News Tribune
News Tribune
Central Missouri's information you need!
map
Sunday, July 05, 2009
Print this story | Email this story | Comment (No comments posted.) | Rate | - Text Size -

Former deputy clerk sentenced in stealing case

By Jeff Halidman
News Tribune
Published: Monday, February 4, 2008 7:32 PM CST
“These are the kind of cases that keep a judge up at night,” Special Judge Robert Schollmeyer said Monday as he sentenced a former deputy Cole County circuit clerk who last year was found guilty of stealing funds from the circuit clerk's office.

Schollmeyer, of Osage County, sentenced Jamie Wolfe to 120-days shock time in prison, with the likelihood that - if she completes that successfully - she'll be put on five years' supervised probation.

She also must pay restitution.

Last December, a Cole County jury took a little more than a half-hour to find Wolfe, 27, guilty of the stealing charge, a class C felony.

“I don't think I deserve jail time, and I haven't done anything wrong,” she said before she was sentenced.

Prosecutor Mark Richardson recommended that Wolfe get three years in prison, while the sentencing advisory report prepared by the Probation and Parole office recommended five years of supervised probation.


Richardson said he asked for prison time because of Wolfe's unwillingness to take responsibility for her actions, and Schollmeyer said that was the reason why he thought prison time was proper.

“Your case is different than the run-of-the mill stealing cases, because it deals with public funds,” Schollmeyer told Wolfe, “and if the public gives money to be put in a certain place, that's where they expect it to go.”

In a trial last June, a jury could not reach a verdict in Wolfe's case.

The Cole County Grand Jury indicted her in January 2007.

In March 2006, then-Presiding Judge Tom Brown said an internal review of financial records found that, between December 2005 and late-January 2006, approximately $2,200 was received by the clerks in the criminal division, but was not credited to any account or included with daily deposits.

The discrepancy was discovered when a litigant claimed he had not received proper credit for a payment he had made.

The Cole County circuit court marshal's staff investigated and turned the findings over to the sheriff's department, which then turned the case over to then-Prosecutor Bill Tackett.

He filed charges against Wolfe in October 2006.

In the December trial, the jury heard more than six hours of testimony, which was similar to the testimony and evidence presented during June trial.

A number of former and current circuit court employees testified.

All of them said they never saw Wolfe take any money.

But Richardson tried to show, with their testimony, that only Wolfe's computer was found to have had discrepancies, because each clerk is given a password they are not allowed to give to anyone else.

Richardson's chief witness was Circuit Court Marshal Steve Diemler, who conducted the investigation and showed the jury a large number of documents he went through to trace the missing money back to Wolfe's computer.

Diemler, who helped install the system the clerk's office uses, said it was physically impossible for one person to make an entry at a particular time at one computer and have that same person be shown to make an entry on another computer at the same exact time.

He said that was what he found on Wolfe's computer.

Defense attorney Heather Vodnansky of the Public Defender's office told jurors that all this showed was that it was Wolfe's work station that was being used - it didn't show it actually was Wolfe who was using the computer.

That's because at the time the money was found to be missing, the clerk's office in the criminal division was severely understaffed and on busy days and anyone could have had access to Wolfe's computer because people logged onto computers and left them on.

As in June, Wolfe testified in her own defense, saying she turned herself in when she found out she was being charged.

She felt someone had set her up.



pencil ad
Previous   Next
Woman faces murder charge in child's death   Home on 179 gutted by fire

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:


Before commenting read the News Tribune Forum's policies and procedures.
Thanks.

mom123 wrote on Feb 11, 2008 3:57 PM:

" Just because she took pymt and recorded the receipt into the docket doesn't mean she is the one who stole the money. Who prepared the deposits? Who reconciled the deposits back the the composition of receipts? At the time the receipts were reconciled to the deposit the theft should have been found then, IF, she was the one who took the money. The deposit would have never balanced to the receipts reported received by the computer. However, if the persons preparing the deposit pulled a "cash/check substitution scheme" this could mean she was really set-up. I prayer for this girl's sake REAL AUDITORS look at this case and not some county employee computer guy who has something to lose. "

melloc wrote on Feb 8, 2008 10:07 AM:

" From what I got from the hearing, the stealing was tracked through the system because she would log into her computer, put the "costs and fines paid in full" docket entry into the system, but keep the money. That is how the computer system tracked it back to her user name and password, because the people who had receipts showing that it was paid in full, but was still turned over to debt collection because the system didn't have the money attached to the case where all people who had the "costs and fines paid in full" docket entry on their case with her user name and password.. "

go_fish wrote on Feb 7, 2008 4:39 PM:

