News Tribune
News Tribune
Central Missouri's information you need!
map
Sunday, July 05, 2009
Print this story | Email this story | Comment (No comments posted.) | Rate | - Text Size -

Battle against meth rages in Missouri

By Ra'Vae Edwards
redwards@newstribune.com
Published: Sunday, February 17, 2008 2:21 PM CST
MORGAN COUNTY, Mo. - Law enforcement officials say the high number of methamphetamine-related incidents reported for 2007 is an indication they actively are fighting the war on meth in Missouri.

Again ranking top in the nation with 1,285 meth-related incidents, reported by 95 of Missouri's 115 counties, some law enforcement officials wonder whether meth actually is a larger problem in Missouri, or if the numbers are higher because law enforcement is proactive in its efforts.

“I think as time goes on some other states will realize they have a problem just like Missouri,” said Morgan County Sheriff Jim Petty.

“It might be that they have the same problem and don't know what to look for, or it might be an issue with manpower. Either way - I guarantee you meth is out there.”

Petty is the director of the Mid-Missouri Multi-Jurisdictional Task Force based in Morgan County.

Pseudoephedrine is a key ingredient needed to manufacture meth.


Although the number of meth incidents has declined since state lawmakers limited the amount of pseudoephedrine that can be purchased in a 30-day time period, investigators say the problem has not gone “away” - it only has shifted.

Petty said the type of investigations required to catch users and distributors has changed greatly, because the drug is being brought into the area rather than manufactured here.

“It has changed the way we investigate. If they're not cooking (meth), there is obviously not a chance of an explosion or someone smelling the odors or seeing the trash from the residue,” Petty said. “Instead, now it is getting it shipped in and we have to rely on information from the public.

“I promise you, meth is still very much available.”

Petty said investigators currently have to travel from pharmacy to pharmacy to gather information indicating who has purchased cold medications containing pseudoephedrine.

“Once we get the logs gathered up each month, then we sit down, sift through them and compare to see who is purchasing their limit using multiple pharmacies - we go knock on their door,” Petty said. “It takes a lot of man hours to do that but it is the only system we have right now.”

State Rep. Kenny Jones, R-Clarksburg, with support from other lawmakers, is sponsoring House Bill 1619, which would require a statewide computer system to track the sale of pseudoephedrine, making it easier for law enforcement and investigators to track suspected drug abusers.

“Right now, we have some meth manufacturers who travel from pharmacy to pharmacy or town to town buying pseudoephedrine, and we do not have a way to track it other than on paper,” Jones said. “A statewide computer system will give law enforcement the tool they need to access that information in a timely manner, to know who these guys are without wasting large amounts of time sifting through paperwork.”

Jones said the system would be set up to raise a flag when a person is entered in the system multiple times, at which time law enforcement would be notified.

If the bill passes and Gov. Matt Blunt signs it into law, it would go into effect Aug. 28.



pencil ad
Previous   Next
Southeast Missouri to get new cancer, heart disease care   Judge refuses house arrest for school shooting suspect

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:


Before commenting read the News Tribune Forum's policies and procedures.
Thanks.

ndnlvngcherokee wrote on Feb 27, 2008 2:45 PM:

" And for all of those who say i dont know what I am talking about how many of you have teenagers or kids even younger...talk to the kids in college, high school, middle school, and yes even younger than that. What is sad is they seem to know more about this stuff then alot of people posting saying it doesnt hurt you. Anything that impairs your brain has alot of affect on the body. But I guess after so many doing MJ they just cant use their brain to see that. "

ndnlvngcherokee wrote on Feb 27, 2008 2:43 PM:

