on Oct 28, 2008 9:43 PM:

" So if only 3.5% of sexual offenders re-offend, then why do we need more laws like the Halloween laws?

Why do folks make such a big deal out of a measly 3.5% of re-offenders who probably won't follow any additional laws anyway? "

apostacy wrote on Oct 28, 2008 8:10 PM:

" Boscoe do you have the statistics to back what you are saying. I have done the research. 3.5% reoffend. I am talking about the majority. These laws do nothing but waste money. If someone is going to do something no law stops them, and these laws sure do nothing. Parents need to be parents, and focus more one that. I choose not to live in fear. If 1 out of three girls are victimized - which means there are a lot of people not punished. Scary statistic. Maybe we should all stay at home. "

Boscoe wrote on Oct 28, 2008 4:22 PM:

" Offenders keep repeating their crimes.
Children keep getting molested.
Lawyers argue over the wording of the laws.

Nothing changes. "

Boscoe wrote on Oct 28, 2008 4:20 PM:

" Too bad we just can't have a law "do not sexually offend children" and be done with it. Now we have to add all these other laws to help support the original intent to keep people from sexually offending children.

This is the problem with our legal system. The basic laws are not enforced or punished, so we have to set up other laws to help support the basic laws. Then, when it is all said and done, repeat offenders just get a year or two of probation if anything and they are out there in the public doing it again. "

apostacy wrote on Oct 28, 2008 1:36 PM:

" I think if we want to protect our children and families; then I am for not allowing anyone with a DWI conviction should not be allowed to drive on the weekends and holidays. How many children and families are destroyed by drunk drivers? And how about not allowing anyone with a felony conviction to enter any government building, and educational institutions - which would mean any schools. The problem would be that the Missouri Assembly would cease to exist, and God forbid them passing a law to their own detriment. I am all in favor of classifying society. Especially when everyone is completely mislead and live in fear. We all need to look at ourselves first. "

apostacy wrote on Oct 28, 2008 1:27 PM:

" I would like to comment on this. I have followed these issues, and my only question is: How many of you do any research on an issue like this? Can you state the statistics, and does one size fit all? How many people are labeled for having sex, while in high school, or early twenties with a teenager? Should they be labeled too? How about looking up in U.S. Bureau of Justice and their statistics. My last question is can you name one time a child was victimized on Halloween? Seems status quo has worked for many years. What responsible parent would let their children go out unattended? It starts with our responsibilities as parents. "

aswell wrote on Oct 28, 2008 12:58 PM:

" Tell that to the catholic church. "

MJBMPGP99 wrote on Oct 28, 2008 10:20 AM:

" Maybe these men and women should not have victimized children, etc. and they would have nothing to worry about. Protecting our children should be every law makers first priority. An "over concerned" sex offender would have me worried because they groom their victims and what a more perfect time, when you have numerous innocent children knocking on your door all night long! I agree with the law and think it should be enforced. "


To add your comments you must be registered and logged in

*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
*Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

Return to: News State « | Home « | Top of Page ^


-

Sports Poll
Online Poll

Will the resignation of Sarah Palin as Alaska's governor negatively impact her viability as a potential Republican nominee for President in 2012? (Read story here)
Yes, definitely
No, definitely not
Perhaps, but not necessarily
Don't know yet
View Results

Related Stories


Local Headlines


Top Commented Stories (more)


Top Commented Stories (more)


Sports Headlines


 All Contents Copyright © 2009 News Tribune Co. All rights reserved.
 AP stories Copyright © 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Click for copyright details.
 Comments or questions? Contact us.
 Employees

 


rss Available Feeds
rss iconRSS Political News
rss iconRSS Press Releases
rss iconRSS Local News
rss iconRSS State News
rss iconRSS Business
rss iconRSS Sports
rss iconRSS Entertainment
About RSS Feeds

 


Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.
Copyright © 2009. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.