" I agree with you mikemojc that the state auditor who routinely audits county governments should follow up. mom123, you raise a really good point, if there was no recording of the payments, how did the stealing occur and what would the absence of computer records show? My only guess would be video recordings of people's transactions occuring, if there are camera's and video's are archived. "

mikemojc wrote on Feb 7, 2008 1:54 PM:

" mom123, go_fish, I agree with you guys that there's not quite enough information in this article to actually reach any conclusions. I just hope the Mo State Auditor's office and OSCA get a chance to get together, go over the records, and issue a public report about just what seems to have happened, and when it happened. The funds in question are under the control of a government office (the courts) so I dont see a reason the report couldn't be public... "

mom123 wrote on Feb 7, 2008 1:26 PM:

" Question-If the money was never credited to the persons account, then what kind of proof of stealing will the computer records show, since the money was never recorded? Wished I was at the hearing, because I just don't understand how this girl could be found guilty beyond a reasonble doubt. "

go_fish wrote on Feb 7, 2008 12:58 PM:

" Well said mikemojc. "

mikemojc wrote on Feb 7, 2008 12:43 PM:

" 2 problems here, accounting procedures and computer security. Basic accounting procedures should have made whatever money annomilies that happened a one day occurance. That it happened on multiple days is not any single clerks fault, but a procedural problem on the whole court's part. The computer security thing is simple. If clerks leave their machine, they are supposed to log off or lock it. If another clerk needs to use the machine, that 2nd clerk should restart the machine and log into the network and the accounting program as themselves. Wether this clerk actually stole or not, this court was not using standard, acceptable accounting and security procedures, and that's Mr. Diemlers job to see that they do. "

jj wrote on Feb 7, 2008 12:35 PM:

" I do not disagree with the punishment BUT, this lady was a 1st time offender and got prison time. There are dope dealers, burglars, and car thieves that get probation after probation time and time again. That really ticks me off to see people get to run free every day that are hard criminals, and a 1st timer with no history get prison. Just dont make much sense to me. But hey, and then again the U.S. did lock up one of the most violent wemen in the world. MARTHA STEWART! She was the only woman left who would cook and clean and we locked her up. (ha ha) But really I see repeat offenders that dont ever see prison time for dope deals andotherstuffworsethanthecrimeshacommitted!!!! "

go_fish wrote on Feb 7, 2008 11:23 AM:

" melloc, you appear to be reading into my post something that was not said. I do not condone the theft, only the sentencing that was based upon her occupation rather than the crime. It appears from what the judge said that if she had done the same thing at walmart, her sentence would have been different. Beyond that, the county needs to institute basic accounting principles to prevent a reoccurance. "

winky615 wrote on Feb 7, 2008 8:32 AM:

" It's a good thing we don't try people based on newspaper articles then. "

Byron W. wrote on Feb 6, 2008 10:54 AM:

" based on the article only, there was not proof beyond a resonable doubt. "

melloc wrote on Feb 5, 2008 4:50 PM:

" go_fish I don't agree with your comments. This clerk was hired and trusted along with everyone else in that office. Were you at the hearing? Not everything that was said in that hearing was put in the paper. To summarize what you said... does it make it right for someone to break into your house and steal your stuff, just because you don't keep your doors locked at all times? or if a co-worker has her purse in her drawer, but not locked.. does it make it right to steal her purse because she didn't "lock" it up. There are laws in place no matter who you are, its a crime. "

go_fish wrote on Feb 5, 2008 4:39 PM:

" Another victim of poor accounting practices and a complete lack of checks and balences. The county that is. Even a convenience store matches their cash register to their receipts at the end of every shift. The clerks office lacked the basic accounting practices that most entities involved in handling money institute. I'm not trying to blame the victim for the crime, but I've also worked around unlocked work stations and stuff does happen while the cat's away. And to be sentenced based upon your belief in yourself...that amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. Even if she did steal, the system's handling appears to be unjust as well. There should be no difference in sentencing for public vs privatemoney "


To add your comments you must be registered and logged in

*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
*Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

Return to: News Local « | Home « | Top of Page ^


-

Sports Poll
Online Poll

Will the resignation of Sarah Palin as Alaska's governor negatively impact her viability as a potential Republican nominee for President in 2012? (Read story here)
Yes, definitely
No, definitely not
Perhaps, but not necessarily
Don't know yet
View Results

Related Stories


Local Headlines


Top Commented Stories (more)


Top Commented Stories (more)


Sports Headlines


 All Contents Copyright © 2009 News Tribune Co. All rights reserved.
 AP stories Copyright © 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Click for copyright details.
 Comments or questions? Contact us.
 Employees

 


rss Available Feeds
rss iconRSS Political News
rss iconRSS Press Releases
rss iconRSS Local News
rss iconRSS State News
rss iconRSS Business
rss iconRSS Sports
rss iconRSS Entertainment
About RSS Feeds

 


Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.
Copyright © 2009. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.