" Just to let alot of people know we dont need to worry just about MJ we need to worry about what is in our medicine cabinets that kids can get ahold of. The newest thing (not really new) is to take a mix different prescription drugs and take a handfull and pop them for a high. Not only is it dangerous but alot of these parties (yes they are parties) start with the teens smoking MJ. People wake up and see that this is affecting our youth and we need it to stop. It isnt even comparable to the 60-70s....theres alot more to worry about Mj maybe grown the same but when they are selling they are adding stuff to it and wrapping with extras... "

missjc wrote on Feb 22, 2008 3:57 PM:

" Byron W I was only kidding. I do not think drugs should be legal I think the cops need to crack down even more then they have been, I am personaly tired of my 16 year old niece being able to get pretty much ANY drug she wants off of the streets, it is so easy for these kids to get it is scary!! "

Byron W. wrote on Feb 21, 2008 12:33 PM:

" Missjc wrote "I say make ALL drugs legal!!! "

you might be right. aren't drug laws an invasion of privacy of the pusher and the user?

"

shinymcshine wrote on Feb 19, 2008 5:34 PM:

" once question. Would MJ related traffic crashes go up or down with legaization of the drug?
Unless you're completely in denial, you know they'd go up and they'd go up dramatically.
That alone tells me there's no reason to do it. "

jeffmoman wrote on Feb 19, 2008 5:32 PM:

" And yes I do have a double standard! "

jeffmoman wrote on Feb 19, 2008 5:31 PM:

" GO figure--->Missouri is one of the few states in the US where the number of alcohol related fatalities has actually increased since 1982. However, the percentage of alcohol related fatalities has gone down as the total number of highway fatalities has increased. The alcohol related death rate per 100 million VMT has also decreased. In 2005, out of all traffic fatalities, 35% involved a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 or higher. "

jeffmoman wrote on Feb 19, 2008 5:30 PM:

" One more thing about using irresponsible, is that there is a big difference in impairment between alcohol and marijuana. Alcohol most defiantly impairs your motor skills and reaction time far more than marijuana. I'm not saying that its right to smoke and drive, but I don't see MJ causing wrecks like alcohol does. "

jeffmoman wrote on Feb 19, 2008 5:26 PM:

" I just don't see it being anymore destructive than alcohol or tobacco, and those are legal. And yes if you did legalize it there would more that likely be an influx of use and increase in irresponsible use. But I will say this, it happened with alcohol too after prohibition. And society has adapted, gone are the days of the cop pulling you over and dumping out your beers and telling you to go home. Now you go to jail, have to go to classes and lose your license. This has worked drunk driving fatalities are down. The same would happen with pot, but I don't think to such an extent, because we already have alcohol laws in effect, that would be comparable. "

Missjc wrote on Feb 19, 2008 5:04 PM:

" I say make ALL drugs legal!!! "

Boscoe wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:51 PM:

" Oh yeah, I forgot that regular cigarettes give the user a "stoner high" that makes him/her lethargic, have very slow reaction times, and clouds their judgement in a buzz that lasts a day or more from one smoke. Yeah, you are right that cigarettes are no worse than pot. (NOT)

I agree with you on one thing: I don't smoke cigarettes either just like I don't smoke pot or drink. None of these are helpful for me to reach any of my goals, and none add anything positive to my life. They would just add negatives, pain, and destruction. "

shinymcshine wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:46 PM:

" I won't for a second try to compare the evils of meth to the evils of MJ. The thing is, "evils" applies to both. Alcohol could easily be thrown into the same catagory, given all the carnage it has cost over the years. My point is once legalized, you can reasonably expect usage to increase substantially. With increased use comes increased victims of the irresponsible use.
Adding one more chemical to make more people do more stupid things seems pretty wrong headed.
I don't think we have to call pot "ok" to continue to a war on meth.
"

observer wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:27 PM:

" Just a thought: We all know marijuana is bad, I won't lie and say it's "medicinal" or any of that rhetoric. But, it's no worse than cigarettes or alcohol, and they are perfectly legal vices, and a huge source of tax income for the government. What if, we make marijuana legal, and save the hundreds of millions, even billions of dollars wasted trying to fight it, and instead used that money to fight a truly evil drug like meth, and on top of the money saved, used all the money made by regulating marijuana sales, to fight meth also? Where would that leave us in our "war on drugs"? "

shinymcshine wrote on Feb 19, 2008 3:38 PM:

" pretty accurate since one of the ingredients is lithium batteries.
Its basically a stack of about a dozen poisons that if cooked right, won't kill you.....or at least, right away. "

KrazyK wrote on Feb 19, 2008 12:45 PM:

" Meth is a horrible and disgusting drug. It rots peoples minds and teeth. Any person who wants to put it into there body might as well shoot up some battery acid!!! "

truthseeker wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:11 AM:

" As I look at the package I see that its use is for temporarily relieving sinus congestion and pressure and nasal congestion due to cold, hay fever and other upper respiratory allergies. No where on this package does it list one of its uses to be for stupid people to cook it into something else. I guess what I am trying to say is if this law will help the problem with meth lets do it today. I do however find it regretable that innocent people who use it for the purpose it is made for have to be on lists which may include those who use it for illegal(not to mention stupid) purposes. "

truthseeker wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:58 AM:

" Jeffmoman, Yes there are many other meds that may work for some people instead of this one.
When the previous law was passed many brands containing this med were actually reformulated with another decongestant. The other decongestants do not work for me. I have severe sinus pressure and headaches that can only be relieved by psudoephedrine which I have to sign for. Does that bother me? yes a little since I am using it for the purpose it was intended for and not something stupid. Pass the new law also if it will help but I think people will still find a way to get it for the WRONG reasons. Are the other things they put into this mess also being restricted like this is? "

jasmine wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:54 AM:

" There is no such thing as a Former addict. We are "Recovering Addicts" We will always be addicts, but we can recover. I have been clean for 10 years. I Started with alcohol and yes.....POT! Yes you can become addicted to POT. If you are willing to risk loosing your job or your freedom just to smoke a little "maryjane", I think you have a problem. Look at the NFL player who lost a multi million dollar career because he couldn't stop smoking POT. The "weed" you are smoking is not a gift from GOD. Smoke some ditch weed (God's gift)and tell me its the same as the stuff you usually smoke. "

midmoguy4 wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:19 AM:

" I know a couple of former addicts, been clean for a few years so yes you can get clean and stay clean it has been a struggle for these people they even moved 50 miles from their source to get clean but for their kids they did it. "

omygoodness wrote on Feb 18, 2008 8:10 PM:

" yep jeff your tolerance for pot and not meth is rather mind boggling , you know many of your meth dealers do and sell pot as well "

shinymcshine wrote on Feb 18, 2008 4:15 PM:

" problem? Why is it a problem, jeff? After reading some of your other posts, i'm a little confused by your double standard of drugs. If someone wants to do meth, why is it our business? Why not legalize it and regulate it? That seems to be the answer with marijuana. Granted, meth ain't pot, but then again, pot has ill-effects too. Multiple carcinogens, phsycological addictions, and a host of other undesirable effects. Just cuz you like pot and not meth, should our friendly meth producers be descriminated against?
(and for burnouts that may not recognize it, THIS, my little crispy friends is sarcasm!) lol "

jeffmoman wrote on Feb 18, 2008 3:53 PM:

" This is where the majority of our drug fighting dollars should go towards. Is there a better OTC medicine than Pseudo ephedrine? I would hope we could find something that could replace that and just get rid of the problem for good. "

shinymcshine wrote on Feb 18, 2008 2:39 PM:

" I for one have never met a "former addict". They're just not currently using. The addiction with meth is TOO strong. The hard core users I've run across will never get off of it for good. They talk a good game, but they'll always return to it at some point.
Must be a helluvan addiction.... "

midmoguy4 wrote on Feb 18, 2008 12:55 PM:

" Meth is a very destructive drug just ask anyone who was an addict at one point in there lives. Or just ask their family. I'm all for laws that make it tougher on people who make, sell or use that junk. "

ndnlvngcherokee wrote on Feb 18, 2008 11:58 AM:

" castigliano you must be kidding...unless of course he is also your source?? You seem to be the first to support any kind of drug use...
Its really sad when people think the only thing possible is drugs...we do have alot of children out now adays...its sad that we have an obese nation...part of that might be because parents dont want their kids outside anymore to run into people like that that are doing and selling any form of drugs...we cant protect them all the time but we sure can try cant we? "

boscoe wrote on Feb 18, 2008 11:40 AM:

" I wonder how many of these meth-heads have also used pot? "

elrenno wrote on Feb 18, 2008 11:33 AM:

" Castigliano, I have one word for you...

"CLUELESS".

Do you think these people making meth are the only ones using? They are selling too. What happens when they sell to kids. One of these kids will get it into your kid's hands. Or worse, your kid will buy. Or maybe your best friend. A loved one. Anyone close to you. Will you still feel the same? Let them kill themselves?

What do we do? Nothing? Let people make all the drugs they want? Sell all the drugs they want? No laws?

Are you really that stupid? Or are you a user? "

boscoe wrote on Feb 18, 2008 8:53 AM:

" Too bad prison is so easy. Make it very hard time in a violent and scary place. Make prison an everlasting hell that no one would ever want to go there. "

shinymcshine wrote on Feb 18, 2008 8:51 AM:

" If he was cooking, he was selling. There's no integrity in who its sold too. Every meth addict USED to not be a meth addict. SOMEBODY introduced them to it and got them addicted. Anyone that creates something that devestates so many lives is a menace. Prison is where we segregate those types from the rest of us that just want to live our lives as safely as possible. "

shinymcshine wrote on Feb 18, 2008 8:47 AM:

" Amsterdam took that same approach and it was a miserable failure. I agree, you generally can't protect people from themselves but meth producers ARE dangerous. They DO hurt people. Ask any cop anywhere. Meth freaks, tweakin on the drug are some of the most volotile people you'll come in contact with. There's no "reasonable use" of meth. They don't sit at home and watch their lava lamps. They're loaded, driving around and stealing. They're too messed up to actually hold any sort of job for very long, so they'll gladly take YOUR money/property if its within their ability.
Don't kid yourself casti...Meth kills the user and endangers everyone else. "

castigliano wrote on Feb 18, 2008 8:37 AM:

" With all the money we spend on drug interdiction and how little good it does. There are more drugs around than ever. One of my neighbors got 30 years for making meth, he was a pretty good guy, he was not somebody who caused trouble by stealing or being mean to others. There he sits in prison day after day, I'm sure he'll be out in another 15-20 years, but what a waste of his life and my tax dollars. So we are going to get tougher and tougher, instead of 30 years, they'll get 50 years. You law makers don't have the brain God gave a pea. If grown adults want to kill themselves with poison let them. "


To add your comments you must be registered and logged in

*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
*Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

Return to: News State « | Home « | Top of Page ^


-

Sports Poll
Online Poll

Will the resignation of Sarah Palin as Alaska's governor negatively impact her viability as a potential Republican nominee for President in 2012? (Read story here)
Yes, definitely
No, definitely not
Perhaps, but not necessarily
Don't know yet
View Results

Related Stories


Local Headlines


Top Commented Stories (more)


Top Commented Stories (more)


Sports Headlines


 All Contents Copyright © 2009 News Tribune Co. All rights reserved.
 AP stories Copyright © 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Click for copyright details.
 Comments or questions? Contact us.
 Employees

 


rss Available Feeds
rss iconRSS Political News
rss iconRSS Press Releases
rss iconRSS Local News
rss iconRSS State News
rss iconRSS Business
rss iconRSS Sports
rss iconRSS Entertainment
About RSS Feeds

 


Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.
Copyright © 2009. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.